Why homosexuality should be banned

  • Thread starter Thread starter WinterBorn
  • Start date Start date
Southern Man said:
Queers (and I use that term for convenience always, without intent to degrade) make a choice and must deal with the consequences, my friend. They can gain all he pleasures and pitfalls of legal marriage by filling the proper paperwork with an attorney. All conservatives ask for is that you don't call it marriage, because it ain't.
Click to expand...

There is more evidence pointing towards homosexuality being something you are born with than something you choose. There are plenty of examples of people showing signs of being gay very early in their lives. Most insist that they have always been attracted to the same gender.

The fact that we cannot point to a gene as the culprit does not mean it is not something they are born with. Afterall, they have located the "straight gene" either.
 
Southern Man said:
don't. A minority wants to degrade society further. I therefore resist them.
Click to expand...

Pure bigoted bullshit. You are claiming to know what "Most queers" want?

That is simply how you WANT it to be. No facts involved here.
 
Southern Man said:
Add it to your marriage and report back to me. :good4u:
Click to expand...

Trying to be clever isn't your strong suit. Tell us what effect it would have on YOUR mnarriage? No vague references to history, but what it will actually do to your marriage.
 
CaptBillyTheKid said:
And the institution of marriage couldn't be refined to include two men or two women?
Click to expand...
Again, those relationships have never been included within the definition of traditional marriage.

On issues of taxes: Our system of taxation is screwed up; that's not justification to screw up marriage.

On issue of child adoptions: Queers shouldn't be allowed to adopt unless there are no qualified married coupes available. All children deserve a traditional family.
 
Southern Man said:
Each State has its own definition.

That brings up a good point. If enablers in Massachusetts want queers to marry, I don't have a problem with that. Just don't expect the rest of the States to recognize it. "Don't Tread on Me."
Click to expand...

But every other State has to recognize a marriage that is legal in another Stage.

Arizona doesn't recognize common law marriages, unless it's one from a State that recognizes such.

Ergo: if Mass. recognizes a homo-sewual marriage, then every other State has to honor it.

The marriage recognition is a "normal society tradition". :good4u:
 
WinterBorn said:
Trying to be clever isn't your strong suit. Tell us what effect it would have on YOUR mnarriage? No vague references to history, but what it will actually do to your marriage.
Click to expand...
I'm not the one willing to experiment with marriage; you are. Have fling with the man next door and let us know how it effects your marriage.

Zing! :cof1:
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
But every other State has to recognize a marriage that is legal in another Stage.

Arizona doesn't recognize common law marriages, unless it's one from a State that recognizes such.

Ergo: if Mass. recognizes a homo-sewual marriage, then every other State has to honor it.

The marriage recognition is a "normal society tradition". :good4u:
Click to expand...

You see why I use the word "queer"? LOL

Does Massachusetts have to recognize my State license to carry a concealed weapon? If not, then why should NC recognize MA queer marriages?
 
Southern Man said:
Again, those relationships have never been included within the definition of traditional marriage.

On issues of taxes: Our system of taxation is screwed up; that's not justification to screw up marriage.

On issue of child adoptions: Queers shouldn't be allowed to adopt unless there are no qualified married coupes available. All children deserve a traditional family.
Click to expand...

YOur egotism never ceases to astound me. You insist that your views be everyone else's views, despite the fact that so many of your views are based on bullshit, bigotry and superstitions.


The fact remains that taxation and adoption are two areas you cannot wave away with civil contracts.

The tax system does indeed need to be fixed. But until it does it is an example of the prejudices against gay couples.

As for the children, 2 gay parents is better than one single parent. So lets not allow single parents unless there are no gay couples to adopt the child.
 
Southern Man said:
Again, those relationships have never been included within the definition of traditional marriage.

On issues of taxes: Our system of taxation is screwed up; that's not justification to screw up marriage.

On issue of child adoptions: Queers shouldn't be allowed to adopt unless there are no qualified married coupes available. All children deserve a traditional family.
Click to expand...


For some reason, you keep using the same conclusions that the people that argued against inter-racial marriage used to use.
 
Southern Man said:
I'm not the one willing to experiment with marriage; you are. Have fling with the man next door and let us know how it effects your marriage.

Zing! :cof1:
Click to expand...

Nice avoidance of the question. I can see why you would, since you have no answer.

As for the "zing", you are dreaming.
 
Southern Man said:
Again, those relationships have never been included within the definition of traditional marriage.
Click to expand...
You yourself said traditions are refined and change with time, so your basis that is has 'never happened before' is flawed.

On issues of taxes: Our system of taxation is screwed up; that's not justification to screw up marriage.
Click to expand...
Agreed on the tax system but how would it 'screw up' marriage? Mine certainly wouldn't change.

On issue of child adoptions: Queers shouldn't be allowed to adopt unless there are no qualified married coupes available. All children deserve a traditional family.
Click to expand...
Again, your basis of tradition is flawed. How is two men or two women raising a child any different than a single parent or other 'non-traditonal' family unit?
 
Southern Man said:
You see why I use the word "queer"? LOL

Does Massachusetts have to recognize my State license to carry a concealed weapon? If not, then why should NC recognize MA queer marriages?
Click to expand...

Now you want to use my finger-lexia to support your reasoning!!
That's really gay. :good4u:

Two differnt issues; but eventually this will probably be the case, as more States become more enlightened. :cof1:
 
CaptBillyTheKid said:
...
Again, your basis of tradition is flawed. How is two men or two women raising a child any different than a single parent or other 'non-traditonal' family unit?
Click to expand...
Again, every child deserves a traditional family. A dad can give advice that a mom can't, and vice-versa. If society can see to that, we'd be better off.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top