THE NEW AND IMPROVED JPP THREAD BAN APPROVAL POLL

Should the Thread Ban feature be removed or kept?

  • Removed - It's nothing but a problem

    Votes: 3 18.8%

  • Keep it; becasue it's affectie and usful

    Votes: 11 68.8%

  • Keep it; because it just gives me something else to bitch and moan about.

    Votes: 2 12.5%
  • Total voters
    16
  • Poll closed .
Controlled Opposition said:
I remember that Winston Smith along with some fool who called himself, "Reasonable Guy" was foaming at the mouth, wanting to launch a preemptive nuclear strike on North Korea, knowing that it would cause the deaths of tens of millions of South Koreans. I wonder if they are smart enough to be embarrassed yet.
Click to expand...

I recall that as well. I doubt if "Winston Smith" aka JPP Jack really believed that; it's his way to say outrageous bullshit in order to get attention and get ppl riled up.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
I think you mean hiding BEHIND the dream.

Just like the other chickenshits with ban lists numbering in the dozens.
Click to expand...

What number of thread bans are acceptable to you?

Your post seems to imply that your problem is with LARGE thread ban lists and not with the practice itself. Please clarify
 
Legion said:
I've asked that question several times.

Think Zappacrite will ever cite his threshold number?

BTW, he says he doesn't use threadbans himself.
Click to expand...

No he will never give a number.

He will throw out his lame "See how I live rent free in Legion's head"? Zappacrite is the master of trying to have it both ways. If you don't talk to him, he claims you are afraid of him. If you talk to him then he is living rent free in your head. He is probably the most vacuous, predictable and uninspiring person to ever post on JPP


As I said, he no longer uses thread bans not because he has an issue with it, but as dumb as he is, he realizes that he can't criticize if he no longer uses it. In his mind he NEVER used it
 
If you don't like someone else's posts, what's wrong with 'Ignore? My own feeling is that dog-fights between perpetually-opposed individuals are not something to inflict on others, but I can't see why we have to have closed threads where the converted preach to the converted. What is the point?
 
Last edited:
iolo said:
If you don't like someone else's posts, what's wrong with 'Ignore? My own feeling is that dog-fights between perpetually-opposed individuals are not something to inflict on others, but I can't see why we have to have closed threads where the converted preach to the converted. What is the point?
Click to expand...

The point, Taff, is that the established membership of a privately-owned forum voted on the issue twice. Once to adopt, and later to retain thread-banning.

If you don't care for it, fuck off back to http://www.politicsforum.co.uk/forum/viewforum.php?f=104
 
I must admit I am honored!

Here I have gotten JPP's two biggest trolls to spend an entire page discussing little ol MOI!!

They whine and they bitch and they moan that I won't answer their question, yet each of them has dodged numerous questions put to them.

Yes, once again we find that they expect others to respond even though they have demonstrated that they won't when positions are reversed.

Maybe if they start treating other posters with respect, then they might start getting answers to their questions.

Ahhhh, who am I kidding...they're just two self absorbed douchenozzles who love to disrupt civil discussions.
 
I Love America said:
Like I said, he is nothing if not predictable
Click to expand...

You called it. 100%

ZappasGuitar said:
I must admit I am honored! Here I have gotten JPP's two biggest trolls to spend an entire page discussing little ol MOI!! They whine and they bitch and they moan that I won't answer their question, yet each of them has dodged numerous questions put to them. Yes, once again we find that they expect others to respond even though they have demonstrated that they won't when positions are reversed. Maybe if they start treating other posters with respect, then they might start getting answers to their questions. Ahhhh, who am I kidding...they're just two self absorbed douchenozzles who love to disrupt civil discussions.
Click to expand...
 
ZappasGuitar said:
I must admit I am honored!

Here I have gotten JPP's two biggest trolls to spend an entire page discussing little ol MOI!!

They whine and they bitch and they moan that I won't answer their question, yet each of them has dodged numerous questions put to them.

Yes, once again we find that they expect others to respond even though they have demonstrated that they won't when positions are reversed.

Maybe if they start treating other posters with respect, then they might start getting answers to their questions.

Ahhhh, who am I kidding...they're just two self absorbed douchenozzles who love to disrupt civil discussions.
Click to expand...

Are insults the sign of a weak mind?
 
ZappasGuitar said:
I must admit I am honored!

Here I have gotten JPP's two biggest trolls to spend an entire page discussing little ol MOI!!

They whine and they bitch and they moan that I won't answer their question, yet each of them has dodged numerous questions put to them.

Yes, once again we find that they expect others to respond even though they have demonstrated that they won't when positions are reversed.

Maybe if they start treating other posters with respect, then they might start getting answers to their questions.

Ahhhh, who am I kidding...they're just two self absorbed douchenozzles who love to disrupt civil discussions.
Click to expand...


maxresdefault.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top