Trump's are 2 Types of supporters ... which one are you?

[LV426]

It doesn't work that way.

So ultimately, we have to take your word for it because that's what you're using as the basis of support for your case. But you're also saying that your word is sacrosanct and infallible and nowhere in any definition, legal or otherwise, would you be allowed to lie about yourself in court.

That's why you refuse to disclose who you really are; you know you're not who you claim to be and since you've hinged so much on your personal credibility in this debate, undermining your credibility ends up undermining your argument, and thus we are left with you saying things about yourself that you know you can't prove.

But it's all good because it moves the argument to grounds I want to be on; credibility. I know it's a subject that you have little experience in, which is why I'm glad we got here. So now this debate becomes about whether or not you can be trusted. So far, you haven't given any indication you can. And if you cannot be trusted, neither can your argument.

 

[MAGA MAN]

So ultimately, we have to take your word for it ...

Actually no....

 

[MAGA MAN]

LOL! We're not in a civil court, we're on an internet forum. And there's nothing convincing about the evidence you've presented, that you likely stole from someone else.

OK. Therefore the evidence standard is lower.

 

[LV426]

According to you....

You're damn right. Because now we are debating whether or not you are being truthful on a message board. And I come into that debate on a position of strength because the only, certifiable, 100% verifiable way for you to establish your credibility is to cease being anonymous, which you refuse to do.

So if you refuse to be anonymous, why the hell should we believe anything you say about yourself and by extension, why should we trust in any of the arguments you're making?

This is kinda fun.

However you were the one making the original claim. Therefore you are the one, by your own definition, with no credibility here.

My claim was that I didn't believe you and that I thought you were lying. To prove that claim, you helped me by avoiding doxxing yourself. I think it's pretty obvious why you don't want to reveal your true name and identity; you're not half the person you claim to be.

What a fraud.

 

[MAGA MAN]

You're damn right. Because now we are debating whether or not you are being truthful on a message board. And I come into that debate on a position of strength because the only, certifiable, 100% verifiable way for you to establish your credibility is to cease being anonymous, which you refuse to do.

So if you refuse to be anonymous, why the hell should we believe anything you say about yourself and by extension, why should we trust in any of the arguments you're making?

This is kinda fun.




My claim was that I didn't believe you and that I thought you were lying. To prove that claim, you helped me by avoiding doxxing yourself. I think it's pretty obvious why you don't want to reveal your true name and identity; you're not half the person you claim to be.

What a fraud.

LOL. According to you.

 

[LV426]

Actually no....

Actually, yes. Because you refuse to certify who you claim to be. So if you refuse to do that, all we're left with is you and your word. And why the fuck should I trust the word of someone unwilling to back those words up?

It's almost exactly what happened when I had to work on the Boonstra thing. She absolutely refused to certify what she was claiming. Then we went to the insurance company, who verified everything, and Boonstra's response was that she didn't believe it.

 

[LV426]

OK. Therefore the evidence standard is lower.

LOL!

Your argument is now for low standards?!

Way to set that low bar for yourself. Totally convincing too.

 

[LV426]

LOL. According to you.

Poseur. Fraud. Liar.

You're so pathetic you have to invent a character on the internet just so you can feel better about your own shitty, underachieving life.

 

[MAGA MAN]

Actually, yes. Because you refuse to certify who you claim to be. ...

I don't claim to be anyone, just not the person of the means that you accused me of here:

Dark Souls lives in the Blue Ridge mountains because he cannot afford to live anywhere else. Those welfare checks aren't that big.

I've never taken a GovCo handout and I don't qualify. I never have.

 

[MAGA MAN]

LOL!

Your argument is now for low standards?!

Way to set that low bar for yourself. Totally convincing too.

You don't seem to understand basic English. I advocated for a legal standard and you asked for something lower. That doesn't mean that I changed my position.

You must have a hard time tying your shoes.

 

[MAGA MAN]

Poseur. Fraud. Liar.

You're so pathetic you have to invent a character on the internet just so you can feel better about your own shitty, underachieving life.

The irony of your post most likely escapes you. LOL!

 

[MAGA MAN]

To recap.

Here's how it started:

You're a racist for saying POC are POS.

The premise is false, therefore his conclusion has no merit.

Then:

You're a fascist.

No evidence provided, therefore the accusation is declared false due to lack of anything to make a judgement on.

Next:

They'd have to remove the roof from your house in order for you to be able to get out and put up a fight.

Some kind of odd veiled threat, I guess. 'Oh no- he's a scary Hollywood monster'. LOL!

Finally, out of shear desperation:

Dark Souls [sic] lives in the Blue Ridge mountains because he cannot afford to live anywhere else. Those welfare checks aren't that big.

An accusation which he has failed to prove, yet desires me to disprove, "beyond a reasonable doubt", to his judgement alone, insisting on knowing my contact information.

I've already had one pussy fill my mailbox up with his dog's poop this week, and I don't need another skulking around here in the dark.

Obviously we are dealing with a petulant child here.

Poor little LV. Must stand for Little Virgin.

 

[hvilleherb]

How many coal miners did Hillary promise to put back to work?

 

[Cypress]

I think being a billionaire and being stupid are not mutually exclusive.

Actually, I think peer reviewed science has boiled it down to racism and misogyny. So, you could actually think of Trump supporters either being from the Archie Bunker tradition, or the Al Bundy school.

 

[MAGA MAN]

Poor little LV. Must stand for Little Virgin.

.

 

[LV426]

I don't claim to be anyone, just not the person of the means that you accused me of here:

You claimed to be in the 1%, live in Blue Ridge, then you claimed that you had two homes.

It's all bullshit, isn't it? You were just playing pretend, weren't you? This was just role playing for you, wasn't it? Be honest.

 

[LV426]

I've never taken a GovCo handout and I don't qualify. I never have.

Bullshit. If you live in Georgia, you get government handouts by default because Georgia isn't a maker state...it's a taker state, one that takes more from the Treasury than it contributes.

 

[LV426]

You don't seem to understand basic English. I advocated for a legal standard and you asked for something lower. That doesn't mean that I changed my position.

You must have a hard time tying your shoes.

LOL!

Your defense of pretending to be something you're not on a message board is that you can do that because the standards are low.

So you're totally playing pretend, then. You admit it yourself. You won't hold yourself to a higher standard.

 

[LV426]

The irony of your post most likely escapes you. LOL!

I'm not the one who pretended to be something I'm not, then changed my story halfway through when I was reminded of certain things like Blue Ridge being a poverty region. You're a fraud, a phony, and a liar. And like how I can only assume you live your life, you do a half-assed job of all of it.

 

[LV426]

The premise is false, therefore his conclusion has no merit.

You said that POC = POS. That is what you said when you warped and re-wrote what I wrote with your FIFY.