floridafan
Verified User
Your post #38 has no link. Did your handlers forget to include one.
Biden's Tax the Rich Scheme
- Thread starter Libhater
- Start date
Your post #38 has no link. Did your handlers forget to include one.
Wrong.
The Trump Tax Cuts Were Not 'Tax Cuts for the Rich' - WSJ
Wall Street Journal
https://www.wsj.com › Opinion › Letters
Sep 13, 2022 — IRS data reveal that all income brackets benefited as result of the Trump tax reforms, with the most significant benefits accruing to working- ...
Yakuda
Verified User
Taxes are a disincentive across the board. The only reason you idiots want to raise taxes is to pay for the shit you want to give to your base. You morons don't give a fuck about deficits. Go sell that shit to your retarded friends.
floridafan
Verified User
Yes everyone benefitted from Trump tax cuts, to the tune of an 8 trillion deficit.
Post no. 38 is your post, dummy.
floridafan
Verified User
Trump runs up an $8 trillion deficit and you say nothing, yet we are the ones who dont care about deficits?
floridafan
Verified User
Where is the link you referred to?
floridafan
Verified User
Middle class got crumbs, which soon expire. The wealthy made out like bandits.
So, you posted about a link that was expired and then accuse me of posting post no 38 when it's your post.
You didn't even read my original link because it had expired yet you commented on it.
What a dummy!
Are you 12 years old?
https://www.heritage.org/taxes/report/how-taxes-reduce-savings
Last edited:
Yakuda
Verified User
You don't care about deficits. You care about republican deficits but shithead deficits you love. How many times do you retards need to hear that not everyone is as stupid as a leftist.
Wrong.
The Trump Tax Cuts Were Not 'Tax Cuts for the Rich' - WSJ
Wall Street Journal
https://www.wsj.com › Opinion › Letters
Sep 13, 2022 — IRS data reveal that all income brackets benefited as result of the Trump tax reforms, with the most significant benefits accruing to working- ...
floridafan
Verified User
Only a Republican could accomplish $8 trillion in deficits while at the same time promising to balance the budget. Yet you say nothing, other than cut more taxes which of course will lead to higher deficits, and brag about how great a job the last president did.
floridafan
Verified User
What good are any tax cuts, that come with $8 trillion in deficits.
https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-f...-needs-a-tax-cut-trump-didnt-give-it-to-them/
Discussing economics with these far left loons is akin to explaining trigonometric identities or derivatives in math to a first grader.
Yakuda
Verified User
And democrats spend more than they get in revenue and generate huge deficits. It's amazing how fucking stupid are.
What a numbskull. There probably are more Democrats who own stock than Republicans, Democrats having a clear majority of registered voters. The rich once paid a much higher percentage of their income in federal taxes than they do today, and in those years the country in general was more prosperous than it is today.
Yakuda
Verified User
The first grader is smarter. They want to use taxes to fund their goodies programs for their base.
Well, Marty, the ambulance chaser posted that Americans are now paying the highest federal tax rate in history.
QP!
Verified User
If you tax your boss more he may reduce job positions to increase his own income to replace his tax losses. If you tax rich investors they have less money to invest in the stock market. You aren't very smart about the economy thing.That is probably why you think Unions are good.
"may". lol
You are the one who is not smart.
The American billionaires are trying to move the US more to the Russia like Oligarch model and they are succeeding.
YOu have shown no knowledge about the 'economy thing' :: laugh :: as you need to establish FIRST that reducing job positions will not just cost the boss MORE income.
You are assuming these bosses are poor managers running fat companies and keeping excess jobs for no reason, that the second taxes are raised on them they cut. You have to show your work on that as that would make them dumb and bad bosses.
The reality is in the "economy thing" if a boss is smart and his business well run he would either have already cut that staff (if over staffed) or added more staff (if under staffed) and the tax increase on him personally would not be motivator of that. And him just then cutting staff would reduce the service he could deliver and thus cost him even more money.