Trump Engaged In ‘Outright Fraud’ To Help Family Save Hundreds Of Millions In Taxes

PostmodernProphet said:
lol.....you are so fucking confused........who gave them copies of Fred Trump's tax returns?........who gave them copies of his trust fund's invoices?......
Click to expand...

you were already told. It was started with his sister's financial disclosures as a judge. The reporters looked up the company she reported and it built from there. They discovered Fred was cheating the government and funneling the stolen money to his kids. then they tracked down the people and companies involved in his fraud.
None of this would be necessry if Trump provuided hiis taxes like every other person running has done for 50 years. Now we know why he didn't. He was cheating and still is.
 
Nordberg said:
keep parroting Fox Gnus propaganda. It is the totality of your reading and news. Trumps people prevented the FBI from doing the job. They have the ability to interview 400 in a week. If they had nothing to fear, why didn't the Repubs open it up. There were 80 people with information they wanted to share with the FBI. Trump was all for it, but McGahn got involved.He shut it down to get the result he wanted, not the facts.
Click to expand...

perhaps they didn't think your email revealed anything of relevance.....
 
Nordberg said:
you were already told. It was started with his sister's financial disclosures as a judge. The reporters looked up the company she reported and it built from there. They discovered Fred was cheating the government and funneling the stolen money to his kids. then they tracked down the people and companies involved in his fraud.
None of this would be necessry if Trump provuided hiis taxes like every other person running has done for 50 years. Now we know why he didn't. He was cheating and still is.
Click to expand...
not seeing the part about how they got access to Fred's taxes.....all they got from the sister's disclosure was that she received a distribution from the family trust when her parents died.....I've seen no evidence of cheating yet......this is another thing like Kavanaugh where you decide things without evidence and then whine when you realize you were wrong......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
not seeing the part about how they got access to Fred's taxes.....all they got from the sister's disclosure was that she received a distribution from the family trust when her parents died.....I've seen no evidence of cheating yet......this is another thing like Kavanaugh where you decide things without evidence and then whine when you realize you were wrong......
Click to expand...

you will never see the evidence. You vulpine glasses change the world into a right-wing Utopia. Kavanaugh was a horrible choice. trump had lots of better options. they fought for him because they did not want to show vulnerability. he rightys know they made a terrible choice for the court, but Bretty is a good right wing soldier who follows orders. We already know what he will vote for .He is not a judicial appointment but a political one.the bar assoc was discussing removing their approval due to his terrible judicial temperament. Bret showed his conspiracy bonafides too.
 
Nordberg said:
the repubs excluded about 80 people who wanted to speak about Bret to the FBI. they engineered the decision and the investigation.
Click to expand...

and you think they didn't screen the calls to see how many of you were crackpots......just because they didn't answer your email doesn't mean they didn't read it.......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
and you think they didn't screen the calls to see how many of you were crackpots......just because they didn't answer your email doesn't mean they didn't read it.......
Click to expand...

Why do you make up shit like that? I read testimonials by Yale students who wanted to speak to FBI. You read fox Gnus. You are a representative of why the right is so problematic. You ridicule people you know nothing about. You took another step down the ladder to the bottom.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
I think we agree on that......
Click to expand...

Try something tricky, thinking about it. He attacked her and denied it. She said he did it and she knew him very well. What real evidence is possible? You think his co-rapist will tell on himself and brett? that would require a confession from an accomplice. Asking a lot. Might expose them both to legal problems. the other people were at a party 30 years ago. Why would they have a special memory of it. It was just another party 30 years ago.
But what evidence is possible? fact is many people were willing to say Brett was a mean ,blackout drinker. He denied that. Just another of his many lies and lack of qualifications.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
I think we agree on that......
Click to expand...

Try something tricky, thinking about it. He attacked her and denied it. She said he did it and she knew him very well. What real evidence is possible? You think his co-rapist will tell on himself and brett? that would require a confession from an accomplice. Asking a lot. Might expose them both to legal problems. the other people were at a party 30 years ago. Why would they have a special memory of it. It was just another party 30 years ago.
But what evidence is possible? fact is many people were willing to say Brett was a mean ,blackout drinker. He denied that. Just another of his many lies and lack of qualifications.
Perhaps a lie detector was required.
 
Nordberg said:
Why do you make up shit like that? .
Click to expand...

dude......you're the one making shit up........and what would Yale students know about Kavanaugh's high school.......the FBI was charged with finding corroboration of Ford's testimony.........if you wanted to talk about Yale you should have brought it up during the hearings.........

You took another step down the ladder to the bottom.
Click to expand...

I'm sorry......did I step on your fingers?.....
 
PostmodernProphet said:
so we all agree there was no possible evidence.......
Click to expand...
that is why we accept it when a woman says she was abused. Ford had nothing to gain and much to lose. why would she lie and make up such a story? Even a right-wing nut like you can see what Kavanaugh had to gain, and he got it. Is here DNA evidence? Of course not. I was 30 years ago. What would this evidence you bleat about look like?that does not mean it did not happen. Ford was entirely believeable. Brett had lots of lies escpae his food hole. He lied about his whole history. Bu he fought off those terrible dangerous Clintons who were in the hearing room directing the conspiracy against him. How that poor man got through those powers aligned against him is a real profile in courage.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
you accept it because there is no evidence?.......how odd you silly fuckers are........
Click to expand...

Look you dumb shit, when 2 guys attack a woman in private, what possible evidence can there be? Give an example or stop talking stupidly. Bretts buddy would have to give him up. He was hiding out and protecting himself. You not only say dumb shit, but repeat your ignorance over and over. Ford had everything to lose and she did. Kavanaugh had a seat on the Supremes. Can you figure out which one was most likely telling the truth? Who had a motive? Do you understand motives and gains? Do you understand anyhing?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top