As you know, the EEOC applies to workplace relationships.
OK, so...IF that phrase
-that you said is conveyed by the Confederate Flag- is intimidating in a workplace, or in a public place, why wouldn't it be intimidating anywhere else?
It also says nothing about flags,
It says nothing about symbols either, but you can sure as shit bet that a swastika would be considered a form of intimidation in the workplace.
. It also says nothing about flags, so trying to claim a flag means "go back to" is a huge stretch
YOU ARE THE ONE WHO SAID THAT'S WHAT THE FLAG MEANS, FLASH!
You are a big phony for claiming the EEOC makes something intimidation when you know it is only applies to fellow employees.
So if it counts as intimidation in the workplace, and in public places, why wouldn't it count anywhere else?
And those flags and monuments are in public places, BTW.
The more we argue the more you go off the deep end to find some support.
So you again patronize and dismiss because of how inconvenient it is for your argument. You latch onto the weak defense of
"well, they didn't explicit say FLAGS did they?" Well, no, but they didn't explicitly say swastikas either, but you can pretty much assume that would constitute intimidation and harassment.
And you said yourself that flag conveys the "Go back to Africa" message. You said it at least twice.
My question is, why is it intimidation in the workplace and in public, but not elsewhere?
Can people only be intimidated in public or in the workplace?
Just state your opinon--you don't like Confederate symbols outside of museums because you think they are intimidating to blacks.
I don't think they're intimidating to black people,
I KNOW THEY ARE BECAUSE I TALK TO BLACK PEOPLE.
You even have a black person on this very thread literally saying that, and you ignore and dismiss it.
You're a narcissist.
You know it is not legal intimidation
But it is intimidation, as you said yourself when you said the message conveyed is "go back to where you came from", which the EEOC says is intimidation in a workplace
and in public.
Don't try to justify your opinions based on convoluted and totally inaccurate legal reasoning.
Ironic because that's exactly what you're doing to dismiss the inherent cognitive dissonance in what you've been saying here all afternoon.