What Are The Ways The Cop Could Have Prevented The Stabbing?

ExpressLane said:
None of those are plausible.

At moments of adrenaline fueled rage people frequently get shot without even realizing it. The assailant and the victim were next to each other and had he tried to shot the knife hand or arm he would have very likely shot the girl in pink. If he had shot her in the leg it probably not stopped her from completing he deadly swing. Taser frequently don't work and would put the girl in pink at risk. A "judo" move? Seriously. The officer was 15 feet away and the girl was in mid swing. There is no way he could have stopped her in time.

I think most of us feel sorry for the assailant . She was a foster child and probably had a bad shake in life. But any 16 y.o. should know you should never pick up a knife and try to stab someone.
Click to expand...

Apparently you do not know what Judo entails and involves.

I'd love to see a demonstration.
 
AProudLefty said:
I don't need to watch the video over and over and over again. It is OBVIOUS the cop had 1/2 second to make a decision. So stop projecting your failures on me.

Now, do you think that shooting 4 times is excessive?
Click to expand...

THIS IS THE SPLIT SECOND; IS SHE ,OR IS SHE NOT IN THE PROCESS OF STABBING THE VICTIM...??

knife5.png



I THINK MAKING SURE THE VICTIM IS SAFE OUTWEGHS ANY COURTESIES FOR THE CRIMINALS.




SPARE US THE SILLIASS BULLSHIT, PLEASE....
 
Grokmaster said:

MIDSWING YOU STUPID FUCKING MORON. DO YOU HAVE TO TRUMPET YOUR IGNORANCE OF THE FACTS ON EVERY ISSUE, EVERYDAY?


WIDE ANGLE VIDEO IN LINK:

https://abc6onyourside.com/news/loc...umbus-police-shooting-makhia-bryant-4-22-2021



knife5.png
Click to expand...

Nope. She would have been stabbed. Nothing stops a midswing but bumping into something. You are incorrect because you can convince yourself of anything you wish. This is the latest example.
That is a still picture of her holding a knife.
Once again. Do not call me names. It does not buttress your argument and makes you look immature and childish. You may be a young teen or younger. But that is no excuse for such behavior.
 
Grokmaster said:

THIS IS THE SPLIT SECOND; IS SHE ,OR IS SHE NOT IN THE PROCESS OF STABBING THE VICTIM...??

I THINK MAKIONG SURE THE VICTIM IS SAFE OUTWEGHS ANY COURTESIES FOR THE CRIMINALS.


SPARE US THE SILLIASS BULLSHIT, PLEASE....
Click to expand...

Dude, cop made the correct decision. All I am doing is exploring the alternatives.

STOP PROJECTING YOUR FAILURES ON ME.
 
AProudLefty said:
I don't need to watch the video over and over and over again. It is OBVIOUS the cop had 1/2 second to make a decision. So stop projecting your failures on me.

Now, do you think that shooting 4 times is excessive?
Click to expand...
She was still standing by the time all for shots had been fired.
 
TTQ64 said:
the racist fucki could have said drop the knif there were several kops there. if these racist fucks cant deesclate a 15 year old girl protecting herself with a butter knif they shouldnt be kops

HE WAS IN NO DANGER

HE DIDNT HAVE TO PUT 4 BULLETS IN HER
Click to expand...

Obviously you didn't watch any of the footage and instead wish to resort to full moron mode.

I'm willing to bet that she was told to drop the knife. It was not a butter knife. The cop barely arrives to the scene and the morbidly obese whale shouts "I'm going to fucking kill you, bitch!" and charges at pink clothing lady with her knife extended outward towards pink clothing lady. The whale was shot when she was about to stab pink clothing lady.

Yes, he did have to put four bullets into her. He had to make sure that he hit her and that he stopped her from stabbing the other girl. One bullet might not be enough.

You're just another libtard dumb fuck who wants to play "armchair policeman" without the slightest idea of how cops are trained or what cops experience or what it feels like to be in such a situation. Fuck you.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Realistically? Little or nothing.

Police, like anyone in the military, in security, or whatever is taught and trained shoot center mass (eg., into the chest). That ensures the best chance your rounds hit the target and nothing else. You are trained to "stop the action" and typically fire in 3 round cycles in training. That means you pump three rounds into the target's chest as fast and accurately as you can. Then you stop and observe for a couple of seconds and do it again if that didn't stop the action.
Click to expand...

I think you just defined the problem I have been pointing out for a very long time.

The POLICE ARE NOT THE MILITARY! THE MILITARY ARE TRAINED TO KILL ENEMIES OF THE STATE!

THE PROBLEM IS- EVERY POLICE ACADEMY IN OUR NATION PREFERABLY HIRES EX-MILITARY TRAINERS TO TRAIN THEIR RECRUITS!

Police officers are supposed to be peace officers that should be TRAINED TO SAVE LIVES rather than taking lives!

The public are not enemies of the state- SO THEY SHOULD NOT BE TREATED AS SUCH WHEN THE POLICE ARE DEALING WITH THE PUBLIC THEY ARE SUPPOSE TO SERVE.

POLICEMEN ARE NOT THE MILITARY! Policemen are not judges- They are not Juries- and they certainly are not executioners!

STOP TRAINING COPS TO KILL THE PUBLIC!

Have you ever heard of discretion? Have you ever heard of restraint?
 
AProudLefty said:
Backtracking from what? I never said that the cop was in the wrong. The failures are on you and your own.
Click to expand...

" What Are The Ways The Cop Could Have Prevented The Stabbing?"

THAT IS MOST CERTAINLY SAYING THE COP DID WRONG....

NOTHING YOU PROPOSED WOULD HAVE DONE THAT....= POINT.
 
AProudLefty said:
Backtracking from what? I never said that the cop was in the wrong. The failures are on you and your own.
Click to expand...

" What Are The Ways The Cop Could Have Prevented The Stabbing?"

THAT IS MOST CERTAINLY SAYING THE COP DID WRONG....

NOTHING YOU PROPOSED WOULD HAVE PREVENTED THE STABBING....= POINT.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top