what is too much and why don't the people that count speak up?

All that says is that costs are going up faster than wages. How does this apply to the rich robbing the poor? This would mean that the costs of doing business would also increase.

You didn't answer my question. Did you look down upon your employers the way you do other people's employers?

Immie

it most CERTAINLY did answer your question....in many ways it showed how the wealthiest are TAKING MORE from those that make less...making them work harder, and produce more for the company without sharing in the spoils of the worker's hard labor....greed....at the top...

the wealthiest, taking from the lower worker.
 
It's not that Immy favors the rich...

He's just playing on their side because they're the ones being unfairly attacked.

I'm sure if a bunch of turbo-cons came in here and argued that the poor were sucking off the rich and deserved to die he'd do the same thing for the poor. It's simply that he's unbiased.
 
It's not that Immy favors the rich...

He's just playing on their side because they're the ones being unfairly attacked.

I'm sure if a bunch of turbo-cons came in here and argued that the poor were sucking off the rich and deserved to die he'd do the same thing for the poor. It's simply that he's unbiased.

that would be how HE SHOULD handle it watermark, but that is not how he WOULD handle it....

because this opportunity to defend those that have less when someone is screwing them has arisen before this one and even then, he has chosen to show his favoritism towards the rich....they mesmerize him! :D

care
 
Care4, your are a shining example of an unamerican socialist. Your rants paint wealthy people as bad and poor as good just because.
Facts are 80% of the wealthy are first genaration and are just like you except they "SAVE THEIR ASSES OFF" instead of sucking the gov tit. And most of the poor choise to avoid "FREE EDUCATION".
You would be much more happy in FRANCE
 
All that says is that costs are going up faster than wages. How does this apply to the rich robbing the poor? This would mean that the costs of doing business would also increase.

You didn't answer my question. Did you look down upon your employers the way you do other people's employers?

Immie

I was very proud of the company I worked for...they did their employees good, most all of the time...with pay and so many benefits that you couldn't even count them on two hands....it won HUMAN RESOURCES best company of the year in ALL of the usa, for its size company, two of the years that I worked for them....

I had no reason to look down upon them....I wish every company out there could treat their employees with the same care and respect and compassion.

hope that answers your question!
 
that would be how HE SHOULD handle it watermark, but that is not how he WOULD handle it....

because this opportunity to defend those that have less when someone is screwing them has arisen before this one and even then, he has chosen to show his favoritism towards the rich....they mesmerize him! :D

care


You are so full of shit, not only are your eyes brown but your grey hair has turned brown too.

I don't give a damned about the rich. I simply despise the authoritarianism of the socialist. I don't want to be forced to give. I will chose to give when I can. You want to steal from me (and I am definitely not rich) to give to other people who cheat the system, many of whom have a hell of a lot more than I do.

Let me repeat Tops statement which bears repeating:

"Care4, your are a shining example of an unamerican socialist."

Immie
 
You are so full of shit, not only are your eyes brown but your grey hair has turned brown too.

I don't give a damned about the rich. I simply despise the authoritarianism of the socialist. I don't want to be forced to give. I will chose to give when I can. You want to steal from me (and I am definitely not rich) to give to other people who cheat the system, many of whom have a hell of a lot more than I do.

Let me repeat Tops statement which bears repeating:

"Care4, your are a shining example of an unamerican socialist."

Immie

What EXACTLY is it that you are professing that I am MAKING you give?

I have no idea what you are even talking about? It seems as though you are trying to change this conversation in to something your passionate over or something? But whatever it is, I am not buying in to it...

btw, I was only teasing you on the mesmerizing thingy...:eek: I thought I would get your attention with it! :D
 
What EXACTLY is it that you are professing that I am MAKING you give?

I have no idea what you are even talking about? It seems as though you are trying to change this conversation in to something your passionate over or something? But whatever it is, I am not buying in to it...

btw, I was only teasing you on the mesmerizing thingy...:eek: I thought I would get your attention with it! :D

You got my attention alright.

Look, Socialist such as yourself, think that the government should get all income, take out their share (the majority of it) and then give back whatever is left (a very small portion of it), to the people equally. In other words, they want to redistribute income so that everyone is equal regardless of the work performed.

That is ridiculous and definitely unamerican.

Immie
 
Its really funny how the turbo-libs and socialist think that it's the rich's faul that the poor shun education/skills training/ and investment.
Care4 is commically funny with the rich screwing the poor routine. She could win last comic standing. So could Desh
 
You are so full of shit, not only are your eyes brown but your grey hair has turned brown too.

I don't give a damned about the rich. I simply despise the authoritarianism of the socialist. I don't want to be forced to give. I will chose to give when I can. You want to steal from me (and I am definitely not rich) to give to other people who cheat the system, many of whom have a hell of a lot more than I do.

Let me repeat Tops statement which bears repeating:

"Care4, your are a shining example of an unamerican socialist."

Immie

As oposed to the authoritarianism of the cons ?
 
Its really funny how the turbo-libs and socialist think that it's the rich's faul that the poor shun education/skills training/ and investment.
Care4 is commically funny with the rich screwing the poor routine. She could win last comic standing. So could Desh

I could not afford college, my dad died when I was 16. Had to help support the family. Then I got drafted, then I was stupid and got married. To invest you have to have something left after basic living expenses.
 
As oposed to the authoritarianism of the cons ?

Well, not that of the Neo-cons or the Religious Right.

Why not something middle of the road like Capitalism?

Capitalists can be either left or right. Plenty of left wing capitalists out there. Despite what Care4all preaches constantly, there is nothing wrong with making money. She even seems to revere it when it is her or her company ripping poor people off, ($80 sneakers ring a bell?) but when it is others well, they have no rights to make money.

Immie
 
I have to agree Immie, plenty or right wing socialsits out there too. I wonder why, could it have something to do with democracy and what the people want or is it something else ?
 
"I have to agree Immie, plenty or right wing socialsits out there too."


social sits? Is that a social baby-sitter?

Immie
 
I have to agree Immie, plenty or right wing socialsits out there too. I wonder why, could it have something to do with democracy and what the people want or is it something else ?

I doubt there are that many out there.

Most Americans believe in the freedom to make money and to keep what you make. Most Americans dislike the IRS and the amount of money that is confiscated from them every year. Confiscated then wasted, I might add. Most Americans are giving and willing to give to the needy but do not want to be forced to do so. At least, that is the America that I thought I lived in.

Maybe Care's philosophy has taken over and we are one step from NAZI Germany and I didn't realize it?

Immie
 
You got my attention alright.

Look, Socialist such as yourself, think that the government should get all income, take out their share (the majority of it) and then give back whatever is left (a very small portion of it), to the people equally. In other words, they want to redistribute income so that everyone is equal regardless of the work performed.

That is ridiculous and definitely unamerican.

Immie

okkkk?

so you and topspin have decided to go on this rant about socialism FOR SOME STRANGE REASON, and have decided to be this drama queen about some ridiculous subject that has nothing to do with this thread?

and it CERTAINLY does not represent any of the views i have ever expressed in my life so.....

i guess i'll just write you off to lunacy?

care
 
Back
Top