No, Sybil. You are just ignoring the Constitution again.
Illegal and unconstitutional.
Mantra 1a. Lame.
No, Sybil. You are just ignoring the Constitution again.
Illegal and unconstitutional.
Mantra 1a. Lame.
changes must be approved by state legislature to be constitutional.
this is what the constitution says.
you appear to not understand what words mean.
Those changes must ALSO conform to the requirements of their own State constitution and the Constitution of the United States.changes must be approved by state legislature to be constitutional.
this is what the constitution says.
you appear to not understand what words mean.
ok, Russiagater.Not one thing you said is true. Nothing. You are a brainwashed moron. Deep in the cult of Trump.
Those changes must ALSO conform to the requirements of their own State constitution and the Constitution of the United States.
Those changes must ALSO conform to the requirements of their own State constitution and the Constitution of the United States.
changes have to be voted on by the state legislature.No they don't. Because the state legislatures gave authority to the election boards. If there was an issue, it had to be addressed pre-election. But you didn't. Tough shit. And that is not what the Constitution says. Yet another thing that you don't understand at all, so you keep saying stupid shit.
yes they do.No they don't. Because the state legislatures gave authority to the election boards. If there was an issue, it had to be addressed pre-election. But you didn't. Tough shit. And that is not what the Constitution says. Yet another thing that you don't understand at all, so you keep saying stupid shit.
The vast majority of comments are not visible to me. Is this a question of Pa.'s mail in ballots?Correct. Their remedy for THEIR failure to file these lawsuits before the election was held is to disenfranchise everyone who voted by whatever method was ruled unconstitutional. It would be like going back and prosecuting abortion doctors for the abortions they performed before the Dobbs decision. The rules in place at the time the election is held are the rule in place for EVERYONE. Stop whining about those rules.
No it isn't, Sybil.The Constitution of the United States is silent on the method to pick electors. Do any of you know anything?
Not one thing you said is true.
No they don't. Because the state legislatures gave authority to the election boards. If there was an issue, it had to be addressed pre-election. But you didn't. Tough shit. And that is not what the Constitution says. Yet another thing that you don't understand at all, so you keep saying stupid shit.
Thanks for telling me what I already know. People who have two functioning brain cells to rub together will recognize that, over a period of time, there will be 100 million VOTES cast. For example, 20 million people voting in 5 elections would result in... you guessed it!.... 100 million votes being cast.There are not 100 million voters in Texas, moron. Mantra 1a. Lame. DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!
Interesting... who determines if changes conform to the state constitution? Do they flip a coin? Arm wrestle? Race? Rochambeau?Those changes must ALSO conform to the requirements of their own State constitution and the Constitution of the United States.
@Kamala TrumpSo, you think it's ok for voters to follow the voting rules provided them by the state... the state being the ONLY source of rules for voting.... and then the courts to nullify some portion of those votes because the STATE screwed up? You're ok with that?
The vast majority of comments are not visible to me. Is this a question of Pa.'s mail in ballots?
Well, if they're still beating that dead horse they're grasping at straws. A Republican legislature expanded mail in voting well before Covid. What the fuck is the argument? There are at least 3 states with mail only voting, and it works very well.Of course. Here's an analogy. The NFL changes the rules to make field goals worth 4 points. After the Cowboys lose the Super Bowl when the Chiefs kick a four point field goal, they demand that not only do the rules change back, but the game has to be played again. Ah, sorry, Jerry Jones. You lost. Sorry Donald Trump, you lost.
yes they do.
Article I, Section 4, Clause 1:
The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.
Word games won't work, Void.Thanks for telling me what I already know. People who have two functioning brain cells to rub together will recognize that, over a period of time, there will be 100 million VOTES cast. For example, 20 million people voting in 5 elections would result in... you guessed it!.... 100 million votes being cast.
I hope that clears up your "confusion", Cap'n Window Licker.
RQAA. Stop repeating your question mindlessly.Interesting... who determines if changes conform to the state constitution? Do they flip a coin? Arm wrestle? Race? Rochambeau?