Trump’s lawsuit against Bob Woodward is absurd — and dangerous

LurchAddams said:
Publishing twumps own words is not liable. They're twump's words.
Click to expand...

So this "twump" is Woodward's hallucination, then?

The problem is that Woodward repeatedly lies to defame the last legitimate president. The lack of integrity by the DNC controlled press is legendary - Stalin's Russian and Hitler's Reich had more a more accurate news media than the democrat Reich press.

Woodward has a long history of lies and demagoguery - he even smeared Obama - and got smacked down for it.

He figured with the insanity of the democrat Reich - he could tell any lie he wanted to make up - now he has to answer for those lies in court.
 
Trump - 'How dare you quote me from an interview I agreed to'

You can't make this stuff up. It's surreal.
 
BidenPresident said:
Donald Trump’s public words — speeches, interviews and written statements — were an essential record of his presidential campaign and four years in the Oval Office. But judging by a lawsuit Mr. Trump filed against our colleague Bob Woodward and his book publisher, Simon & Schuster, the former president thinks he personally owns the words he spoke while president. This is absurd — and intended to intimidate and harass.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/02/06/trump-lawsuit-bob-woodward-audio-tapes/
Click to expand...

The grifter has used lawsuits his entire life to intimidate, harass, and get out of trouble. This one will fail.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
Trump isn't the defendant - dumbfuck.

Woodwards defense: Sure, I made it up - it's what I do....
Click to expand...

How could Woodward make up Trump's voice on tape? The suit is because Woodward put the actual tapes of him talking to Trump into an audiobook.

Trump tried to claim he has a copyright on tapes Woodward made. That is nonsense.
Trump tried to claim he only agreed to one book when he agreed to be interviewed. Unless there is a written contract, Woodward can do what he wants with the tapes.

Trump is the one filing a frivolous lawsuit. He will lose.
 
BidenPresident said:
A president is entitled to private deliberations and to write his own memoirs. But in speaking on the record to a journalist, Mr. Trump was engaging in the well-worn practice of defending his record, using the interview to communicate and govern. If such activity was proprietary, then every interview might require payment to the president for his words. It would privatize what is a very public responsibility.

Then again, Mr. Trump has long failed to respect the distinction between public service and private gain. “Everything is mine,” he said in one interview in a near-whisper to Mr. Woodward.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/02/06/trump-lawsuit-bob-woodward-audio-tapes/
Click to expand...


The problem is that Woodward blatantly lied about what Trump said.

Trump has several problems in this suit though;

1. We don't have a legitimate system of jurisprudence. Our courts are corrupt at an institutional level. George Soros, as the face of the ruling Oligarchs, has corrupted our courts at every level. Party members are not subject to laws. Trump will have to draw a judge that is not in the pocket of the Soros machine - about a 3 in 10 chance on an honest draw.

2. Trump's lawyers must show actual harm. While there is no question that Woodward lied - in order for the court to apply a remedy, Trump must show that the slander by Woodward did either financial or professional harm. Trump can argue that the defamation by Woodward caused him to lose the election, but that would have to balance the claim that the massive fraud by the democrats caused his defeat versus the campaign of slander by Woodward.

3. Trump is a public figure. The bar is set higher for defamation suits when the plaintiff is a public figure.
 
Nordberg said:
Woodward has the fucking tapes you dumb shits. Woodward did an audiobook with Trump tapes.
Click to expand...

Tapes which don't support the slander in his books.

I get that you're a mindless sycophant who has spent years on a 24/7 hate against the enemy of your Reich. The reality is that Woodward did what Woodward does - lied.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
Tapes which don't support the slander in his books.

I get that you're a mindless sycophant who has spent years on a 24/7 hate against the enemy of your Reich. The reality is that Woodward did what Woodward does - lied.
Click to expand...

Of course they do. Which is why it isn't defamation. But good luck to your hero. Maybe after 678 losses he'll win one. Or not.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
How could Woodward make up Trump's voice on tape?
Click to expand...

Ohhh look, a staw man.

As close to logic as Nazi democrats ever get.

The suit is because Woodward put the actual tapes of him talking to Trump into an audiobook.
Click to expand...

The suit is for the slanderous statements that Woodward adds which are nowhere on these tapes - try and follow along.

Trump tried to claim he has a copyright on tapes Woodward made. That is nonsense.
Trump tried to claim he only agreed to one book when he agreed to be interviewed. Unless there is a written contract, Woodward can do what he wants with the tapes.

Trump is the one filing a frivolous lawsuit. He will lose.
Click to expand...


Trump very well may lose, not for the reasons you ignorantly claim - but for reasons I've outlined in a different post.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
Ohhh look, a staw man.

As close to logic as Nazi democrats ever get.



The suit is for the slanderous statements that Woodward adds which are nowhere on these tapes - try and follow along.




Trump very well may lose, not for the reasons you ignorantly claim - but for reasons I've outlined in a different post.
Click to expand...

ROFLMAO..
So the suit he filed is for something that is never mentioned in the suit?

The suit is here:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flnd.456079/gov.uscourts.flnd.456079.1.0.pdf

There is no mention of slander or defamation in the lawsuit. The word copyright is mentioned 20 times with Trump claiming
They brazenly refused to recognize President
Trump’s copyright and contractual rights.

It would seem the only strawman we are seeing is your claim that Trump is suing for slander.
 
Concart said:
Of course they do. Which is why it isn't defamation. But good luck to your hero. Maybe after 678 losses he'll win one. Or not.
Click to expand...

The judge in the preliminary found ample evidence that they don't - so the suit goes forward.

That's what you Nazis are melting down about in this thread.

If it were as the hivemind programmed you to believe, the suit would have been dismissed.
 
Incoming Sanctions to be ordered for Trump to pay for all the legal costs of yet another frivolous lawsuit that will go no where.

Now that seal is broken, and a Court has issued a 'Finding' that Trump is a serial abusing litigant, with a tactic of filling abusive frivolous lawsuits, we should see other judges referencing and building on that with similar findings and judgement awards against him.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
The judge in the preliminary found ample evidence that they don't - so the suit goes forward.

That's what you Nazis are melting down about in this thread.

If it were as the hivemind programmed you to believe, the suit would have been dismissed.
Click to expand...

Nope. You don't know anything about the law. There has been no ruling. The suit was filed less than a week ago. Get a clue. Read a book. Anything so you don't come here and post unadulterated bullshit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top