The fact is, this is a theory.
Not a proven fact. that d
If 97% of scientists believe it, it's still a theory not a fact.
100% of clergy believe in a god.
So all clergy agreed that a god exists, so god is a fact?According to these scientists it is fact not theory. Evolution was a theory, but scientists agreed that it was real and made it fact. And to this day, there are still evolution deniers. And of coarse climate change deniers as well. Eventually you'll have to accept it. It is greed that drives denial, all the deniers care about is COLD. HARD. CASH.
Which fact proves its man made?based on facts
There not scientists...So all clergy agreed that a god exists, so god is a fact?
I don't give a shit about cash.
I have more than I will ever need.
97% of scientists agree it's manmade and the greenhouse effect agrees with themWhich fact proves its man made?
Ok so a belief by a scientist is a fact.There not scientists...
We know that, but what are the facts to support this belief?97% of scientists agree it's manmade and the greenhouse effect agrees with them
The greenhouse effectWe know that, but what are the facts to support this belief?
You just claimed that NASA, the NOAA, and 97% of climate scientists can't understand science. WOW, deniers will go so far!Its like they cant understand science.
we all know its just mental blockage from decades of being a right wing propaganda lapper
Unproven theory.The greenhouse effect
CO2 traps heat. That's a proven, undeniable fact that deniers like to ignore. Now of coarse I'm not a scientist, but you may email one for the rock solid facts if you want.Unproven theory.
Show me facts, rock solid facts.
Co2 traps heat, I know.CO2 traps heat. That's a proven, undeniable fact that deniers like to ignore. Now of coarse I'm not a scientist, but you may email one for the rock solid facts if you want.
Considering we are currently emitting more CO2 than anything, and levels are rapidly rising, yes that is proof.Co2 traps heat, I know.
Still isn't rock solid proof of man caused global warming, strong evidence, yes but not proof.