It means he was one or the other...depending on which expert you rely on.
But as I said...it seems to me he was a guy who thought for himself...which would make him something disgusting to today's American conservatives.
If you have a point to make, Ooda, why not try to make it, rather than doing this running around the track crap you are trying.
Or...if you realize you cannot do that...just tell us all what in hell he has to do with what is being discussed here.
Actually, Madison is a hero to modern day conservatives, since he is considered to be the father of the Constitution.
Madison was considered a radical, a liberal, during the Revolution and up to the ratification of the Constitution. Because he sought change. After the changes that he wanted were made, he strove to maintain them in the spirit that they were intended. In other words, he was a conservative.
Which brings me to my point. The terms "liberal" and "conservative" are meaningless without historical perspective. You have ignored this perspective in your discussion.