What happens if Trump is convicted in hush-money trial?

[Jade Dragon]

Are you unaware how Christians are supposed to be Christ like?

PMP never acts like a Christian. His favorite thing to do is call people cu**s.

 

[NakedHunterBiden]

PMP never acts like a Christian. His favorite thing to do is call people cu**s.

guess he or she will burn in hell with trump.

 

[NakedHunterBiden]

Gats to the people who were correct in their prediction.

• Margot
• Walt
• NakedHunterBiden
• Crepitus

 

[Jade Dragon]

guess he or she will burn in hell with trump.

Definitely a he. For more Christian behavior check out this flounce.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/threads/cypress-you-mother-fucking-whore.210056/

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Gats to the people who were correct in their prediction.

• Margot
• Walt
• NakedHunterBiden
• Crepitus

May 30th is a day to remember. The bitching by Trump on television is certain to become more shrill.

 

[Walt]

Another one of my predictions was correct.

 

[Port Tack]

Found guilty of what?

34 felonies. Have you ever sat on a jury? I have and it is a humbling experience that you are convinced by the court to take it seriously. You don't get a unanaimous verdict inside of one day unless everyone agrees the evidence is overwhelming. I'm sure that jury was not all democrats out to hang Trump regardless of what the Trump Nazi would like to think. Your hero was fucking guilty.

I never get called any more because when I say my daughter is the prosecuter in the next county I'm immediately excused.

 

[Port Tack]

So guilty of what?

All of them.

 

[Port Tack]

Unfortunately, aren't most, if not all, the same charges, just 34 different instances? Not a lawyer, but it appears it's an all or nothing thing. Maybe if some had better documentation that the others?

FWIW, I'm predicting a hung jury at best. I hope he's convicted, but not sure there's enough evidence to convict beyond a reasonable doubt.

The evidence was simply overwhelming. If you took the job as juror seriously you could not possibly have argued for an aquittal unless you were a die hard trumper. it was obvious Trump hid that payment as a business expense which was "fraud" and it was also obvious that he made that payment to further his chances of being elected. That's "tax and campaign violations" making the offense a felony, 34 times.

Are you saying that if you rob 5 banks you shoud only be charged for one count?

 

[Dutch Uncle]

The evidence was simply overwhelming. If you took the job as juror seriously you could not possibly have argued for an aquittal unless you were a die hard trumper. it was obvious Trump hid that payment as a business expense which was "fraud" and it was also obvious that he made that payment to further his chances of being elected. That's "tax and campaign violations" making the offense a felony, 34 times.

Are you saying that if you rob 5 banks you shoud only be charged for one count?

Agreed on juror. The problem, as often happens, is that the public doesn't see everything the jury sees.

No.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

All of them.

True. LOL

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Just the dummies and liars claim they don't know what the charges are.

I'm currently watching "Judgment at Nuremberg" to remind me what it's like to live under a racist authoritarian regime. I'm waiting to see all of those charged to start claiming the court is rigged, the judge isn't white and that it's a witch-hunt.

Judgment at Nuremberg | Stanley Kramer’s 1961 Film

Judgment at Nuremberg, American dramatic film, released in 1961, that was based on the post-World War II Nuremberg trials of former Nazi leaders. The film explores the complicity of the German people in the crimes committed by the state, including the atrocities of the Holocaust. (Read Martin

www.britannica.com

The film explores the complicity of the German people in the crimes committed by the state, including the atrocities of the Holocaust.

The Allies did, in some cases, get hoisted by their own petard. In the case of SS officer Otto Skorzeny, the Nazi equivalent of Wild Bill Donovan of the US OSS and Britian's "White Rabbit" Fredrick Yeo-Thomas, the latter was brought in as a witness for the defense who attested that all the things Skorzeny was accused of were things Allied spies and saboteurs did too. That ended the trial on the spot.

The Allies weren't about to try their own agents for the stuff Skorzeny did too...

 

[domer76]

As a jury deliberates on former President Donald Trump’s criminal hush money charges in New York, 2 in 3 registered U.S. voters say a guilty verdict would have no effect on whom they plan to vote for in the presidential election, according to a PBS NewsHour/NPR/Marist poll.

Overall, 67 percent of voters said a conviction would make no difference for them in November, including 74 percent of independents. That’s a significantly higher number than the percentage of either Republicans or Democrats who said it wouldn’t change their vote.

In fact, 25 percent of Republicans said they would be even more likely to vote for Trump if he were found guilty by a jury, while 27 percent of Democrats said they would be less likely to vote for him – a split that underscores hardened partisan perspectives on candidate Trump.

Guilty or not guilty, Trump verdict won’t sway most voters, poll shows

A quarter of Republicans said they would be even more likely to vote for Trump if he were found guilty by a jury, while 27 percent of Democrats said they would be less likely to vote for him – a split that underscores hardened partisan perspectives on candidate Trump, according to the latest PBS...

www.pbs.org

That means that it WOULD make a difference to 33%. That’s a significant number.

Think about what that 67% means. It means those people were going to vote FOR Trump or AGAINST Trump, regardless. It goes both ways. My vote, your vote and the vote of maybe 40-45% of the country wasn’t going to change. Not Trump. So, that 67% isn’t as dismaying as it seems.

 

[Port Tack]

May 30th is a day to remember. The bitching by Trump on television is certain to become more shrill.

View attachment 26614View attachment 26615

Yes and he will start to turn many who may have voted for him away. He will come out saying stupid shit like using the military to deport millions of people living and working in this country. Who knows what the asshole will say next. He seems to want to do nothing but make his Nazi's more fervent than ever while disregarding everyone else. They only get one vote each and he has turned so many off that he doesn't stand a chance. The republican convention will be a real gas, nominating their convicted felon to run when the shithead can't even travel to Canada or Mexico because his criminal record prevents him from going there.

 

[Port Tack]

That means that it WOULD make a difference to 33%. That’s a significant number.

Think about what that 67% means. It means those people were going to vote FOR Trump or AGAINST Trump, regardless. It goes both ways. My vote, your vote and the vote of maybe 40-45% of the country wasn’t going to change. Not Trump. So, that 67% isn’t as dismaying as it seems.

If only half of that 33% decided to not vote for Trump we would have the biggest landslide in history. Presidential elections are now determined by a few percent, if 5% of republicans don't vote for him he will lose.

 

[Damocles]

What happens? Apparently it begins a full on movement that will be tougher to beat than Trump would normally be to beat.

 

[NakedHunterBiden]

What happens? Apparently it begins a full on movement that will be tougher to beat than Trump would normally be to beat.

Not according to the most recent polling, but we will see.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

What happens? Apparently it begins a full on movement that will be tougher to beat than Trump would normally be to beat.

Not according to the most recent polling, but we will see.

Agreed. We, the People, still need to see the debate, the conventions and what the candidates do in between now and prior to voting....which will come early for those voting by mail but the results won't be known until Guy Fawkes Day.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Well, we now know...

Trump raises huge new globs of cash to run for President
His polling numbers improve.

Biden tanks in the polls...

 

[T. A. Gardner]

If only half of that 33% decided to not vote for Trump we would have the biggest landslide in history. Presidential elections are now determined by a few percent, if 5% of republicans don't vote for him he will lose.

The problem is for Democrats, that they are giving Republicans and independents a solid reason to vote, and NOT vote Democrat. Voters who are motivated are more likely to vote. On the flip side, only the Left for the Democrats is truly motivated to vote this time. Most Democrats are ambivalent about voting for a corrupt, doddering, fool who has tanked the economy and adopted foreign policies they disagree with.