Yet you fail to understand simple English. Madison anticipated that. lol
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Why Do You Believe What You Believe?
- Thread starter Lightbringer
- Start date
Yet you fail to understand simple English. Madison anticipated that. lol
Yet you fail to understand simple English. Madison anticipated that. lol
You've lost this one, dimwit. SCOTUS has settled in multiple rulings that are consistent and validates Congress's authority to tax and appropriate in the interest of the General Welfare. It's done. Closed. Quote Madison all you want, idiot. He can't return from the dead to change things.
Move on, punk. You've failed to make a case. As always.
You've lost this one, dimwit. SCOTUS has settled in multiple rulings that are consistent and validates Congress's authority to tax and appropriate in the interest of the General Welfare. It's done. Closed. Quote Madison all you want, idiot. He can't return from the dead to change things.
Move on, punk. You've failed to make a case. As always.
You seem to be admitting here that SCOTUS has usurped the Constitution. Well, it's a start. lol
You seem to be admitting here that SCOTUS has usurped the Constitution. Well, it's a start. lol
Nope. Sure didn't, cretin. Once again, your reading comprehension fails you. Here's reality, idiot
Butler
Helvering
Dole
Go cry a river, loser.
Nope. Sure didn't, cretin. Once again, your reading comprehension fails you. Here's reality, idiot
Butler
Helvering
Dole
Go cry a river, loser.
Yet here you wrote: "Quote Madison all you want, idiot. He can't return from the dead to change things." This indicates that you believe SCOTUS usurped Madison's clear language in the Constitution. Oops.
Yet here you wrote: "Quote Madison all you want, idiot. He can't return from the dead to change things." This indicates that you believe SCOTUS usurped Madison's clear language in the Constitution. Oops.
Wrong again, idiot. Remedial reading is recommended to for you, moron.
Why do you insist on going higher on the ladder of stupidity? It's not a badge of honor.
Wrong again, idiot. Remedial reading is recommended to for you, moron.
Why do you insist on going higher on the ladder of stupidity? It's not a badge of honor.
You're trying to walk it back, but not being successful. lol
You're trying to walk it back, but not being successful. lol
Wrong again, cretin. My stance has been clear and consistent. That you fail to understand that is on your shoulders, not mine.
Once again, you demonstrate your massively poor comprehension skills. Are you dyslexic or have some other learning disability? Get evaluated. There are treatments.
Wrong again, cretin. My stance has been clear and consistent. That you fail to understand that is on your shoulders, not mine.
Once again, you demonstrate your massively poor comprehension skills. Are you dyslexic or have some other learning disability? Get evaluated. There are treatments.
Madison wanted limited FedCo, yes or no? lol
Madison wanted limited FedCo, yes or no? lol
He sure did. And his opinion on the use of the General Welfare Clause has lost out in favor of Hamilton's.
How many times do we need to cover this, dunce?
And Madison was a major writer of the Constitution, yes or no? lolHe sure did. And his opinion on the use of the General Welfare Clause has lost out in favor of Hamilton's.
How many times do we need to cover this, dunce?
And Madison was a major writer of the Constitution, yes or no? lol
(laughing)
It's damn easy to what you're attempting here, moron, but your feeble attempt at logic fails miserably. It's not "Madison's way or the highway."
The Constitution is set up, by Madison if you want to go that route, with a triad of checks and balances. The three cases I referenced passed muster of all three legs of the Constitution, Madison's Constitution since you like that so much, to become law.
They had to be passed by both houses, signed by the President and then, when challenged, ruled on by SCOTUS. Guess what, clod, Madison's take on the General Welfare Clause lost on all three counts. Ain't that a fucking bummer? Especially for you. Madison is dead.
Dismissed again.
(laughing)
It's damn easy to what you're attempting here, moron, but your feeble attempt at logic fails miserably. It's not "Madison's way or the highway."
The Constitution is set up, by Madison if you want to go that route, with a triad of checks and balances. The three cases I referenced passed muster of all three legs of the Constitution, Madison's Constitution since you like that so much, to become law.
They had to be passed by both houses, signed by the President and then, when challenged, ruled on by SCOTUS. Guess what, clod, Madison's take on the General Welfare Clause lost on all three counts. Ain't that a fucking bummer? Especially for you. Madison is dead.
Dismissed again.
And the signers of the Constitution agreed with Madison unanimously, yes or no?
SmarterthanYou
rebel
I think you're a fuckstick for thinking they wouldn't do that.
I would absolutely LOVE, LOVE, LOVE, to see ANYONE post anything remotely credible to that 'theory', because it would give us the perfect excuse to rebel...........again.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
Are you absolutely positive that the Founders sole intent was to limit federal power?
EVERY piece of commentary during that time period indicates it is so. EVERYONE had a very healthy fear of concentrated central government power
SmarterthanYou
rebel
You do realize Koresh was barbecued before 1997 right?
yes, but i still remained a liberal. just an anti big government liberal
SmarterthanYou
rebel
(laughing)
It's damn easy to what you're attempting here, moron, but your feeble attempt at logic fails miserably. It's not "Madison's way or the highway."
The Constitution is set up, by Madison if you want to go that route, with a triad of checks and balances. The three cases I referenced passed muster of all three legs of the Constitution, Madison's Constitution since you like that so much, to become law.
They had to be passed by both houses, signed by the President and then, when challenged, ruled on by SCOTUS. Guess what, clod, Madison's take on the General Welfare Clause lost on all three counts. Ain't that a fucking bummer? Especially for you. Madison is dead.
Dismissed again.
whats hilarious is watching you AVOID saying that the courts are always right, while being challenged in obviously wrong decisions, all in an attempt to show that you're right....which you're not.
And the signers of the Constitution agreed with Madison unanimously, yes or no?
You have failed, punk, in your miserably pathetic backdoor attempt.
General Welfare Clause is alive and well and validates on numerous occasions by all three branches of government. Madison, bless his heart, set up a damn good system, didn't he? And it works. Butler, Helvering, and Doke are perfect examples.
Checkmate
EVERY piece of commentary during that time period indicates it is so. EVERYONE had a very healthy fear of concentrated central government power
Wrong, big bug boy.
whats hilarious is watching you AVOID saying that the courts are always right, while being challenged in obviously wrong decisions, all in an attempt to show that you're right....which you're not.
What's hilarious is watching you fail to comprehend my posts and insert your own interpretation. Illiterate little shitweasel you are. Tried everything from Dred Scott to Gore.
Gotta admire your perseverance, albeit misplaced. It has become stubborn stupidity for you now. Anything but admirable.
Pathetic.