"Trump Said Campaign Finance Violations Aren't a Crime"

From what I gather there’s a diversity of opinion on the campaign finance aspect. Cohen has other issues beyond that.

For example, Dershowitz thinks neither Trump nor Cohen broke any laws with paying Stormy. So what happens if Dershowitz was judge? Does he accept the plea?

You’ll do the ad hom on Dershowitz, but the guy is a respected Harvard Law professor. That tells me this isn’t the slam dunk it’s being portrayed as by all the lefty media hopefuls.

Dershowitz is an outlier who seems to be an imperial presidency advocate. He never finds fault with what presidents do, especially what Daffy does.
 
Nice moral guy there Edwards. Kicking his cancer stricken wife to the curb. For "love". STFU you idiot.

I don't like Edwards, never did, even when he ran with KERRY. But there is more to that story, sadly, than just his wife having cancer. But you are right, he could have waited till she died.
 
You wouldn’t say that if he agreed with you lol.

You birds are acting like they got Cohen by blowing big numbers on a DUI check. This isn’t that cut and dry.

Its enough for a jury to decide. Its a strong case.
 
the Dems should run on impeachment..PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE.. you know you want it, so say it

I absolutely want it.

Conservatives are under the mistaken impression that because when Clinton was impeached, his approval rating shot up, so therefore the same will happen with Trump. Only, the two aren't comparable because:

1) Clinton didn't have a net negative approval rating when he was impeached. In fact, he had about a 50%-35% split. Trump's numbers are the reverse of that.
2) Clinton had a strong economy that was creating jobs during the largest economic expansion in a generation, Trump's economy is weak and bolstered by an inflated GDP to avoid tariffs and a job creation rate at its slowest pace in 7 years.
3) Clinton was well-liked and had a good personality. Trump is an oafish buffoon and criminal.

Conservatives are binary thinkers and think because X happened 20 years ago, that means the same thing will happen today.

How did impeachment work out for Andrew Johnson? Did it make him more popular?
 
I absolutely want it.

Conservatives are under the mistaken impression that because when Clinton was impeached, his approval rating shot up, so therefore the same will happen with Trump. Only, the two aren't comparable because:

1) Clinton didn't have a net negative approval rating when he was impeached. In fact, he had about a 50%-35% split. Trump's numbers are the reverse of that.
2) Clinton had a strong economy that was creating jobs during the largest economic expansion in a generation, Trump's economy is weak and bolstered by an inflated GDP to avoid tariffs and a job creation rate at its slowest pace in 7 years.
3) Clinton was well-liked and had a good personality. Trump is an oafish buffoon and criminal.

Conservatives are binary thinkers and think because X happened 20 years ago, that means the same thing will happen today.

How did impeachment work out for Andrew Johnson? Did it make him more popular?
the underlying charges wold be about personal sex for both Clinton and Trump/ I beg the Dems to impeach.
 
Good strategy/ fake news won't report on the diplomatic and economic success we are enjoyin

What successes?

Diplomatically, Trump hasn't accomplished anything. In fact, he's driven allies away from us, and ceded trade ground in the Pacific to China.

Economically, real wages for most workers have declined, while the GDP growth rate for Q2 was inflated by nearly a full point because of businesses rushing to get exports out ahead of the tariffs. That means bad, bad news for Q3 as orders will be cut, exports will drop, and consumer prices will spike because of the tariffs. 2018 is also the slowest pace of job creation since 2017, which was the slowest since 2011. The deficit is back to $1T, 4 million people lost health insurance, and premium increases this fall will be the highest since before the ACA. Oh, and companies are still outsourcing jobs.

Bravo.
 
first off -despite your hyperventilations none of this is clear. Allan Dershowitz (SP) and others have been tearing that argument apart.

No...it's just been Dershowitz and the morons at Fox News. No actual, credible lawyers say that using campaign dollars to pay for the silence of porn stars is legal.
 
and there was no trial on this -only what the prosecutor insisisted that Cohen say for the plea

That's how plea deals work, genius.


Cohen can say anything - so can the prosecutor,but we already know Mueller is out to kill Trump

Such a drama queen!

Mueller's not out to kill Trump, he's out to investigate and prosecute those who worked and colluded with Russia to manipulate the election. If you think that means he wants to kill Trump, then you have a screw loose.


But impeachment by the Dems is a done deal yes? so there are your gutless Democrats

I think they should call your bluff. I think you think that because Clinton got more popular after he was impeached, the same thing will happen for Trump. Not sure why you think that. How did impeachment work out for Andrew Johnson's popularity and legacy?
 
What successes?

Diplomatically, Trump hasn't accomplished anything. In fact, he's driven allies away from us, and ceded trade ground in the Pacific to China.

Economically, real wages for most workers have declined, while the GDP growth rate for Q2 was inflated by nearly a full point because of businesses rushing to get exports out ahead of the tariffs. That means bad, bad news for Q3 as orders will be cut, exports will drop, and consumer prices will spike because of the tariffs. 2018 is also the slowest pace of job creation since 2017, which was the slowest since 2011. The deficit is back to $1T, 4 million people lost health insurance, and premium increases this fall will be the highest since before the ACA. Oh, and companies are still outsourcing jobs.

Bravo.
he hasn't driven anyone away. that is a complete fabrication. Diplomacy has stopped rockets from being fired over Japan and air raid sirens in Hawaii. you are going to see a 3% annual GDP.

wages are just beginning to come up. GDP and wages were stagnant under Obama
 
Too bad that would be unconstitutional, in the view of the Justice Department.


The Justice Department decides what is Constitutional and what isn't Constitutional now? I thought that was the job of the US Supreme Court.

So according to you, the Justice Department could rule that Roe v Wade is illegal?
 
the underlying charges wold be about personal sex for both Clinton and Trump

So what?

Do you honestly believe that because Clinton became more popular after he was impeached, the same thing will happen for Trump?

You seem to be ignoring all the variables that distinguish the differences between the two situations; Clinton was already a popular President, with a thriving economy, who had a personality people liked. Trump is not a popular President, has a struggling economy, and has a personality most people abhor.

So walk me through how impeachment would be a net positive for Trump and the Conservatives.
 
So what?

Do you honestly believe that because Clinton became more popular after he was impeached, the same thing will happen for Trump?

You seem to be ignoring all the variables that distinguish the differences between the two situations; Clinton was already a popular President, with a thriving economy, who had a personality people liked. Trump is not a popular President, has a struggling economy, and has a personality most people abhor.

So walk me through how impeachment would be a net positive for Trump and the Conservatives.

you do realize your triggered asinine posts make you look like a little dweeb,

you throw around "most people" like you actually know hat you're talking about.
you sound stupid, stop it, for your own sake
 
The Justice Department decides what is Constitutional and what isn't Constitutional now? I thought that was the job of the US Supreme Court.

So according to you, the Justice Department could rule that Roe v Wade is illegal?

No, but they make their own policy on what actions they permit in individual cases based on their opinion of what is Constitutional. They have a policy against indicting a sitting president.
 
Back
Top