Thank You. (It's sad how many on the 'Left' are unaware of the 'Christian Agenda')
Will Queers still be allowed to 'Marry' ?
- Thread starter Jack
- Start date
Thank You. (It's sad how many on the 'Left' are unaware of the 'Christian Agenda')
You may have. I haven't.
The Constitution prohibits religion from being used to make government decisions.
Biblical law also prohibits sex outside of marriage. Are we going to enforce that?
At what age did you choose women over men?
Any reason 'Christians' want to put 'The Ten Commandments' in every Courthouse?
Roe v. Wade was based on when the baby is viable.
To express their Christian (and Jewish) principles.
But, as you know, there is no secular purpose in making that decision and that is why it is unconstitutional.
That is why the baby can be aborted the first six months.
--->"To express their Christian (and Jewish) principles."<---
I agree. (Do you think it has 'meaning' in a Judicial setting?)
Jack: "Pretty sure most of us know that 'life' begins when sperm enters the egg. The actual Argument is, ... when can the Host terminate that Life ... and does she need consent of the Donor."
Flash: "Roe v. Wade was based on when the baby is viable."
So we both agree 'Life' (the baby) begins at conception.
Flash: "That is why the baby can be aborted the first six months."
Jack: And we both agree that the 'baby' (Life) can be killed at the discretion of the Host.
It is a religious document. Just because 2-3 of the commandments relate to secular laws does not give it a secular purpose--well established by court decisions.
For the first six months of pregnancy. After that a state can prohibit abortion if they choose; unless the mother's life is in danger and then it can be allowed later.
Why have a stone Monument of the 'religious document' sitting on public property in front of a Courthouse?
The implication is that 'Religious Law' is a consideration at the Courthouse.
Yes. That is what the Law says now.
Any guess what the 'Law' will say after the Christian Conservatives take over the Supreme Court?
Not many changes. The may approve some of the restrictions like requiring doctors to have admitting privileges. Medical science may have made advances in viability which may change the trimester guidelines. But I don't think they will overturn Roe. The conservatives have expressed strong support for precedent. If they overturn Roe, it will go back to the states to make laws and abortion was already legal for most of the population before Roe.
I guess the 'Left' is making a mountain out of a molehill over this Supreme Court appointment. Great to know nothing much will change. (place skeptical emoji here)
Both sides try to predict major changes as a scare tactic. History shows us major dramatic changes seldom occur.
The SC cannot just decide to hear a case about something. They have to wait for a relevant case to come to them from the lower courts. If someone tried to challenge abortion it would most likely be thrown out by the lower courts because the SC already ruled on that issue in 1973.
Keep telling yourself that.
"Dominion theology (also known as dominionism) is a group of Christian political ideologies that seek to institute a nation governed by Christians based on their understandings of biblical law. Extents of rule and ways of achieving governing authority are varied. For example, dominion theology can include theonomy, but does not necessarily involve advocating Mosaic law as the basis of government. The label is applied primarily toward groups of Christians in the United States."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominion_theology