Trump’s lawsuit against Bob Woodward is absurd — and dangerous

Uncensored2008 said:
And by "defend," you mean my stating "Trump may very well lose."

Just post "Seig Heil," it captures the true spirit of your party. Let's face it, every post by every democrat drone boils down to it, anyway.
Click to expand...

Vv3mPOi.jpg
 
Trumpet said:
Uncensored2008 being not to bright is typical of the Magatards.
Click to expand...

Nope. I can't wait till he invites all his tard friends to a book burning featuring Woodward and all those kiddie books that scare DeSantis. It will be fun to watch them burn e-readers. I hope there's a YT video. :laugh:
 
Uncensored2008 said:
So, the judge DID find sufficient cause for the suit to go forward - hence the meltdown by the fascists here...


Bit of unsolicited advice - smarmy doesn't work for you - for REALLY obvious reasons....
Click to expand...

No the judge hasn’t looked at the case. Probably one hasn’t been assigned. Like I said…read a book. Law for dummies would be a good place to start.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
The judge in the preliminary found ample evidence that they don't - so the suit goes forward.

That's what you Nazis are melting down about in this thread.

If it were as the hivemind programmed you to believe, the suit would have been dismissed.
Click to expand...

What preliminary?

The only document so far is the suit itself. It was just filed with the court in the last week. I have seen no evidence of a judge even being assigned the case. A judge doesn't rule on anything until the person being sued has a chance to respond.

My guess is the first response filing by Woodward and Simon and Schuster will be to claim that the suit is filed in the wrong venue since the tapes were done in DC and the book was published in NY. For that matter Trump doesn't live in the northern district of Florida (not NY). At that point Trump's lawyers will have to defend why they didn't file where the actions supposedly took place.

Edit - The case was filed in the northern district of Florida, not the northern district of NY.
 
Last edited:
Poor Richard Saunders said:
What preliminary?

The only document so far is the suit itself. It was just filed with the court in the last week. I have seen no evidence of a judge even being assigned the case. A judge doesn't rule on anything until the person being sued has a chance to respond.

My guess is the first response filing by Woodward and Simon and Schuster will be to claim that the suit is filed in the wrong venue since the tapes were done in DC and the book was published in NY. For that matter Trump doesn't live in the northern district of NY. At that point Trump's lawyers will have to defend why they didn't file where the actions supposedly took place.
Click to expand...
Trump and his lawyers have made this mistake before, obviously learning nothing from their mistakes.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Nope. I can't wait till he invites all his tard friends to a book burning featuring Woodward and all those kiddie books that scare DeSantis. It will be fun to watch them burn e-readers. I hope there's a YT video. :laugh:
Click to expand...

Book burning and banning seems more in line with you Nazis.

Oh, wait, there’s more. We have now learned that the supposedly highly principled American Civil Liberties Union apparently is in favor of banning books that don’t conform to the accepted views of at least one of its lawyers, a transgender man named Chase Strangio. The ACLU and Mr. Strangio’s discontent involves a book by Abigail Shrier called “Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters.” In it, she makes the case that while adults should have the freedom to undergo medical transition, teenagers are a different matter.

In a Wall Street Journal op-ed, she wrote: “Social contagions exist, and teen girls are particularly susceptible to them. The book takes a hard look at whether the sudden spike in transgender identification among teen girls is yet another social contagion to befall girls who, in another era, might have fallen prey to anorexia or bulimia.”

You’d think that liberals — at the ACLU, of all places — would defend an author’s right to make her case, whether it agreed with that case or not. But not Chase Strangio, who serves as the ACLU’s deputy director for transgender justice. “Abigail Shrier’s book is a dangerous polemic with a goal of making people not trans,” he tweeted. “I think of all the times & ways I was told my transness wasn’t real & the daily toll it takes. We have to fight these ideas which are leading to the criminalization of trans life again.”

Then, just to make sure we understand what Mr. Strangio means when he says “we have to fight these ideas,” he goes on to say: “Stopping the circulation of this book and these ideas is 100% a hill I will die on.”

“You read that right,” Ms. Shrier wrote in her op-ed. “Some in today’s ACLU favor book banning.”}

https://thehill.com/opinion/campaig...m-curb-speech-ban-books-make-an-enemies-list/

This isn't porn in elementary schools - but actual book banning from all avenues and outlets.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top