AProudLefty
He cries for attention. :)
Dipshit probably doesn't know that a vast majority of the anti-abortion crowd are women of both parties.
Another whooping lie.
Dipshit probably doesn't know that a vast majority of the anti-abortion crowd are women of both parties.
Oh eat a dick! RETARD!
Learn how to handle adversity!
Learn how to handle the truth and reality! GROW A PAIR!
You look like a spoiled brat whiny snot-nosed loser- LIKE TRUMP!
In the establishment clause. Try reading the Constitution and court cases establishing its meaning.
You seem to lack even the most basic knowledge.
Now I’m really confused.These days, if a Conservative wants to wipe his ass after a shit, he has to check with the Trump people about what brand to use...or see if using their fingers is what Trump wants for today.
The liberals choose their brand of toilet paper for themselves.
And all liberals and conservatives don't agree with the positions in the OP. We all assume we are talking about general beliefs and not 100% agreement by either side. Trump said when he was elected Americans would be able to say "Merry Christmas again."
That implied we could not say that now or that we could not discuss religion in public--another way to attract support by making voters believe those things are not allowed.
Quite the compelling argument. Did you learn that technique in first grade?
half-wit
noun
\ ˈhaf-ˌwit , ˈhäf- \
: a foolish or stupid person
I've handled adversity all my life dimwitted wonder twat. How would you know. You're a repugnant, triggered whiny little know-nothing.
I am amused that you think you know what the truth is being such a sociopathic lying dumbass.
Projection
Projection is the process of displacing one’s feelings onto a different person, animal, or object. The term is most commonly used to describe defensive projection—attributing one’s own unacceptable urges to another. For example, if someone continuously bullies and ridicules a peer about his insecurities, the bully might be projecting his own struggle with self-esteem onto the other person.
According to Madison who wrote the 1st Amendment and Supreme Court cases “The establishment of religion clause means at least this: Neither a state nor the federal government may set up a church. Neither can pass laws that aid one religion, aid all religions, or prefer one religion over another. Neither can force a person to go to or to remain away from church against his will or force him to profess a belief or disbelief in any religion… . Neither a state or the federal government may, openly or secretly, participate in the affairs of any religious organizations or groups and vice versa. In the words of Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect ‘a wall of separation between church and state."
Requiring a person to recite a prayer written by a government body violates this entire principle. It violates the establishment clause. I should not have to be teaching you these simple facts you should have learned in high school.
Some of our early presidents did not even believe in having chaplains in the armed forces. A law must have a secular purpose to be constitutional. There is nothing secular about requiring a mandated prayer in school.
How does a prayer set up a church, aid one religion, aid all religions, or prefer one religion over another? It doesn't. No one is forced to say the prayer either. So there goes that insipid claim.
Does it hurt you if it ends?
Does it hurt you if it ends?
Another whooping lie.
Now I’m really confused.
It hurts society when we abandon our morality and beliefs and the family unit. So yes, it is insipid and stupid to claim that we should ban religious faith from all facets of Government and our lives.
Perhaps those who hate Christians, hate prayer, don't care about the family unit and want Government dependency should move to a Muslim country or China? Perhaps Cuba. After all, we see how well it works there right?
How does a prayer set up a church, aid one religion, aid all religions, or prefer one religion over another? It doesn't. No one is forced to say the prayer either. So there goes that insipid claim.
You want teachers to continue leading their classrooms in Christian prayers in public schools? Why?
Most of all- just learn when and how to SHUT THE FUCK UP!
LOL! WHAT A FUCKING DESPERATE LITTLE WHINY-ASSED SNOT NOSE LOSER!
Because things were better when they did.
How does stopping a state-sponsored prayer hurt you?
Being forced to say the prayer is not an issue. The issue is whether government can mandate a school to say a prayer.
The Lemon Test requires a secular purpose for any government activity. What is the secular purpose for requiring a prayer. What right does the government have to dictate religious practices.
The only provision pertaining to religion in the original Constitution said there should be no religious test for holding any office--that makes it clear the founders wanted government and religion to remain separate.