NiftyNiblick
1960s Chick Magnet
Agreed.
Time To Dump The Second Amendment?
- Thread starter PoliTalker
- Start date
Agreed.
NiftyNiblick
1960s Chick Magnet
Ya like that, huh, Buck?
We got some of probably every kinda gun you can think of 'round heanh.
Oops, not no frufru Weatherbys, though.
No, some of you probably can't afford Weatherbys, but that's not the big problem.
The big problem is that you don't have functioning brains.
NiftyNiblick
1960s Chick Magnet
I seem to be in correspondence with them on the internet.
Truck Fump / h1b
Verified User
Talking boobs, now that's sexy.
ZenMode
Well-known member
It's not idiotic at all. It makes the point that the hype surrounding gun deaths is unwarranted and is based on political games/pandering, not actual data.
3.1 million children die of starvation/malnutrition every year around the world. You want something to be fired up about, that's it. But, there's no way for politicians to use that as a pawn, so nobody cares.
BidenPresident
Verified User
Makes no sense. You right wingers cannot be rational.
Truck Fump / h1b
Verified User
They like it when millions die. they believe the world is overpopulated and millions need to die.
Truck Fump / h1b
Verified User
are you a fucking idiot?
Matt Dillon
Semolina comes from wheat
Can you afford a BAR? How about a Tommy gun? Hmm? No?
STFU then.
Here's a listing for you, faggot; And you better have a class 3 license, too.
https://www.gunbroker.com/item/928623228
Here's another:
https://www.gunbroker.com/item/926787470
And here's a BAR, fuckstick:
https://www.gunbroker.com/item/934496295
You think crackers can't afford guns? Your Weatherbys do not interest them.
They know of better guns for cheaper in that area. You're just a retard.
I could afford a Weatherby, but I'd get a BAR or Savage or Remington before I did.
The latter may not look as nice, but shoot better, and the former is better all the way around.
Browning Mark III with the blued (blacked?) and gold.
Last edited:
Matt Dillon
Semolina comes from wheat
ZenMode
Well-known member
How about this fact....
Mass shootings (meaning 4+ people are shot in a single event), if we COMPLETELY eradicated them, would decrease gun homicides by about 2%, on average, per year?
Now do you see how irrelevant they are, other than fodder for brainless media outlets trolling for ratings?
Truck Fump / h1b
Verified User
Well that's a rhetorical question.
of course a dumb totalitarian marxist would think perspective is irrelevant....
stupid me, im a maggot infested fuck mattress.
BidenPresident
Verified User
You gun obsessives are like alcoholics. Whatever the damage done, it is always "more."
Matt Dillon
Semolina comes from wheat
You can't talk sense to a partisan fuckwit.
Matt Dillon
Semolina comes from wheat
Eat a bag of dicks, stupid kunt. Your opinion is irrelevant based on your stupid, k?
ZenMode
Well-known member
Understanding facts and reality and not giving in to irrational fear, is not being obsessed.
American Man
Verified User
The Founding Fathers believed that humans have inherent rights and that government exists to protect them. But, practically speaking, we only have whatever the government allows us. Does the 4th Amendment even exist anymore? The NSA has been monitoring all electronic comms since the 1970s without warrant.
BidenPresident
Verified User
You wrote no facts. Just posted irrelevant information.
ZenMode
Well-known member
Really? Mass shootings making up about 2% of gun homicides isn't a fact? What about the fact that a school kid has about a 1 in 7.5 million chance of being involved in a school shooting?
News outlets should dwell on airplane crashes, too.
BidenPresident
Verified User
What about the price of tea in China?????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!