moon
Satire for Sanity
Hmmm... So now you have to resort to name calling? Looks to me like your gettin' yo azz whooped
You're the dullard who feels the need to resort to stupid emoticons for support, gun-slinger.
Hmmm... So now you have to resort to name calling? Looks to me like your gettin' yo azz whooped
Hmmm... So now you have to resort to name calling? Looks to me like your gettin' yo azz whooped
I have plenty to go with my guns. If you have a problem with that, come and try to take either one of them, raghead.
Attention-seeking fool.
You either don't have as big of a problem with me having them or you're simply too much of a cowardly raghead to try and do anything about it.
Go swat some more butterflies with your banjo-bat, wanker.
OK- so the thread has squeezed a couple of zits. Now does any genuinely concerned person have any ideas as to why there are 40 million people in poverty in North America ?
Social science research has found there is almost no poverty among those who: 1) finish high school 2) defer having children until marriage 3) work full-time.
"Behavioral Aspects of Poverty"
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-behavioral-aspects-of-poverty/
OK- so the thread has squeezed a couple of zits. Now does any genuinely concerned person have any ideas as to why there are 40 million people in poverty in North America ?
When one must blame others for their own failures, success becomes unreachable. Think about it...
Go away, fool. You've already made your negative contributions. Don't you have something that needs oiling ?
Accepting that then- almost 40 million Americans did not finish high school ?
No, that can't be right. Some of those 40 million people in poverty will be kids that aren't old enough yet to finish high school.
High school is only one criteria. A high school graduate with no job and children with no spouse is likely to be poor. The children (who are not old enough to finish high school) are poor because their parents failed to meet those conditions.
Do you think that the current government is capable of initiating something similar to the ' Public Works Administration ' of the Great Depression without negative projects like wars or The Wall ?
How about the de-mechanization of farming ?
I don't think a PWA is a good idea since we are already making huge increases in the debt.
Also, it is unnecessary. When the PWA was created there were no jobs but today unemployment is only 4.1% which is almost full employment. Many employers cannot find enough employees. A local lumber mill is hiring young workers at $29 an hour but cannot find enough (mostly because they can't pass the drug test). Maybe we should add "pass a drug test" to the requirements to stay out of poverty.
I think the de-mechanization of farming is going backwards. It increases the price of food and creates jobs most people don't want.
What has caused this debt and how is it being added to ? Isn't it wars, weapons and hand-outs to bum foreign regimes ?
What has caused this debt and how is it being added to ? Isn't it wars, weapons and hand-outs to bum foreign regimes ?
Where are the city jobs ? Isn't there scope for PWA there ? Most cities, apart from their show-case centres, are run-down.
Are you sure that drug-taking precedes being unemployed and not the other way around ?
I'd pay more to reduce the 40 million.
I'm the thread's author. Where's your anti-poverty thread ?
Tell me- all those hundreds of thousands, maybe millions of tonnes of munitions expended in Iraq- to name but one. Who did they enrich ? Who did they enrich ?
No, I'm not blind. I am against it. Answer my question, what are you doing to offset our poverty since you're so concerned about it?