Into the Night
Verified User
How can you justify that????
Already answered. Watt for watt, nuclear power is MUCH cheaper than either wind or solar.
How can you justify that????
In fact, more people have died installing windmills then have died from nuclear accidents
That doesn't explain how nuclear power is more economical.
The "left" is a religion, and it's a really fucking stupid religion.
How do you justify what you posted????
Have you ever been at a commercial nuclear plant?????????????
Okay. I won't. That accident released no radioactive material. No one was killed. It was equipment damage only.And Three Mile Island, don't forget that one.
Nuthin' wrong with that!It's likely that, in the future, we will have to return to building new nuke plants.
Already done. You put the waste fuel from one of these reactors into another type of reactor. The waste from THAT reactor can easily be disposed of as normal solid waste.Let's hope that the sci guys can figure out better ways to deal with the extremely long-lasting byproducts of this source of energy.
When did Three Mile Island secede from the United States?
OMFG, are you fucking serious? That might be the dumbest thing ever posted on JPP.
"The Three Mile Island accident was a partial meltdown of the Three Mile Island, Unit 2 (TMI-2) reactor on the Susquehanna River in Londonderry Township, Pennsylvania, near the Pennsylvania capital of Harrisburg. It began at 4 a.m.[2][3] on March 28, 1979, and released radioactive gases and radioactive iodine into the environment. It is the worst accident in U.S. commercial nuclear power plant history.[4] On the seven-point International Nuclear Event Scale, it is rated Level 5 – Accident with Wider Consequences.[5][6]"
Yet another #EpicTrollFail.
Incorrect. The plants cost BILLIONS to build and millions to safely maintain. Do you really think the utility company is going to eat that? Nope. YOU get to pay for it. Anecdotally, we Ameren Electric customers saw our bills jump when the Calloway plant near Fulton MO came on line in the mid-1980s. I recall my summer electric bill being nearly as high as our rent.
And billions more to decommission.
Then there’s the problem of nuclear waste!
OMG, Here you are telling us that nuclear energy is the cheapest, but you don't have a clue about the economics about commercial nuclear plants.
It doesn’t add to climate change, it would massively reduce our reliance on fossil fuels, it would clog up the environment with windmills and solar panels and it’s extremely cheap
So why are you folks on the left against this power supply?
Who's afraid? Ruskies?
Sorry, you can't switch the focus of topic because you won't concede a point. The two examples I gave clearly refer to incidences within a decent time frame that demonstrates how NOT safe nuke plants are.
As for deaths due to increasing climate change; please go to the library and look at the reports by reputable newspapers & magazines regarding deaths due to "unprecedented" weather extremes in the last 5 years.
This is not a game of numbers...this is about PREVENTING the need to play such gruesome comparative games.
Not quite, when the flood happened the plant was in cold shutdown mode, NOT totally "defueled". That means "the coolant system is typically lowered to pump water at atmospheric pressure, and the reactor vessel remains below 93 °C (200 °F), and water passing through it will not boil."
Still radioactive, son. Still in danger of critical problems had the aforementioned systems were compromised should the water had risen just a few more feet.
In other words, by the Grace of God a bullet was dodged.
Got that?
Strawman.
Shortages are the foundation of power.
Cheap, effective, and plentiful energy is what the left fears most. It would be a serious blow to their plans for totalitarian dictatorship.
This is why Newsom is trying to shut off the water supply to California - it will give the Reich absolute power over life and death for 80 million people.