The media is hilarious...

I don't think that matters as much as you think it will. Here's why: Only hard-core political junkies watch debates. The masses get their impressions later, from the mass media.

The leftist-infested media will manipulate public perception with strategically-edited sound quotes, bites and video clips to make Gropin' Joe look like the winner and the president look like the loser. By the time Facebook and the Twitter-verse kick in (fueled by Bloomberg's multi-millions), the "take" is going to be altered out of all recognition. That's the power of propaganda.

Biden could shit his pants and spontaneously combust on the debate stage, and nobody will know unless they watch the whole thing in real time.

DEMOCRATS don't care how bad their candidate is. They proved that in 2016.

I agree with this to an extent, but consider the fact that the media really wanted Hillary to win. Despite all the negative press, enough people in enough states voted for Trump.

A lot of the propaganda tactics of the media tend to work best in urban areas. This is why they want to get rid of the Electoral College. Because Trump was able to appeal to a wider range of voters, he won.

I think Biden will have the same issue even with the media taking his side. He's popular among urban voters, but he's not going to win most rural voters. The electoral battleground is among the suburban voters, and I think Trump still has the edge there.
 
I agree with this to an extent, but consider the fact that the media really wanted Hillary to win. Despite all the negative press, enough people in enough states voted for Trump.

A lot of the propaganda tactics of the media tend to work best in urban areas. This is why they want to get rid of the Electoral College. Because Trump was able to appeal to a wider range of voters, he won.

I think Biden will have the same issue even with the media taking his side. He's popular among urban voters, but he's not going to win most rural voters. The electoral battleground is among the suburban voters, and I think Trump still has the edge there.

Good points. We shall see. I think you should be a little more worried about Pedo Joe. Not because of any debate he might lose, but because he has the party machine, the bulk of the media, and the support of the Silicon Valley internet overlords.
 
Good points. We shall see. I think you should be a little more worried about Pedo Joe. Not because of any debate he might lose, but because he has the party machine, the bulk of the media, and the support of the Silicon Valley internet overlords.

Thanks. I will admit that I am wary of the effects of social media in general. The biases of Silicon Valley are pretty blatant indeed.
 
You think a Democrat is going to win a Confederate state?

They already have. But that’s not what the discussion is about. It’s about the primary. If you want to eliminate Democrats from red states from voting in the democratic primary be my guest.
 
How so? I've shown you evidence of Joe Biden's behavior.

His actions aren't disturbing?


VastLateCondor-size_restricted.gif


No, although the RW is doing its best to paint them as disturbing. I'll be disturbed when one of you mandated reporters turn him in to CPS and they say he committed crimes. :awesome:
 
They criticize Joe for being too "handsy" yet have no problem with a president wanting to date his own daughter.

Yep, and how about this creepiness?

"Donald Trump joked that he and his daughter Ivanka have sex in common in a February 2013 taped appearance on The Wendy Williams Show.

During a question and answer game, Williams asked Ivanka, "What's the favorite thing you have in common with your father?"

Ivanka answered, "Either real estate or golf" while Trump added, "Well, I was going to say sex, but I can't relate that to her."

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/donald-trump-once-joked-he-ivanka-have-sex-common-941600
 
How do the exit pollsters decide which exiting "voters" to ask? Are you saying the exit pollsters ask everyone leaving a polling location how they voted? How do exit pollsters they know that the people they ask actually voted, if they didn't see them mark a ballot? How do exit pollsters know that the people they ask voted for the candidate they claimed they did? How do you know that exit pollsters are reporting their results accurately?

How do you know the demographics of a precinct are accurate?

How do you know the people who supposedly voted in a precinct match the demographics?

Typically every 8th voter (depending on the sample desired) are asked how they voted and some additional questions. You ask them if they voted. You assume they are telling the truth. You don't know for sure, of course, but when the exit polls are very close to the actual results it proves the method was reliable. Sometimes one group may be over-sampled, but when it doesn't tend to throw off the entire exist poll. Census Bureau data shows the demographics of the precinct.

I could have turned out the lights and thrown darts at a poster with the candidates faces on them and achieved the same "accuracy," couldn't I?

It is unlikely you could have gotten 11/14 states correct using any method (without using polls).
 
Back
Top