When the Constitution was trashed and how we may never recover.

Hoosier Daddy said:
did you know they said all that shit 230 fucking years ago, when most of them had slaves,
Click to expand...
Most people did not have slaves. Slaves were expensive, both to buy and house.
Hoosier Daddy said:
when women could not vote, and the most dangerous gun was a fucking musket?
Click to expand...
Go stand in front of a musket while someone fires it at you. Tell how 'undangerous' this weapon is.
You could own your own cannon, your own explosives, your own primitive machine gun (that was around at the time). You could own a sword, or any other weapon you can name. You still can today. Unconstitutional laws to not have to be recognized.
Hoosier Daddy said:
and very few cops,
Click to expand...
There are a lot fewer cops today, thanks to BLM violence and Democrats. There are very few cops out in the country.
Hoosier Daddy said:
and very few butcher stores,
Click to expand...
People in the country butcher their own meat. They will also butcher meat and sell it to the 'butcher' stores.
Hoosier Daddy said:
and guns were necessary for most colonists? not like today? get it?
Click to expand...
Appeal to history fallacy. Special pleading fallacy.

You do not get to decide what weapon people get to use for self defense.
 
Truth Detector said:
That has got to be the dumbest argument I've ever seen on the Constitution. I think we're done here. I can't argue with an uneducated moron who makes laughably stupid arguments like this. :palm:
Click to expand...

In other words, you have no clue where the Constitution gives the government the power to control immigration. Just cite the provision.

 
BidenPresident said:
The part about a well regulated militia is completely irrelevant. They put it in there for no reason.
Click to expand...

They put it in their for a very specific reason.

States ALSO have the right to defend themselves (just as any government does). They organize militias for that purpose.

If someone were to attack Washington State, for example, it has the right to organize a militia to repel the invasion. It does not have to wait for the federal government.

The federal government also has a militia, called the National Guard. It has the right to organize that militia, just as the States do.

The Washington Militia Guard currently has about 75 people in it, mostly administrative staff since it's not on active status.

A government has the right of self defense just as an individual does.
 
Into the Night said:
Most people did not have slaves. Slaves were expensive, both to buy and house. (so that makes slavery acceptable? what a freaking asshole you are)


You do not get to decide what weapon people get to use for self defense.
Click to expand...

we, the people do, by our votes and backed up by supreme court decisions. like banning assault weapons, fully auto machine guns, hand grenades, bazookas, shoulder fired ground to air missile systems, fully operational tanks, nuclear submarines and the like, stupid fuck clown.
 
AProudLefty said:
Sure it does. I was wrong about the last word.

No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Click to expand...

What does that have to do with stop signs? This is not a grant of power but a limit on state power.
 
Into the Night said:
They put it in their for a very specific reason.

States ALSO have the right to defend themselves (just as any government does). They organize militias for that purpose.

If someone were to attack Washington State, for example, it has the right to organize a militia to repel the invasion. It does not have to wait for the federal government.

The federal government also has a militia, called the National Guard. It has the right to organize that militia, just as the States do.

The Washington Militia Guard currently has about 75 people in it, mostly administrative staff since it's not on active status.

A government has the right of self defense just as an individual does.
Click to expand...

true...that is what the 2nd Amendment guarantees. duh. not individuals NOT in a well regulated militia.
 
Hoosier Daddy said:
you are the clueless bitch, boy. all the punk ass gun nuts today with 3 assault weapons each would be killed within hours if push came to shove and our military went rogue. are you really this fucking senseless?
Click to expand...

There is no such thing as an 'assault weapon'.

The military would stand no chance against a united citizenry.
 
Flash said:
What does that have to do with stop signs? This is not a grant of power but a limit on state power.
Click to expand...

I guess my point is that it has to do with life. Without the stop signs, lives will be deprived.

I guess I was having a brain fart moment. LOL.

However, we do have the right to life and to be protected from others who are indifferent to it.
 
Into the Night said:
There is no such thing as an 'assault weapon'.

The military would stand no chance against a united citizenry.
Click to expand...

7eyjcOI.gif
 
Into the Night said:
There is no such thing as an 'assault weapon'.

The military would stand no chance against a united citizenry.
Click to expand...

yes, there is such a thing as an assault weapon, stupid fuck. and i cannot believe how fucking stupid you are. if the military went full on neanderthal, did not care about collateral damage, any uprising, any armed revolt, would be squashed like a bug on a windshield of a car doing 100 mph...are you nuts?
 
Hoosier Daddy said:
yes, there is such a thing as an assault weapon, stupid fuck. and i cannot believe how fucking stupid you are. if the military went full on neanderthal, did not care about collateral damage, any uprising, any armed revolt, would be squashed like a bug on a windshield of a car doing 100 mph...are you nuts?
Click to expand...

He is nuts.
 
Truth Detector said:
Your views are very idealistic and unrealistic.

I was amused by looking up the Canadian Constitution by the way; 85 pages??? :laugh:
Click to expand...

Canada has no constitution. It is a federated oligarchy.

The so-called 'Canadian Constitution' isn't a constitution at all. It can be changed or quashed at will by Parliament.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top