Why is Georgia changing the election rules?

Into the Night said:
The Democrat party is a conspiracy. It is no theory. They made up the so-called 'Russian collusion' crap.

There are not 100 million voters in Texas, Void.
Click to expand...
I didn't say there were 100 million voters, you dunce.

Do you ever remove your head from your ass to see what you're typing?
 
ZenMode said:
Russian collusion was never a conspiracy theory. It was a claim/accusation that was shown to be false by the investigation.

The article YOU posted says that, since 2004, there have been 534 instances of voter fraud in Texas, out of nearly 100 million votes cast during that time. Does that really concern you?
Click to expand...

As we know, democrat election fraud is like cockroaches, for every one you catch - there are 10,000 more you don't.
 
It can't be stated enough:

The ONLY reason anyone thinks there was "massive fraud" in 2020 was because a pathological liar who can't stand losing said so. And he said the same in 2016. And he called 2012 a "sham."
 
Into the Night said:
DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!
Click to expand...
Leaen how to read, Corky. While your at it, maybe mix in an ounce of honesty. Just a thought.

"there have been 534 instances of voter fraud in Texas, out of nearly 100 million votes cast during that time."

FYI, Corky....in the English language "votes" and "voters" don't mean the same thing.

Hope the rest of your first day in 1st grade goes well.
 
ZenMode said:
No, it's not. The few changes that were made during COVID, without legislative approval, does not mean that is the norm. It's clearly the exception.
Click to expand...
but it does make that particular election and form of fraud unconsitutional, provably so.

the rules were changed. there was no state legislative approval.

two facts.
 
Kamala Trump said:
but it does make that particular election and form of fraud unconsitutional, provably so.

the rules were changed. there was no state legislative approval.

two facts.
Click to expand...
First, not all of the changes were determined, by the courts, to be illegal.

Second, there's no reason to believe that the changes resulted in a single additional fraudulent vote.

Third, the time for Trump to raise the question of potentially illegal changes was before the election; not after he lost, not after. You don't try to nullify peoples' votes after the fact.
 
Last edited:
ZenMode said:
First, not all of the changes were determined, by the courts, to be illegal.

Second, there's no reason to believe that the changes resulted in a single additional fraudulent vote.

Third, the time for Trump to raise the question of potentially illegal changes was before the election; not after he lost, not after. You don't try to nullify peoples' votes after the fact.
Click to expand...
if they;re not approved by the state legislature, they;re not constitutional.

period.
 
Kamala Trump said:
if they;re not approved by the state legislature, they;re not constitutional.

period.
Click to expand...

You appear not to understand how the various branches of government function. State legislatures give wide latitude to election boards to make decisions about how elections are run. I know this is a hard concept for you to grasp. Maybe we can do a fraggle rock music video to help you understand better.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top