Why homosexuality should be banned

[DamnYankee]

As a reminder, the definition of natural is: "occurring in conformity with the ordinary course of nature".

So is homosexuality natural? Of course not, since by itself, a species would become extinct in one generation.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

Let's keep the disgusting descriptions of queer sex out of this, along with the self- flagellation claims of winning an argument, shall we?

Again, are you going to argue that homosexuality is natural, or not?

lmao....you try to input morality (disgusting) into an argument about whether it is natural, which has no morality.....this has been your problem since the beginning.

i just made my statement regarding the naturalness of homosexuality and you're asking me to do so again? what part of my post did you not understand?

or do you think a blowjob is natural......no wonder you ran from that, because i know you think it is, but its not.....so you run

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

I hate to break it to you, SM, but oral sex is pretty common amoung straight folk.

 

[DamnYankee]

The act of males mounting other males within species, in nature, has only to do with domination, not mating. Therefore it is natural for them, animals, to behave this way.

Since it is done for domination, it is not done for a monogamous, homosexual relationship. The argument that this proves "natural", with respect to homosexuality, therefore falls flat.

 

[Canceled2]

uh.....and what is not natural if a human male would behave this way?

That's your argument? Homsexuals mount one another to show domination and this is natural to the human species?

 

[DamnYankee]

lmao....you try to input morality (disgusting) into an argument about whether it is natural, which has no morality.....this has been your problem since the beginning.

i just made my statement regarding the naturalness of homosexuality and you're asking me to do so again? what part of my post did you not understand?

or do you think a blowjob is natural......no wonder you ran from that, because i know you think it is, but its not.....so you run

You're the one who inputted disgusting descriptions of sodomy. I asked you to stop, and present your argument on why you think homosexuality is natural. This is my third and final attempt.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

That's your argument? Homsexuals mount one another to show domination and this is natural to the human species?

it is clear you do not understand the argument about whether homosexuality is natural or not....even SM defines nature as that which happens in nature, hence the term...

and yes, it happens among humans, to deny that, is simply ignorant...

that natural argument is a failure when arguing about homosexuality, let it go, use something else

 

[WinterBorn]

As a reminder, the definition of natural is: "occurring in conformity with the ordinary course of nature".

So is homosexuality natural? Of course not, since by itself, a species would become extinct in one generation.

You are trying to make the point that it is either heterosexuality or homosexuality exclusively within a species. But no one has tried to say that.

Numerous species form same sex pairings. Some for life and some for recreation. The fact that it occurs in other species, in their natural habitats, means it is perfectly natural for a portion of the population to be homosexual.

 

[DamnYankee]

it is clear you do not understand the argument about whether homosexuality is natural or not....even SM defines nature as that which happens in nature, hence the term...

Post 101 states otherwise.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

You're the one who inputted disgusting descriptions of sodomy. I asked you to stop, and present your argument on why you think homosexuality is natural. This is my third and final attempt.

fuck you, i described oral sex, dog licking balls in the most unsexual way and you're telling i was describing sodomy to you...

i've given you my reasons as to why it is natural, you've obviously ignored them.....and are now going to puss out and claim some third and final attempt.....

homosexuality is as natural as blowjobs, no morality, speaking solely of nature....both orifices are not meant to have a cock orgasm in....nor is the cock meant to go into the mouth, of either sex...tell me, dogs lick their balls, why don't you, its only "natural"

let's see if you have the balls to answer to this instead of insulting me and threatening me with you final attempt bullshit

 

[WinterBorn]

Since it is done for domination, it is not done for a monogamous, homosexual relationship. The argument that this proves "natural", with respect to homosexuality, therefore falls flat.

Go read this article: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/07/0722_040722_gayanimal_2.html

It pretty much shoots down your "its unnatural" argument.

I think National Geographic is a pretty safe source for this info.

 

[WinterBorn]

fuck you, i described oral sex, dog licking balls in the most unsexual way and you're telling i was describing sodomy to you...

i've given you my reasons as to why it is natural, you've obviously ignored them.....and are now going to puss out and claim some third and final attempt.....



let's see if you have the balls to answer to this instead of insulting me and threatening me with you final attempt bullshit

Technically sodomy is either oral or anal sex. I am sure SM attributes it to anal sex. I am certain he is not calling a blowjob disgusting.

 

[WinterBorn]

Post 101 states otherwise.

I provided a link that discusses this. It is certainly natural by the definition you gave.

 

[Canceled2]

it is clear you do not understand the argument about whether homosexuality is natural or not....even SM defines nature as that which happens in nature, hence the term...

and yes, it happens among humans, to deny that, is simply ignorant...

that natural argument is a failure when arguing about homosexuality, let it go, use something else

? The point is homosexuality is not natural in nature.

In 1996, homosexual scientist Simon LeVay admitted that the evidence pointed to isolated acts, not to homosexuality:

Although homosexual behavior is very common in the animal world, it seems to be very uncommon that individual animals have a long-lasting predisposition to engage in such behavior to the exclusion of heterosexual activities. Thus, a homosexual orientation, if one can speak of such thing in animals, seems to be a rarity.[11]
Despite the "homosexual" appearances of some animal behavior, this behavior does not stem from a "homosexual" instinct that is part of animal nature.

Dr. Antonio Pardo, Professor of Bioethics at the University of Navarre, Spain, explains:

Properly speaking, homosexuality does not exist among animals.... For reasons of survival, the reproductive instinct among animals is always directed towards an individual of the opposite sex. Therefore, an animal can never be homosexual as such. Nevertheless, the interaction of other instincts (particularly dominance) can result in behavior that appears to be homosexual. Such behavior cannot be equated with an animal homosexuality. All it means is that animal sexual behavior encompasses aspects beyond that of reproduction.[12]

 

[Canceled2]

Post 101 states otherwise.

Here's a link for some thought provoking reading. Everything does not have to be PC.

http://www.narth.com/menus/interviews.html

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

? The point is homosexuality is not natural in nature.

In 1996, homosexual scientist Simon LeVay admitted that the evidence pointed to isolated acts, not to homosexuality:

Although homosexual behavior is very common in the animal world, it seems to be very uncommon that individual animals have a long-lasting predisposition to engage in such behavior to the exclusion of heterosexual activities. Thus, a homosexual orientation, if one can speak of such thing in animals, seems to be a rarity.[11]
Despite the "homosexual" appearances of some animal behavior, this behavior does not stem from a "homosexual" instinct that is part of animal nature.

Dr. Antonio Pardo, Professor of Bioethics at the University of Navarre, Spain, explains:

Properly speaking, homosexuality does not exist among animals.... For reasons of survival, the reproductive instinct among animals is always directed towards an individual of the opposite sex. Therefore, an animal can never be homosexual as such. Nevertheless, the interaction of other instincts (particularly dominance) can result in behavior that appears to be homosexual. Such behavior cannot be equated with an animal homosexuality. All it means is that animal sexual behavior encompasses aspects beyond that of reproduction.[12]

you really want to go with this argument?

homosexuality is as normal as any other non penis/sex act in nature. the foundation of this argument is: the penis is solely about reproduction, the vagina is solely about reproduction.

is this what you're claiming.....

and

do you deny that hetro married couples engage in anal sex?

 

[WinterBorn]

Here's a link for some thought provoking reading. Everything does not have to be PC.

http://www.narth.com/menus/interviews.html

You provide a link to a periodical from a group that tries to "cure" homosexuality?

I think the evidence provided by National Geographic is much more politically neutral, and therefore more acceptable.

 

[Canceled2]

you really want to go with this argument?

homosexuality is as normal as any other non penis/sex act in nature. the foundation of this argument is: the penis is solely about reproduction, the vagina is solely about reproduction.

is this what you're claiming.....

and

do you deny that hetro married couples engage in anal sex?

It's not my argument, it's the argument that exists period. The scinece rests with the fact that observable in nature animals are not homosexual. Lower species get confused for various reasons higher species use mounting to show dominance...

As to humans engaging in kinky sex that only proves that some humans like kinky sex...bfd. None of this makes homosexuality natural.

 

[/MSG/]

Other species in unnatural situations or environments.

Speculative, as you have no knowledge of such events.

All scientific and empirical evidence suggest that is indeed a genetic trait and thus natural.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

UOTE=Ice Dancer;541562]It's not my argument,

you have made it your argument

it's the argument that exists period.

so it is only an argument....as i said...you've used it as your own......

The scinece rests with the fact that observable in nature animals are not homosexual.

absolutely untrue

Lower species get confused for various reasons higher species use mounting to show dominance...

let go your bias.....hetro rape.....homo rape....prison rape....thus proving it happens among humans.....how can you not see this?

As to humans engaging in kinky sex that only proves that some humans like kinky sex...bfd. None of this makes homosexuality natural.

you just lost your whole argument....you call it "kinky" among humans.....yet among animals you call it "dominance".......