Woman driving corvette 155 mph kills father of two. Liberals are silent

NiftyNiblick said:
The spilt was inevitable for a multi-cultural nation with a poorly written constitution.
I don't see how it could have been avoided.

As for those "family" TV series to which you alluded, you didn't find them to be cornball crap?
They're laughably campy now, I suppose, but they weren't anything that I could sit through.

I was more into the Honeymooners.
Those were more real people.
Click to expand...

You are the worst kind of fool, old, man, an old fool.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
We had just finished the most horrific war in the history of humanity,
and our government was immediately afterward engaging in a cold war with our former allies
as though nobody had had enough yet.

Both sides, furthermore, were persecuting domestic dissidents.
Failing to mention that would be truly disingenuous.

People were desperate for fluff and for avoiding reasons to think in that era.
It was perfectly understandable.

When things started to settle down,
all of our usual domestic hostilities resurfaced.

Our nation is clearly comprised of incompatible people.
Our nation is always challenged by the daunting task of making multiculturalism work somehow.
Click to expand...

Go back to bed, old man.

Multiculturalism has destroyed Europe and the far left Democratic Socialist loons like you are in the process of destroying America.
 
Earl said:
Go back to bed, old man.

Multiculturalism has destroyed Europe and the far left Democratic Socialist loons like you are in the process of destroying America.
Click to expand...

Not even Hitler could totally destroy Europe Sir.

But, it is the evil forces of strong men like Putin, that is trying to destroy it all over again.

And, we are not going to allow a PHONY strong man like TRUMP, to get elected and join forces with Putin, to destroy America or Europe either!

Next!
 
Into the Night said:
People who ride motorcycles did not sign up to be mangled. You don't have to be an adrenaline junkie to ride a motorcycle.
Click to expand...

But 99% of motorcycle owners are thrill-seeking adrenaline junkies. If they stayed on motorcycles it might be ok, but they also drive 3 ton trucks and SUVs 100 mph . They are a public menace.
 
Into the Night said:
The roads have become safer too.

Used to be that guardrails were almost a joke. Light poles stood tough like a tree while your car wrapped around it. Even signposts could slice a car in half.

Now freeways are wider, straighter, and equipped with breakaway poles and signposts. Exit frogs are equipped with crash mitigation barriers (either water barrels or crushible metal barriers). Even construction equipment has scorpion trucks that protect work crews with collapsible barriers to mitigate collisions. Ends if guardrails are not buried so they won't skewer the car if it hits it. Opposing lanes are now often protected by Jersey barriers that are designed to throw the car back into a lane that is at least moving the same direction.

The cars also are safer. They are lighter and more maneuverable. They use FADEC technology for reliable engine operation. They have driver assist systems available that reduce driver fatigue including follower cruise control and even steering assist. Sensor all around the car now warn of low tire pressure, the presence of a car in an adjacent lane, proximity sensors, backup cameras, loose doors, etc.

A lot has changed since the days of the double nickel nonsense.

Below 55, cars tend to have greater rolling drag than air drag. Above 55, cars tend to have a definite air drag greater than rolling drag.
AT 55 is the transition point where most cars are momentarily caught in that unstable between point. That speed wastes fuel. Above or below is more efficient and the car behaves better on the road.

Of all the speeds the idiot government could've chosen for the idiotic national speed limit...That's Democrats for ya.

Glad it's gone. It was unconstitutional anyway.
Click to expand...

Everything you said is a lie except the last sentence. Yes - speed limits are a state issue.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
I think that you're just afraid of cars, TDAK.:laugh:
Click to expand...

We really don't know much about TDAK's story.

He could be a paraplegic, physically and Mentally damaged and emotionally scarred because of some careless Driver while texting.

Or, he could just be an Asshole, still living in his Mom's Trailer House, and using her computer to troll the world- BECAUSE HE IS JUST A TOTAL LOSER.

But, whatever his case, he is one fucked up individual and there is just no excuse for his racism and hatred expressed towards ALL others.
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
But 99% of motorcycle owners are thrill-seeking adrenaline junkies. If they stayed on motorcycles it might be ok, but they also drive 3 ton trucks and SUVs 100 mph . They are a public menace.
Click to expand...

Argument from randU fallacy. You cannot just make up numbers and use them as 'data'. You don't have to be an adrenaline junkie to ride a motorcycle.

Speeding in any vehicle is a menace. Motorcycle riders don't necessarily speed. 3 ton trucks and SUVs don't necessarily speed either.
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
Irrelevant???? HAHAHAHA I caught this miserable tranny in two brazen lies and he says that's irrelevant!
Click to expand...

Irrelevant. That it was Nixon, not Carter, changes nothing. My mistake on that, but it is irrelevant as we're discussing the effects of lowering speed limits not particularly who is lowering them.

So, you haven't caught me in "two brazen lies" but rather have raised an reductio ad absurdum argument repeatedly now.
 
Geeko Sportivo said:
We really don't know much about TDAK's story.

He could be a paraplegic, physically and Mentally damaged and emotionally scarred because of some careless Driver while texting.

Or, he could just be an Asshole, still living in his Mom's Trailer House, and using her computer to troll the world- BECAUSE HE IS JUST A TOTAL LOSER.

But, whatever his case, he is one fucked up individual and there is just no excuse for his racism and hatred expressed towards ALL others.
Click to expand...

I DON'T ALLOW TRANNIES TO TALK THAT WAY ABOUT ME
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Irrelevant. That it was Nixon, not Carter, changes nothing. My mistake on that, but it is irrelevant as we're discussing the effects of lowering speed limits not particularly who is lowering them.
Click to expand...

Yes it is relevant, as it proves you don't check things out and just make stuff up. Why should anyone believe anything you say?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top