Trump found guilty then not guilty!

Tobytone said:
SORRY, I apologized and everything, but you couldn't gracefully accept. Regardless of what you think, I did go through all of the 'peoples' evidence, ( I know this is surprising to Libtards because they never actually look into things for themselves, they're parrots, remember ) and you're right, it is suppose to back up testimony. If the jury wasn't so obviously a bunch of Trump haters I'd feel sorry for them having to go through the piles of useless 'evidence' that in large part is not at all related to charges.

Like I said, I'm very confident along with many legal scholars and real attorneys, actual legal experts, not Libtards trying their best to sound intelligent on CNN or MSNBC. (or drones like you) My challenge still stands, and feel free to copy/paste several pieces of evidence that you see as important. Oh and you don't need to lecture me on how things are done by the jury, I've had the pleasure.
Click to expand...
You are confident since you haven't looked at everything the jury heard. Then you call me names because I am more familiar with the actual evidence, court rulings and jury verdict than you are.

What challenge still stands? You lied more than once about the trial. Until you actually correct all your lies and stick to the truth, your challenge seems to be that you are not honest with yourself or with others.

You asked what felonies Trump was charged with. When told you called me names.
You made a false statement in your next question when you said another crime was added to the charges. It wasn't.
You made a false claim when you said Bragg extended the statute of limitations. He didn't.
You used the word "lawfare" which doesn't exist in the legal world and has no bearing on Trump's trial.
You were wrong about evidence not being available.
You were wrong about the court transcripts not being available. (You used an AI for your information rather than doing the work yourself. )
You accused the jury which Trump's lawyers were able to question during voi dior of being biased with no evidence of that. Were Trump's lawyers incompetent?

You are relying on the opinions of others that were published in the media while they were trying to sound intelligent rather than doing any of the work yourself. Somehow you think that makes you more informed after you claimed others were relying on the media for their information.


This is your alleged apology - Not exactly a gracious apology.
You are right, I always admit when I'm wrong, which, I've never seen a Libtard do the same
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
You are confident since you haven't looked at everything the jury heard. Then you call me names because I am more familiar with the actual evidence, court rulings and jury verdict than you are.

What challenge still stands? You lied more than once about the trial. Until you actually correct all your lies and stick to the truth, your challenge seems to be that you are not honest with yourself or with others.

You asked what felonies Trump was charged with. When told you called me names.
You made a false statement in your next question when you said another crime was added to the charges. It wasn't.
You made a false claim when you said Bragg extended the statute of limitations. He didn't.
You used the word "lawfare" which doesn't exist in the legal world and has no bearing on Trump's trial.
You were wrong about evidence not being available.
You were wrong about the court transcripts not being available. (You used an AI for your information rather than doing the work yourself. )
You accused the jury which Trump's lawyers were able to question during voi dior of being biased with no evidence of that. Were Trump's lawyers incompetent?

You are relying on the opinions of others that were published in the media while they were trying to sound intelligent rather than doing any of the work yourself. Somehow you think that makes you more informed after you claimed others were relying on the media for their information.


This is your alleged apology - Not exactly a gracious apology.
You are right, I always admit when I'm wrong, which, I've never seen a Libtard do the same
Click to expand...

Funny, nice list, talk about reaching to make it seem like I got so much wrong. lol

For example, the actual thing Trump did wasn't a crime let alone a felony, it took Bragg being let's say...creative to come up with a reason to 'stretch the statute of limitations' he didn't even bother to prove it with the so-called "evidence" I looked through. Like I pointed out, even the NYC justice department, which is about as left-wing as it gets, looked at everything and decided not to proceed.

When I asked for the felonies he was charged with, I told you it was a simple question, I just wanted to walk you through it like you're a toddler. I didn't hide that fact. And that 'lawfare' comment? It's like a flashing neon sign saying you're a Libtard, so forgive me for being right on the money. Any non-libtard knows what the term means and that it's the playbook for Biden's admin. So, don't blame me for calling you a Libtard; you did that to yourself.

I was wrong about the transcripts and apologized, granted I did accurately label you a libtard in the process, but that doesn't mean I'm any less sorry for my mistake, and I thanked you for the link. I then dove into every single day's evidence and went through them all. It was a comedy goldmine. I highly recommend anyone that reads this do the same.

Finally, the jury: it's true that Trump's team got to deny and pick from the jury pool, as I said, I've been on a jury and know how this shitshow works. All I'll say is, it doesn't matter how many they deny if the whole pool in and outside the courtroom is full of Trump Derangement Syndrome patients; they'd say anything just to get a shot at Trump. The fact is, Trump's team made a very compelling case for moving the trial that had it been anyone but Trump, that request would have been granted for obvious reasons of the extensive media coverage and the predominantly left wing TDS libtards in NYC. If you're honest you know that's true.

All of that said, it's clearly pointless to continue this Libtard dance, as it usually is. I asked you for what you thought was the most compelling evidence, whether it was one single thing or a group of as many as you like. I actually did read it, I doubt you have, if you have, you know there isn't shit worth a damn for evidence. That's never been more crystal clear thanks to you giving me that link.

We'll just have to wait for the appeals, and I'll eat a big handful of shit if I'm wrong, but only if you do the same. To be clear, only when the case makes it to the SC if necessary.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Yep, Merchan just made a farce into a surreal farce of a farce. He's given Trump "Unconditional discharge" in his criminal case. That is, Trump is guilty of 34 felonies but will not be sentenced to a day in prison, a dollar's fine, or any other penalty. How cool is that? I bet every criminal wants that sort of outcome!

abcnews.go.com

Live updates: Judge gives Trump 'unconditional discharge' to respect presidency

Get updates on the sentencing of President-elect Donald Trump in his criminal hush money case in New York.
abcnews.go.com abcnews.go.com

So, I guess in NY, the new standard is do the crime but don't do the time! Shoplifters are going to love this new paradigm!
Click to expand...
Nope, he's still guilty.
 
Now the judge and Bragg are hoping it all goes away now that the Party can't cover them via the Feds any more. A nice RICO trail is in their future.

DEms found two corrupt black dumbass hacks to do stupid corrupt crap in two separate states, NY and Georgia, and is now going to run away and leave them to swing. lol wonder how many were smart enough to tell the DNC to go fuck themselves and didn't fall for the scam.
 
RB 60 said:
No unbiased jury can go through 34 felonies in a mater of hours without being biased.
Click to expand...
Ya for sure, of course, the judge refused to move the trial when Trump's team requested it. Any non-libtard judge would easily understand the reality that a fair unbiased jury in NYC (Libtard capital) would be impossible to find, especially considering how much and how long the case was in the press. ANY other defendant and the request would have been granted, FOR SURE.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Trump is still a convicted felon. Whether you think the case is a farce doesn't change that fact.

Anyone writing fiction showing Trump could be re-elected after what he did would be laughed at for not being realistic. Unfortunately, the American voter has gone into the surreal.
Click to expand...
Not really.
Republicans tried lawfare against Clinton and it backfired.
History repeated itself.
And guess what?
This is the second time in my lifetime that dims nominated someone that received zero votes in the democratic primaries.
And the second time THAT backfired.
American voters showed they’re wise to your ploys.
 
Diesel said:
Yeah, it's shit like this that proves you were never a Democrat, so why lie? You are a full blood MAGAt and a thoroughly disgusting person. Please go call some other female rape victims gold digging liars. You're blinded by your stupidity and your addiction to alt right media.
Click to expand...
All MAGAts, like their Orange Jesus, are liars. Most are petty criminals too if not actual criminals like rapists and thieves.

On JPP, most fit a singular demographic: elderly Euro-American males. Often crippled in mind and body.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
It's easy when the 34 felonies are all exactly the same felony. Charge stacking makes it super easy! Bragg essentially charged Trump with the equivalent of robbing a liquor store 34 times because he took 34 minutes to do it.
Click to expand...
Soooooo, according to you, Terry, a person who robs 34 people in a restaurant holdup should only face one charge, not 34. Interesting defense, but I disagree.
 
RB 60 said:
Nope. Playin' out in the street. You couldn't handle my wheelchair, it would kill you.
Click to expand...
Because you bought a Trump wheelchair? The one with square wheels?


9ges3b.jpg
 
Tobytone said:
Where have you vanished to? I see the little Libtard minions are smacking that 'like' button with the enthusiasm of trained seals. lol

What a pity you scurried away before I could dive into the tough questions ( by Libtard standards ). Come on back so we can decide who should lose their voting rights and if you deserve a one-way ticket to Libtard island. lol
Click to expand...
Do you understand what Trump was convicted of now?
 
Tobytone said:
Typical drone response, I noticed libtards can't answer the question, and as I stated, it is an easy one, or should be. I need to guide the ultra slow Libtard logic through this step by step. You can use left wing articles or help from you parents, whatever a libtard needs. But, you need to stay focused. I will guide you to the truth if you can follow simple instructions.
Click to expand...
You sure are a smarmy cunt for being a misinformed idiot. Bragg did not extend any statute of limitation. Cuomo did for the pandemic.
 
Earl said:
The patio of my favorite Mexican restaurant has three (3) inches of snow.

We start hoarding food at one inch…or even snow flurries.
Click to expand...
Ours is under a roof and has plastic power walls and heating. So it's sunny and warm and enjoyable. The bulldog was wearing a sweater because the outside was cold. I get you about the snow flurries. We made sure we were well stocked for the snowmagedon.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top