Who's lying

[christiefan915]

Well, it looks as though you're going to have to spell it out, Damo.

The posts did change yesterday. I saw it and i'm not in any "camp". Draw your own conclusions (or more likely just go with your own prejudices for old time's sake).

That post just landed you smack in the middle of the Kennel Klub Kabal.

 

[christiefan915]

do you know what the term means? it means he plead neither guilty nor not guilty. pretty simple stuff.

Of course I know what it means. You're obfuscating. It also means this: "A no-contest plea, while not technically a guilty plea, has the same immediate effect as a guilty plea, and is often offered as a part of a plea bargain."

 

[Cancel 2016.11]

Words cannot express how touched I am. Here I have been caught red-handed lying about Damo (according to USF), and Damo wants USF to drop it because he is pleading no contest, and now Free, out of what can only be concern at embarrassing me, wants to close the very thread I'm caught in so that it goes away!

My my my. What an abundance of concerned gentlemen.

However, I will pass.

Leave the thread open. Let's see who can stand to be exposed and who cannot.

 

[Phantasmal]

this perfectly describes the quartet.

Well, back on ignore for you. Boy, are you gonna feel stupid when we ind out what happened...

 

[cancel2 2022]

Of course I know what it means. You're obfuscating. It also means this: "A no-contest plea, while not technically a guilty plea, has the same immediate effect as a guilty plea, and is often offered as a part of a plea bargain."

Damo said much the same thing when he was caught red handed before, Yurt is just chiming in as he usually does.

 

[christiefan915]

Damo said much the same thing when he was caught red handed before, Yurt is just chiming in as he usually does.

Yes, his knee starts jerking when he reads our posts.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

what did i say that was knee jerk?

everything i've stated is 100% true. idiot liberals.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

Of course I know what it means. You're obfuscating. It also means this: "A no-contest plea, while not technically a guilty plea, has the same immediate effect as a guilty plea, and is often offered as a part of a plea bargain."

how i am obfuscating? i said the absolute truth. you're just pissed off because i'm right.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

Well, back on ignore for you. Boy, are you gonna feel stupid when we ind out what happened...

i could care less, most of your posts are worthless. you're just here to spin and gossip.

what he said perfectly describes you four. it has NOTHING to do with this thread, hence, why i underlined only that portion. you should get off the hate wagon more often.

 

[christiefan915]

i could care less, most of your posts are worthless. you're just here to spin and gossip.

what he said perfectly describes you four. it has NOTHING to do with this thread, hence, why i underlined only that portion. you should get off the hate wagon more often.

You could care less, but you don't. That's why you're responding.

The sole purpose of this thread is to flame-bait. If your whiny little tush was the topic, we'd never hear the end of it. Instead, you're defending it because liberals are the topic. And please don't split that hair that about "where am I defending it, liar?" because your responses gave it away.

 

[christiefan915]

how i am obfuscating? i said the absolute truth. you're just pissed off because i'm right.

I never said you were wrong, note the word "also" in my third sentence. You omitted part of the definition because it didn't suit your purpose to post it. A no-contest plea...has the same immediate effect as a guilty plea..." Yes or no?

 

[christiefan915]

what did i say that was knee jerk?

everything i've stated is 100% true. idiot liberals.

Did you see the post we're arguing about, yes or no?

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

Did you see the post we're arguing about, yes or no?

yes. that is obvious to anyone reading this thread.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

I never said you were wrong, note the word "also" in my third sentence. You omitted part of the definition because it didn't suit your purpose to post it. A no-contest plea...has the same immediate effect as a guilty plea..." Yes or no?

i did not omit anything. nice try. and what i said is 100% true. he neither plead innocent or guilty.

get a grip.

 

[christiefan915]

i did not omit anything. nice try. and what i said is 100% true. he neither plead innocent or guilty.

get a grip.

From the nolo contendere website:

Nolo contendere allows a defendant in a criminal action to accept the court’s punishment for a crime without having to admit guilt. Why is this better than pleading guilty? One crime or criminal action is often tied to another, and a defendant may not want to admit guilt to one crime that might be linked to other actions pending against him or her. Pleading no contest allows the defendant to move ahead in court proceedings without having an admission of guilt on the court records to be used as evidence in another trial. Nolo contendere essentially means that the defendant does not admit nor deny the charges, but will accept the penalties for the crime without protest.

http://www.nolocontendere.org/

 

[christiefan915]

yes. that is obvious to anyone reading this thread.

Yet you made no comment to that effect. All you did was join in the flame-baiting.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

You could care less, but you don't. That's why you're responding.

The sole purpose of this thread is to flame-bait. If your whiny little tush was the topic, we'd never hear the end of it. Instead, you're defending it because liberals are the topic. And please don't split that hair that about "where am I defending it, liar?" because your responses gave it away.

where have i defended the thread the topic? there is no hair to split, as i have never defended the OP.

if you don't like tough questions or facts and truth, pound sand you fucking whiner.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

Yet you made no comment to that effect. All you did was join in the flame-baiting.

yeah...agreeing you four are lying hacks....tough luck. it is true. don't like it change.

and look at your own posts...you're doing nothing but bitching.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

From the nolo contendere website:

Nolo contendere allows a defendant in a criminal action to accept the court’s punishment for a crime without having to admit guilt. Why is this better than pleading guilty? One crime or criminal action is often tied to another, and a defendant may not want to admit guilt to one crime that might be linked to other actions pending against him or her. Pleading no contest allows the defendant to move ahead in court proceedings without having an admission of guilt on the court records to be used as evidence in another trial. Nolo contendere essentially means that the defendant does not admit nor deny the charges, but will accept the penalties for the crime without protest.

http://www.nolocontendere.org/

AGAIN - what did i omit?

do you even know what the word "essentially" means? my statement was 100% true. talk about splitting hairs, you're now bitching and whining about 'essentially'.

 

[christiefan915]

where have i defended the thread the topic? there is no hair to split, as i have never defended the OP.

if you don't like tough questions or facts and truth, pound sand you fucking whiner.

I repeat. You posted on this thread just to stir shit, no mistake about it.

One has only to look at everything in the War Zone where you're the topic, to see how you react to this kind of thread. Talk about whining.