THE "YOU DON'T LOVE THE CONSTITUTION" CRAP IN THIS FORUM!

Hilarious that you still think that SCOTUS is infallible, which was the crux of our argument that you continue to claim false victory. Perhaps you can "squawk" more; ignoring reality.

To correct you on your newest claim, Madison was a Federalist, but before he founded an opposition party:

http://www.history.com/topics/us-presidents/james-madison

* This content has been abbreviated. Jefferson and Madison formed the Republican Party in 1792. Six years later renamed it to the Democratic-Republican Party:

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Democratic-Republican-Party

lol

Still making excuses for your ass kicking. I had forgotten that you kept squawking “Dred Scott!” in addition to “Squawk! Tyrants in black robes!”

No, idiot, I never claimed they were infallible. That was YOUR take and merely demonstrates your lack of comprehension skills.

Madison opposed the ultra-Federalists like Hamilton. Doesn’t change the fact he had to placate the anti-Federalists with the BofR, just to get into office, does it?
 
Which would be impossible, Francis; because if you don't believe what you say you "know", then you can't know it.

My name is not Francis.

Of course I can know things without doing any "believing."

Sorry you cannot understand that.

Sorry I am getting under your skin as much as I am.
 
My name is not Francis.

Of course I can know things without doing any "believing."

Sorry you cannot understand that.

Sorry I am getting under your skin as much as I am.

Once again you exhibit the flaw in what passes for logic in your world, Francis.

To "know" that you were getting under my skin; you would first have to "believe" that you were getting under my skin. :D
 
Once again you exhibit the flaw in what passes for logic in your world, Francis.

To "know" that you were getting under my skin; you would first have to "believe" that you were getting under my skin. :D

No flaw.

I know I am getting under your skin...and it is not necessary for me to do any "believing" in order to do so.

;)

Stay calm. You'll be okay...I think.

And my name is not Francis.
 
But you must believe you're upsetting me, Francis; because you have no way to truly know. :D

I can see that you are upset...and that I upset you regularly.

You have very limited personal control.

My name is not Francis.

And...I do not do "believing."
 
No flaw.

I know I am getting under your skin...and it is not necessary for me to do any "believing" in order to do so.

;)

Stay calm. You'll be okay...I think.

And my name is not Francis.

That's it Francis; continue to believe that you know it to be fact, since it just shows that you do do "believing".
 
I can see that you are upset...and that I upset you regularly.

You have very limited personal control.

My name is not Francis.

And...I do not do "believing."

Then you should "know" that you really need to get your eyes checked, Francis.

And once again you post what you believe, when you have no way of knowing; but you should know that your comment says more about you, then it does me. :D
 
That's it Francis; continue to believe that you know it to be fact, since it just shows that you do do "believing".

My name is not Francis.

I do not do "believing."

You seem unusually distraught today, USF.

Perhaps you ought tend to your needs.
 
Then you should "know" that you really need to get your eyes checked, Francis.

And once again you post what you believe, when you have no way of knowing; but you should know that your comment says more about you, then it does me. :D

My name is not Francis.

You seem obsessed with me.

I do not do "believing."

Why does that bother you so?
 
Back
Top