Worker Rights: The Cause To Unite All Americans

[Truck Fump / h1b]

If you believe in Capitalism; then, Globalization must be as Good as Greed.

No. It's stupid.

greed is also bad.

The 80's were a fascist triumph in america.

gordon gecko is a tranny.

 

[danielpalos]

No. It's stupid.

greed is also bad.

The 80's were a fascist triumph in america.

gordon gecko is a tranny.

You hate Capitalism? Why proclaim the opposite in socialism threads when y'all want to try to convince everyone y'all are for capitalism instead of just plain socialism on a national or international basis.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Imagine if every Amazon warehouse worker went on strike. This is why Bezos dreads unions.

Bezos would simply replace them with new workers. It's not as if being an Amazon warehouse worker is skilled labor.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

If right-wingers are simply clueless and Causeless, why vote for them?

Because they aren't?

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Since right-wingers don't believe in being legal to our own at-will employment laws, why should the left take right-wingers seriously about legality to the laws in border threads?

A complex question fallacy, red herring, and non sequitur all in one. You conflate two things that are mutually exclusive.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

Bezos would simply replace them with new workers. It's not as if being an Amazon warehouse worker is skilled labor.

this is why border enforement is key to maintaining the standard of living for the average american.

globalization is a race to the bottom.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

this is why border enforement is key to maintaining the standard of living for the average american.

globalization is a race to the bottom.

Not to mention into a modern version of slavery.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

Not to mention into a modern version of slavery.

we should have never allowed human slavery onto the open international labor market by giving china wto entry and favored nation status.

very dumb.

 

[danielpalos]

A complex question fallacy, red herring, and non sequitur all in one. You conflate two things that are mutually exclusive.

Not at all. You are simply clueless and Causeless like usual for the right-wing. It is about hypocrisy.

 

[danielpalos]

this is why border enforement is key to maintaining the standard of living for the average american.

globalization is a race to the bottom.

Nobody takes right-wingers seriously about economics. Socialism on a national and international basis is all they know.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

Nobody takes right-wingers seriously about economics. Socialism on a national and international basis is all they know.

yes. right wingers are renowned socialists. and left wingers are the new family values people, as long as you want to chop off your son's penis.

 

[danielpalos]

yes. right wingers are renowned socialists. and left wingers are the new family values people, as long as you want to chop off your son's penis.

Who cares what right-wingers fantasize about?

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

Who cares what right-wingers fantasize about?

You're a fraudulent fucktard.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Not at all. You are simply clueless and Causeless like usual for the right-wing. It is about hypocrisy.

And now with the ad hominem...

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Nobody takes right-wingers seriously about economics. Socialism on a national and international basis is all they know.

Okay, I'll bite! Which Leftist economists do you consider paragons of intellect in their views on the economy?

 

[danielpalos]

Okay, I'll bite! Which Leftist economists do you consider paragons of intellect in their views on the economy?

lol. Everybody on the left seems to understand economics.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

lol. Everybody on the left seems to understand economics.

That doesn't answer my question, it dodges it with a non sequitur. Here's a question for you, seeing as how you believe the above:

Does welfare and other social welfare spending programs grow the economy?

For example, this quote from Pelosi:

Pelosi: 'Extending Unemployment Benefits Is Best Way to Stimulate Economy'

https://pelosi.house.gov/sites/pelo...ses/prExtendingUnemploymentBenifits051403.htm

Is she correct? What's your economic analysis of that?

 

[danielpalos]

That doesn't answer my question, it dodges it with a non sequitur. Here's a question for you, seeing as how you believe the above:

Does welfare and other social welfare spending programs grow the economy?

Thanks for asking. Solving for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is more market-friendly and economically efficient.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Thanks for asking. Solving for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is more market-friendly and economically efficient.

Is there unemployment in other systems of economics?

 

[danielpalos]

That doesn't answer my question, it dodges it with a non sequitur. Here's a question for you, seeing as how you believe the above:

Does welfare and other social welfare spending programs grow the economy?

For example, this quote from Pelosi:


https://pelosi.house.gov/sites/pelo...ses/prExtendingUnemploymentBenifits051403.htm

Is she correct? What's your economic analysis of that?

The multiplier effect for Unemployment Insurance is at least 1.7, meaning that a $100 increase in government spending leads to $70 additional GDP in the private sector.6 This 1.7 multiplier effect is based on the effect of fiscal stimulus during the Great Recession of 2007–2009. The expansion of Unemployment Insurance during the Great Recession had an even greater impact—about 1.9, which means that every $100 spent on Unemployment Insurance led to $90 additional GDP value.7