The media is hilarious...

Legion said:
The writers of some of the articles used words like "misleading", "deceptive", and "misinformation", and you stopped reading because your confirmation bias was sated, right?

:D
Click to expand...

Wrong. I see the trump organization liars and the social media promoting those lies getting called to account for their actions. Nancy is the principled one here, if she had anything to do with it. :nodyes:
 
christiefan915 said:
I see the trump organization liars and the social media promoting those lies getting called to account for their actions.
Click to expand...

Of course you do. :D

I see the Speaker of the House putting pressure on a company to change their rules for the benefit of her party. :D
 
Legion said:
Of course you do. :D

I see the Speaker of the House putting pressure on a company to change their rules for the benefit of her party. :D
Click to expand...

Misleading and deceptive ads did not violate a policy to limit misleading and deceptive ads?
 
Flash said:
I always hear the media critics claim "I bet the MSM won't print this" after I have already read it in several sources. They claim they don't read the MSM because it is biased, so I don't know why the think it did not print those stories if they don't read it. The most common answer is "I heard it on Rush Limbaugh."
Click to expand...

It's not so much that the media won't cover a story but that they leave out certain relevant facts.

It's also clear that they favor certain narratives. Look at the disparity in how they cover different mass shootings. If it involves a shooter that is right wing or can be portrayed as such, the media will run with it. If the shooter is left wing or liberal (or a minority), then they will typically give it less coverage.
 
Woko Haram said:
It's not so much that the media won't cover a story but that they leave out certain relevant facts.

It's also clear that they favor certain narratives. Look at the disparity in how they cover different mass shootings. If it involves a shooter that is right wing or can be portrayed as such, the media will run with it. If the shooter is left wing or liberal (or a minority), then they will typically give it less coverage.
Click to expand...

I believe that I have noticed the same tendencies.
 
Jack said:
Well, we'll get to see how the rest of the country votes as this thing plays out.
Click to expand...
In '16, the country was ready for change. Clinton could have been the first female POTUS. Instead, through a glitch in the system, we ended up with an illiterate fool who promised to destroy the govt.

This election is about stability. Sanders doesn't offer that. Nor does trump.
 
TTQ64 said:
I'm talking about he media spreading lies and mis information. They are doing every thing possible to get biden the nom. They then will say Blacks wanted biden instead of bernie.........as if the blacks want the status quo instead of opportunity for all.

when in reality....... it's whites, the majority, who are afraid of "socialism" and want to stay exactly where we are. Staying where we are benefits THEM.
Click to expand...

So are you saying that if Biden gets the nomination and loses to Trump that blacks are being set up to take the fall?
 
Althea said:
In '16, the country was ready for change. Clinton could have been the first female POTUS. Instead, through a glitch in the system, we ended up with an illiterate fool who promised to destroy the govt.

This election is about stability. Sanders doesn't offer that. Nor does trump.
Click to expand...

Well, this Election is 'Get rid of that Clown Trump' in my opinion.
So, you have the 'middle lane' (Biden) and ...
you have the 'progressive lane' (Bernie).

Blue Team will pick their Nominee, and we'll all get on board and elect THAT person.
 
Jack said:
Well, this Election is 'Get rid of that Clown Trump' in my opinion.
So, you have the 'middle lane' (Biden) and ...
you have the 'progressive lane' (Bernie).

Blue Team will pick their Nominee, and we'll all get on board and elect THAT person.
Click to expand...
Yes...dump trump is the plan. But, I believe that everyone except for the children realize that 'revolution' simply feeds into trump's narrative against Bernie.

As a whole, the country is ready for stability. Sanders doesn't offer that. He's stuck in '16.
 
Althea said:
In '16, the country was ready for change. Clinton could have been the first female POTUS. Instead, through a glitch in the system, we ended up with an illiterate fool who promised to destroy the govt.
Click to expand...

The "glitch in the system" has been part of the Constitution for centuries. It was established in Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution, ratified on June 21, 1788.

DEMOCRATS didn't complain when pollsters told them the Hildebeast was going to to sweep the electoral vote, nor did they call it a "glitch in the system".

The same pollsters you trust today predicted this on the eve of the 2016 election:

Screen-Shot-2016-11-09-at-2.19.36-PM-1024x146.png


Those are electoral vote predictions, in case you're too stupid to figure it out.

You didn't cry about the Electoral College until the Hildebeast lost, did you?

In fact, some people were so confident that they printed these:


s-l640.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top