USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
My feat was that amazing to you?
That wasn't what I said, but it's obvious you're having a hissy; so I guess you'll read into someting, what ever is conveniant for you.
My feat was that amazing to you?
What's more phenomenal is that it was the same gal, and she had to ask me to stop at only seven...
What brought on the SM vs. USF spat?
For the record, all I managed to get out of college girls was head. Oh, well...
Too bad. "All in" more times than I could count. Seven times in one day!
Parsing words is the game to play when driving Winterborn batty.
You did, in fact, say that. Now, you can say it was a mistake and retract it.
But when someone asks "So you are saying that fucking 7 girls in one day is moral?" and you answer "That would certainly be", you are saying that it is moral.
Right. Parsing words.
You instead said, "That would certainly be." in answer to the question of, "Would f*cking 7 women in one day be moral?"
I would say that's a "record" of some sorts.
So are you or are you not Solitary? I have always seen you evade this question and yet you insist on an answer to this?
If you weren't so hissy you wouldn't have read something that wasn't there.Gee, that wasn't what you suggested.
Since Threedee said "collage girls", that would be plural.
Your reply of seven, suggested more then 1 "girl".
This makes your entire collection of comments, on this subject, misleading and ergo a lie.
You fail, again.
Oh I see. Now you have a new excuse for when you get caught either not reading or scewing up.
lol
Sorry, messing with you is entertaining, but you have never driven me batty.
Dance southernman, dance.
I would say that's a "record" of some sorts.
So are you or are you not Solitary? I have always seen you evade this question and yet you insist on an answer to this?
Right, that's why you lost your job, asked Damo to delete your posts, then came back three weeks later with a new name.
The evidence, Solitary, is that you now have a different job. Your old posts were not deleted; they exist to embarrass you as being written by Cancel3.
Too many coincidences to say otherwise, sorry.Evidence? You are just spouting pure fantasy and speculation.
And still avoiding the topic.
Too many coincidences to say otherwise, sorry.
DNA evidence uses the same logic, sorry.So you base your entire argument on coincidences?.....
DNA evidence uses the same logic, sorry.
There's lots of other coincidences as well. Figure out the % chance of each, and multiply them all. That's how DNA evidence is presented, Solitary.
Solitary would say the same thing.And it is coincidental that you do this whenever you are losing an argument and wish to avoid the topic.