VERDICT!

Steelplate said:
Innocent or not guilty? There is a difference....especially when the only other person who knows what happened fully is dead. I mean hell.....good for Zimmy....he beat yet ANOTHER rap...
Click to expand...

Well since their is no Jury decision for innocent, not guilty fills the bill.
Zimmerman is not a murderer, no matter how much you want it to be true.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Well since their is no Jury decision for innocent, not guilty fills the bill.
Zimmerman is not a murderer, no matter how much you want it to be true.
Click to expand...

I guess God will decide on that...I'm not saying he is or isn't...I wasn't there....were you? Why didn't you come forward when they were looking for witnesses?
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
OJ was found not guilty and whether people agree or not, he's not a murderer.
Zimmerman is not a murderer, no matter how may times you wish it were true.
Click to expand...

It has nothing to do with any wish. I wish he wasn't a murderer.

Say someone confesses in a way that makes it clear it is valid. But the guy is not properly mirandized or on some other technicality his testimony gets thrown out. Is he a murderer?

He's an unconvicted murderer.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Sorry buy you're guilty of unreasonable expectations. Mr. Zimmermans innocence is not under consideration of the standard by which our law operates by. The jury determined reasonable doubt existed. End of story. Get over it. The very fact that Mr. Zimmerman was brought to trial satisfies me.

To be honest with you.....If there had been an actual witness to the confrontation and killing I think Mr. Zimmerman would be singing a different tune tonight but that's not how it worked out. So be it.

If any good does come from this I hope that it is that community watch leaders learn from this experience and dedicate themselves to improving their screening methods so that they can detect and eliminate morons, like Mr. Zimmerman.
Click to expand...

You are reading something that is not present in anything I have written on this. I am fine with the verdict and can see how others may feel it was the right one.

I am not fine with the law, as it exists. It needs to be changed.

He's still a murderer. You seem to agree based on your statement about witnesses.
 
Professor Baxter said:
You are reading something that is not present in anything I have written on this. I am fine with the verdict and can see how others may feel it was the right one.

I am not fine with the law, as it exists. It needs to be changed.

He's still a murderer. You seem to agree based on your statement about witnesses.
Click to expand...

I'm not following here on the murderer definition. You say only if it's unlawful yet you still call him a murderer even though he was found not guilty of breaking the law. Is anyone who kills in self defense a murderer or are you using the term strictly for Zimmerman?

Edit: I'm not asking this because I find it offensive that you call Zimmerman a murderer. I don't care what people call him. I'm just asking based on your definition.
 
cawacko said:
I'm not following here on the murderer definition. You say only if it's unlawful yet you still call him a murderer even though he was found not guilty of breaking the law. Is anyone who kills in self defense a murderer or are you using the term strictly for Zimmerman?
Click to expand...

delete, duplicate post
 
I can honestly say, 100%, with all honesty, I am happier today than I was last christmas. And I fucking love christmas. I am beside myself. This is the happiest I have been all year.

The liars and the deceivers just got bitch slapped into submission. Trayvon is responsible for his own death. Zimmerman did nothing illegal and Trayvon violently attacked him. That's the facts. Deal with it.

But you know what? I have made that argument countless times before. But now I have a little something extra in my corner.

6 women.

A jury agreed on by both parties.

NOT GUILTY.

In believing zimmermans claim of self defense, THEY also are believing that trayvon was either committing a violent act that could threaten death, great bodily harm, or a forceable felony. Witnesses all stated as such, you can't sweep that away.

JUSTICE HAS BEEN SERVED.

The jury has spoken.

TEAM ZIMMERMAN 2013
 
Are you inferring that an all-female jury was the least equipped to handle the verdict rationally, Grind?

I think you need to speak privately with Darla. :nono:
 
cawacko said:
I'm not following here on the murderer definition. You say only if it's unlawful yet you still call him a murderer even though he was found not guilty of breaking the law. Is anyone who kills in self defense a murderer or are you using the term strictly for Zimmerman?

Edit: I'm not asking this because I find it offensive that you call Zimmerman a murderer. I don't care what people call him. I'm just asking based on your definition.
Click to expand...

He was found not guilty. That does not mean he did not break the law. I don't believe that he was justified in the use of deadly force and there is not yet any indication the jury did either (not that it matters).
 
The 6 women jury were highly methodical. They took a ton of notes, they were active, they were deliberate. The first thing they asked for was the entire evidence inventory list. They saw what any rational, logical person saw, that the prosecutions case was a joke. Even if you thought something bad about zimmerman, there was reasonable doubt out the ass.

No one that actually paid attention to the trial should have been shocked here.

This case should never have been brought, and as I said one year ago, it was overcharged. Everyone said otherwise, but once people started seeing the case crumble like wet tissue paper, only the truest of mouth breathers were thinking anything other than manslaughter.

The defense did more than get not guilty, they methodically proved zimmermans innocence. This is a GREAT day. Justice has been done. THe violent criminal is in the grave where he belongs, and the person that put him there is a free man.

As it should be.

As it should be.
 
Professor Baxter said:
He was found not guilty. That does not mean he did not break the law. I don't believe that he was justified in the use of deadly force and there is not yet any indication the jury did either (not that it matters).
Click to expand...

lmao

they found in favor of a justifiable homicide.

Even in defeat, you simply cannot accept reality.

Not guilty.

Say it 50 times, maybe it'll become a little clearer.

The best you can say now is they didn't declare him innocent beyond all doubt? That's your best argument?

I guess you have to hold on to something, in the wake of this utter decimation. It was only a week ago you still thought 2nd degree was in play. Jury blew by that in hours most likely, maybe minutes.

Team Zimmerman 2013.
 
Professor Baxter said:
Yay, grind! You did it! WTG!!! Do you want to thank anyone?

You really should get a t shirt to commemorate your victory in this struggle.

Loser.
Click to expand...

Cry more, I love the taste of your sweet sweet tears.

The violent criminal is dead.

The man who killed him is free

That is what I always said.

And that's how it should be.
 
I wonder what zimmerman will do tomorrow? Hug his family? Laugh? Watch a movie and relax? Breath the fresh air? Enjoy life?

I wonder what the violent criminal Trayvon will do tomorrow?

Oh wait, I forgot. Violent criminals that punch and physically assault people for doing nothing illegal are able to be legally killed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top