US 'no longer technology king'

Superfreak said:
"Translation: We have an anti-science republican government. A government that doesn't believe in stem cell research, alternative energy, global warming, or evolution."

Translation of translation: I am a Democrat and I will exagerate the truth or outright lie, because it makes me feel warm and cozy inside.

1) The government funds many lines of stem cell research. They do not fund embryonic stem cell research. Big exageration on your part... and a very common ploy by the left.

**Yes, and what do they do with those embryonic cells? Couple have a number of choices, a.) Dispose of them b.) donate them to infertile couples c.) Donate them for research d.) have them preserved.

Now which of these choices is the most popular?**



2) This government has invested more than any other in alternative energy. Are they perfect? No. But a gross exageration on your part yet again.... another typical line of BS from the left.


***Bush has increased the funds for hydrogen cells.***

3) Global warming. Give you this one, until recently it was true. The left will continue trying to force consensus that Man is the primary source of warming, rather than focusing all efforts on eliminating as much air, water and land pollution as possible. Thus wasting valuable resources on one pointless study after another.

4) You will need to show me evidence that the majority of Republicans think that evolution has not occured.

Polls show between 73% of the Republicans, 58% of Democrats and 57% of Indenpendant, believe in Creationism. Now I understand why I don't register with any of these folks.

44%-47% of the people in the United States believe the Earth is less than 10,000 years old...Harris poll conducted from 1982-2006. Pew poll showed the same, but CNN-Gallop poll done in 2006 showed between 51%-53%

5) Bottom line: this government is not "anti-science". Science has bounced up against morality before. Some do not believe that science should be able to do whatever it chooses.
Click to expand...

***See after your statements***

Since the Reagan administration science has been taking a backseat in America. All this teaching to the test is killing our kids imagination and creative thinking. It is very sad and I am glad my children are educated or
are presently in college. I will fight to see that my granddaughter gets a good education, even if it means supplementing at home which is a parents job, anyway, we are their first and always teachers.
 
Superfreak said:
"Translation: We have an anti-science republican government. A government that doesn't believe in stem cell research, alternative energy, global warming, or evolution."

Translation of translation: I am a Democrat and I will exagerate the truth or outright lie, because it makes me feel warm and cozy inside.

1) The government funds many lines of stem cell research. They do not fund embryonic stem cell research. Big exageration on your part... and a very common ploy by the left.

**Yes, and what do they do with those embryonic cells? Couple have a number of choices, a.) Dispose of them b.) donate them to infertile couples c.) Donate them for research d.) have them preserved.

Now which of these choices is the most popular?**



2) This government has invested more than any other in alternative energy. Are they perfect? No. But a gross exageration on your part yet again.... another typical line of BS from the left.


***Bush has increased the funds for hydrogen cells.***

3) Global warming. Give you this one, until recently it was true. The left will continue trying to force consensus that Man is the primary source of warming, rather than focusing all efforts on eliminating as much air, water and land pollution as possible. Thus wasting valuable resources on one pointless study after another.

4) You will need to show me evidence that the majority of Republicans think that evolution has not occured.

Polls show between 73% of the Republicans, 58% of Democrats and 57% of Indenpendant, believe in Creationism. Now I understand why I don't register with any of these folks.

44%-47% of the people in the United States believe the Earth is less than 10,000 years old...Harris poll conducted from 1982-2006. Pew poll showed the same, but CNN-Gallop poll done in 2006 showed between 51%-53%

5) Bottom line: this government is not "anti-science". Science has bounced up against morality before. Some do not believe that science should be able to do whatever it chooses.
Click to expand...

***See after your statements***

Since the Reagan administration science has been taking a backseat in America. All this teaching to the test is killing our kids imagination and creative thinking. It is very sad and I am glad my children are educated or
are presently in college. I will fight to see that my granddaughter gets a good education, even if it means supplementing at home which is a parents job, anyway, we are their first and always teachers.
 
Superfreak said:
"Translation: We have an anti-science republican government. A government that doesn't believe in stem cell research, alternative energy, global warming, or evolution."

Translation of translation: I am a Democrat and I will exagerate the truth or outright lie, because it makes me feel warm and cozy inside.

1) The government funds many lines of stem cell research. They do not fund embryonic stem cell research. Big exageration on your part... and a very common ploy by the left.

**Yes, and what do they do with those embryonic cells? Couple have a number of choices, a.) Dispose of them b.) donate them to infertile couples c.) Donate them for research d.) have them preserved.

Now which of these choices is the most popular?**



2) This government has invested more than any other in alternative energy. Are they perfect? No. But a gross exageration on your part yet again.... another typical line of BS from the left.


***Bush has increased the funds for hydrogen cells.***

3) Global warming. Give you this one, until recently it was true. The left will continue trying to force consensus that Man is the primary source of warming, rather than focusing all efforts on eliminating as much air, water and land pollution as possible. Thus wasting valuable resources on one pointless study after another.

4) You will need to show me evidence that the majority of Republicans think that evolution has not occured.

Polls show between 73% of the Republicans, 58% of Democrats and 57% of Indenpendant, believe in Creationism. Now I understand why I don't register with any of these folks.

44%-47% of the people in the United States believe the Earth is less than 10,000 years old...Harris poll conducted from 1982-2006. Pew poll showed the same, but CNN-Gallop poll done in 2006 showed between 51%-53%

5) Bottom line: this government is not "anti-science". Science has bounced up against morality before. Some do not believe that science should be able to do whatever it chooses.
Click to expand...

***See after your statements***

Since the Reagan administration science has been taking a backseat in America. All this teaching to the test is killing our kids imagination and creative thinking. It is very sad and I am glad my children are educated or
are presently in college. I will fight to see that my granddaughter gets a good education, even if it means supplementing at home which is a parents job, anyway, we are their first and always teachers.
 
Topspin said:
Your clueless, I'm done debating you on economics
Keep your glass almost empty despite the obvious facts and I'll go with the prosperity of the greatest wealth creation in the History of the World.
Piece.
Click to expand...

Top! I have not said anything before because I really do dislike picking on people's grammar. And we all make mistakes, and God knows I make mine. And the most intelligent person I've ever known could not type worth a damn, and so spelling typos, I get.

But Top really. I hope you are not sending out business letters/emails like this. I would like ten minutes with you. We would straighten out first of all, the differences between, to and too. Then, we'd learn about they're, their, and there. And now I guess we can add, between peace, and piece.

I try not to be a nitpicker even though I'm a bit anal about these things, but you really are trying my grammar patience.
 
you are being anal

People hate to substantiate there positions with facts, attack spelling and gramar.

List the European companies better than the top 3 I listed in each category.
How tough can that be if we are not king anymore.

Also the other 24 country's combined having a higher market value than ours was laughable.:pke:
 
Topspin said:
you are being anal

People hate to substantiate there positions with facts, attack spelling and gramar.

List the European companies better than the top 3 I listed in each category.
How tough can that be if we are not king anymore.

Also the other 24 country's combined having a higher market value than ours was laughable.:pke:
Click to expand...

No. Look at you. You did it again. Top if you email business associates like this, you look stupid. Whether you are or not, that's how you look.

When you say "there positions" it is supposed to indicate a possesive. It's MY position. Therefore, you use "their". That is the possesive. There, indicates a place. I am going "there" on Saturday. They're, is the contraction for they are.

Please. Just clear this up for your own good. Someday, you'll thank me for it.
 
My brother, an extremely successful entrepreneur, did the same thing all of the time. I read an email he had sent to a customer, and cringed. I very gently told him what he had done, and he asked me to write down for him, how to use they're, there and their.

Because he didn't want to look stupid. He's not. He just didn't know.
 
avoidance again
I make 125,000 a year doing financial work.
Do you think after 24 yrs I need advice from a gerber who barely can talk economics about how to do my job. Thats laughable.
I'll take your resonse to mean you can't come up with facts and like most dems I'm trying to teach you resort to personal attacks like USC and lorax.
 
Topspin said:
avoidance again
I make 125,000 a year doing financial work.
Do you think after 24 yrs I need advice from a gerber who barely can talk economics about how to do my job. Thats laughable.
I'll take your resonse to mean you can't come up with facts and like most dems I'm trying to teach you resort to personal attacks like USC and lorax.
Click to expand...

I'm not attacking you. If you can't take constructive criticism without feeling under attack, that's your problem.

We all do it sometimes; that's called making a mistake. Sometimes I write, here for hear, when I'm writing quickly, it happens. But if you consistently display incorrect usage of those words, it makes you look uneducated. If that's ok with you, it's ok with me.
 
it is ok with me, you are a writer of course grammer is second nature to you.
less than 1% of my job is formal writing. I double check spell check, put it down and come back for a second review and if it's going to and executive I may get a peer to review.
My point is I don't think your showing concern, you are trying to get a cheap point cause you can't argue the economics.
I don't even check much less spell check my message board post.
I expect adults to consider the points made like I'm talking to them not act like a hs teachers aid.
 
Topspin said:
it is ok with me, you are a writer of course grammer is second nature to you.
less than 1% of my job is formal writing. I double check spell check, put it down and come back for a second review and if it's going to and executive I may get a peer to review.
My point is I don't think your showing concern, you are trying to get a cheap point cause you can't argue the economics.
I don't even check much less spell check my message board post.
I expect adults to consider the points made like I'm talking to them not act like a hs teachers aid.
Click to expand...

I am not trying to score a cheap point. Notice that I did not call you a gerber who doesn't know his ass from his elbow or shit from shinola, now did I? I'm not the cheap point King around here Top.

I'm sincere. And the next time you write an email, and you need to say "their profits" you will think about this despite yourself, and you'll do it correctly.
 
they count for me kicking your ass on every economics thread.
Yes you and Darla can wipe me out on a spelling be or grammer test.
? have you made any money with that skill. LOL
for the fith time, please name 3 European companies that are King over the american ones I listed.
 
Yes your a writer Duhla, obviously that was directed at USC.
Enlighten me with your European companies that are king over the american one oh learned one.
 
Topspin said:
Yes your a writer Duhla, obviously that was directed at USC.
Enlighten me with your European companies that are king over the american one oh learned one.
Click to expand...

Me, or usc?

If you're talking to me Top, I will make you a deal. You find the post where I made that claim in the first place, and then I'll find them.
 
you I would never call USC the learned one. The bitter one maybe. LOL

Europe is awesome and getting better. Because they are becoming more like us though. Japan too
 
Topspin said:
they count for me kicking your ass on every economics thread.
Yes you and Darla can wipe me out on a spelling be or grammer test.
? have you made any money with that skill. LOL
Click to expand...

I do every day. I write reports , emails and the like many times each day....
I make good money :D
 
I posted on the euorpean stocks surpassing the US ones. Since I am not a stock/business maggot err magnate I don't track the european ones since I do not even gamble in the stocks of the Eoropean big companies. To low a rate of return.
I just posted what other "experts" are saying.
 
Topspin said:
you I would never call USC the learned one. The bitter one maybe. LOL

Europe is awesome and getting better. Because they are becoming more like us though. Japan too
Click to expand...

I don't notice anything bitter about usc. He's very laid-back if you ask me. I like him. I don't dislike you top. I just enjoy making sport of you, not here about the grammar, but on other threads, about your portfolio and self-described genius.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top