Your president will select a supreme count judge on one issue.

[evince]

how can anyone think trump would do anything but try to be Americans putin?

get real

 

[leaningright]

Morality???

What the hell does an American conservative know about morality?

This post deserves a groan...but I won’t do it..I won’t groan it...I won’t..

 

[jbander1]

Only a snowflake would equate a loyal constitutionalist as a radical righty. The true Litmus Test will come from the left when they attempt to character assassinate anyone that does not agree with their ideology of DEATH and IMMORALILTY. Can any posts such as this one actually come from an American Citizen? Me thinks there is a fascist in the woodpile attempting to divide and conquer. Again they do not comprehend the ability of the American Peoples...of all races and all creeds to come together when the real shit hits the fan.

Boring, You have already sold out your country for hate, so tell me why I should consider anything you say for any reason.

 

[countryboy]

That issue is if they promise to find him not guilty in their court. Quality doesn't count. He wants a hater but that's not hard these days but the deciding point is how they will judge him and even if the right found that out to be 100% true , they wouldn't care. They care nothing about democracy. They have no qualms about dictatorship, if it's their dictator. They have totally sold out this great country and got conned by the biggest most obvious con man in history. Reflecting on their lack of intelligence.

As stupid as ever, eh bandicoot? The issue is whether or not we can place radical leftists in internment camps. For their own good of course.

 

[jbander1]

SCOTUS will have only tangential impact on anything regarding Donald Trump.

Impeachment is the remedy...if something is established.

In any case, I hope I never see the day where a former president or a former presidential candidate is put into prison. If we do see that...NO MATTER WHO THE PERSON IS...we might as well kiss the Republic good-by.

Nonsense. no one is above the law, the exact opposite of what you say is true. to turn the other cheek on a criminal act by a sitting president, that's the death knell. I have no idea where you see the slightest substance in your stand.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

 

[Nordberg]

Nonsense. no one is above the law, the exact opposite of what you say is true. to turn the other cheek on a criminal act by a sitting president, that's the death knell. I have no idea where you see the slightest substance in your stand.

Old thinking. trump recognizes the danger of the Supremes to his plans. That is why he wants to remake the court. He has done it to all the other institutions, although taking over the FBI is in progress.

The Supremes were what stopped Nixon. they will not do it to Trump.

 

[CFM]

We all know that's true, but few here will admit it.


Imagine that, a criminal picking his own Judge

Do you claim to speak for everyone?

 

[CFM]

Morality???

What the hell does an American conservative know about morality?

That's hilarious coming from someone that supports a woman killing the life she created by spreading her legs. That's hilarious coming from someone that thinks two men or two women being together is acceptable.

 

[Legion]

That issue is if they promise to find him not guilty in their court.

Is that so? Who told you that?

 

[Legion]

trump STOLE the office with Russian help

Think so, racist liar?

 

[Legion]

We all know that's true, but few here will admit it.

I don't know that its true, whitey.

Have another drink.

 

[CFM]

I don't know that its true, whitey.

Have another drink.

By using "we", do you think Bourbon believes he speaks for everyone?

 

[Legion]

By using "we", do you think Bourbon believes he speaks for everyone?

It's not evident to me as a sober observer exactly what Burpin' believes.

What matters logically is what he can prove.

 

[CFM]

It's not evident to me as a sober observer exactly what Burpin' believes.

What matters logically is what he can prove.

Wouldn't the use of "we" be the proof needed to support the claim that he believes he speaks for everyone?

 

[Legion]

Wouldn't the use of "we" be the proof needed to support the claim that he believes he speaks for everyone?

It's certainly an indication. Good point.

 

[Nordberg]

if he has a compliant SCOTUS he owns the nation

He already has a very compliant Supremes, and it is about to get worse. Trump demands loyalty.

 

[Mason Michaels]

Trump wants loyalty. he demanded that from Comey and Gorsuck. That will be the first qualification he will demand. That in turn is what he sees as a safeguard for his deeds. He nearly backed out of Gorsuck because of insufficient ass kissing.

It's a job for life,Trump has no power to demand loyalty after they are appointed

 

[Flash]

That issue is if they promise to find him not guilty in their court. Quality doesn't count. He wants a hater but that's not hard these days but the deciding point is how they will judge him and even if the right found that out to be 100% true , they wouldn't care. They care nothing about democracy. They have no qualms about dictatorship, if it's their dictator. They have totally sold out this great country and got conned by the biggest most obvious con man in history. Reflecting on their lack of intelligence.

BS. The Supreme Court does not find anybody guilty or not guilty. Believing wild claims makes it even crazier when it is not based on reality.

 

[Flash]

It's a job for life,Trump has no power to demand loyalty after they are appointed

They know that. They are just making up negative stuff so they will have something to complain about. "The sky is falling."