Why homosexuality should be banned

  • Thread starter Thread starter WinterBorn
  • Start date Start date
Southern Man said:
Sure I did, by giving you a reason for my obvious answer. Let me be more direct this time:


People who can't reproduce, retards or those with cancer should be allowed to enter into traditional marriage. You're obviously trying to point out a hypocrisy but my reasoning below shows that there isn't one.
Click to expand...

So people who are sterile, for any number of reasons, should't be allowed to marry!!

Why??
 
Yurt said:
you have made it your argument
Click to expand...

It is THE argument I have taken an opposite side from yours...if you want to further have an argument over semantics you'll do it by youself.

so it is only an argument....as i said...you've used it as your own......
Click to expand...

No, it is an argument not only an argument...you like to use semantics alot eh?


absolutely untrue
Click to expand...

No, it is true.



let go your bias.....hetro rape.....homo rape....prison rape....thus proving it happens among humans.....how can you not see this
Click to expand...
?


You make no sense here.


you just lost your whole argument....you call it "kinky" among humans.....yet among animals you call it "dominance"...
Click to expand...

Animals do not practice penetration. Animals do not seek out same sex partners to have sex with. Animals practice dominance and some lower species become confused do to other stimuli, this is not homosexuality. This is obeservable scientific fact. Your example of heterosexual anal sex amongst human female/male couples is merely kinky sex...period. It proves nothing about homosexuality being natural.
 
Is this what the opponents of gay marriage are hanging their hats on these days? Claiming that its unnatural??

LOL @ you then. If that's a requirement for opposing gay marriage, then you reduce your co-thinkers to equally uneducated, uninformed, willfully blindfolded and ideological people who consider science and observation secondary to your A.) Fear of homos. B.)Fear of being a homo, or C.) Just not liking homos.

Claiming its unnatural is your "tell" in case you didn't know. Because, uh, it is natural you moron.

So lets take your side and say down is up, right is left, and everything that goes up would stay up if the bible said so.

Its UNNATURAL!!1! Like DINOSAURS and a MONKEY giving birth to a HUMAN BABY!!!1

My guess is that given your view, the answer to the above riddle is A.) Fear of homos.


And please, please spare the "you're rubber" retort.
 
According to National Geographic it is natural. According to them, some ape species are almost all bisexual, and 75% of their sexual activity is nonreproductive sex. And its not limited to apes, or even mammals.

"Roy and Silo, two male chinstrap penguins at New York's Central Park Zoo have been inseparable for six years now. They display classic pair-bonding behavior—entwining of necks, mutual preening, flipper flapping, and the rest. They also have sex, while ignoring potential female mates.

Wild birds exhibit similar behavior. There are male ostriches that only court their own gender, and pairs of male flamingos that mate, build nests, and even raise foster chicks"
 
Yurt said:
fuck you, i described oral sex, dog licking balls in the most unsexual way and you're telling i was describing sodomy to you...

i've given you my reasons as to why it is natural, you've obviously ignored them.....and are now going to puss out and claim some third and final attempt.....



let's see if you have the balls to answer to this instead of insulting me and threatening me with you final attempt bullshit
Click to expand...

Oral sex is sodomy. I didn't see a question from you.
 
WinterBorn said:
You provide a link to a periodical from a group that tries to "cure" homosexuality?

I think the evidence provided by National Geographic is much more politically neutral, and therefore more acceptable.
Click to expand...
Translation: your source is biased, mine's not. LOL
 
When I read threads like this, I always end up feeling a little bad for some conservatives & what their sex lives must be like...
 
Southern Man said:
Translation: your source is biased, mine's not. LOL
Click to expand...

Your translation, for once, is fairly accurate.

This is not a new concept. The link I put up is from National Geographic. Unless you have some evidence that Nat Geo is biased, I would say it is a fairly straightforward and scientific link.

NARTH, on the other hand, has a vested interest in showing homosexuality in a certain light.
 
Southern Man said:
If it was genetic it wouldn't exist beyond a single generation.
Click to expand...

Absolute nonsense. If it was a dominant genetic trait, it would cause the end of a species. But there are plenty of genetic traits that are harmful to the species and to reproduction. And they do not cause the end of a species.
 
Southern Man said:
Sodomy is not natural.
Click to expand...

Should we dissolve the marriages of all straight people who engage in sodomy?

If it is the reason for not allowing gays to marry, it should also be a reason for straights to to not be allowed to marry.
 
WinterBorn said:
Should we dissolve the marriages of all straight people who engage in sodomy?

If it is the reason for not allowing gays to marry, it should also be a reason for straights to to not be allowed to marry.
Click to expand...

I think there are still states where sodomy is outlawed; it wasn't long ago that there were a few more on that list.

Not surprisingly, most were in the south.

The so-called "moral" Christians never seem content until they can interfere as much as they can in what adults decide to do consensually & in private...
 
Southern Man said:
Normal, natural, moral and healthy. :)
Click to expand...

Normal by what standards? I think if you asked a cross section of the population, oral sex would be considered normal.

The only sex that is natural is that had for reproduction.

Moral? Any standard that calls intimate contact between two consenting adults that love each other "immoral" is a standard that we do not need in our laws.

Healthy? If you mean this to be the contraction and spread of diseases, then lesbian sex is the healthiest sex. They have the lowest rate of HIV and other STD transmission.
 
Onceler said:
I think there are still states where sodomy is outlawed; it wasn't long ago that there were a few more on that list.

Not surprisingly, most were in the south.

The so-called "moral" Christians never seem content until they can interfere as much as they can in what adults decide to do consensually & in private...
Click to expand...

If I am not mistaken, the anti-sodomy laws have been struck down.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top