Can Artificial Intelligence have free will?

Most people don't know about VPN's.

Some do, and some use them. If you operate anything like a forum, you will still see IPs coming from the same VPN for sock accounts.
Even if the guy is using a public computer (such as a library), you will see that pattern. Not everyone in that library is using that forum, after all.

The Sock's definition of a sock is anyone that disagrees with him.
 
Okay, Sock. You are lying.

You lie about your education.
You lie about your socks.
You lie about your 'patriotism' and try to hide behind the Constitution you despise.
You lie about the effectiveness of a VPN and how many people use them.
You lie about your own posts.

You're a liar, Sock.
Bulverism. Bigotry.
Bulverism fallacy. Bigotry.
Bulverism. Bigotry. False Authority.
bigotry, bulverism,
 
200w.webp
200w.webp
200w.webp

I find The Sock boring.
I think you give Terry far too much credit for being interesting.

He hasn't posted an argument for months on this forum.
That sounds too much like an implication that Terry has, at some point prior, posted what could be loosely called an argument. I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt but I really am struggling to find some way to stretch the definition of "spam" to include "making an argument."

He just insults people, makes up random shit, and accuses everyone of being a sock.
... and agrees with whatever Cypress posts. Say it with me ... "Agreed." One more time ... "Agreed."

I have to commend you on the way you bend over backwards to be nice to Terry. I don't think I could do it. Kudos.

2b35e207368e06a2bfedb331e62d9ad7.jpg
 
https://media2.giphy.com/media/J4JPepgkBLpsqbVXLO/200w.webp?cid=ecf05e47tj0mz6vi4vdxm614a1xi59fj1okeyogfg11ofohc&ep=v1_gifs_search&rid=200w.webp&ct=g[/IM][IMG]https://media2.giphy.com/media/J4JPepgkBLpsqbVXLO/200w.webp?cid=ecf05e47tj0mz6vi4vdxm614a1xi59fj1okeyogfg11ofohc&ep=v1_gifs_search&rid=200w.webp&ct=g[/IM][IMG]https://media2.giphy.com/media/J4JPepgkBLpsqbVXLO/200w.webp?cid=ecf05e47tj0mz6vi4vdxm614a1xi59fj1okeyogfg11ofohc&ep=v1_gifs_search&rid=200w.webp&ct=g[/IM][/CENTER]

I think you give Terry far too much credit for being interesting.

That sounds too much like an implication that Terry has, at some point prior, posted what could be loosely called an argument. I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt but I really am struggling to find some way to stretch the definition of "spam" to include "making an argument."

... and agrees with whatever Cypress posts. Say it with me ... "Agreed." One more time ... "Agreed."

I have to commend you on the way you bend over backwards to be nice to Terry. I don't think I could do it. Kudos.

[CENTER][IMG]https://i.pinimg.com/750x/2b/35/e2/2b35e207368e06a2bfedb331e62d9ad7.jpg[/IM][/CENTER][/QUOTE]Bulverism. Bigotry.
[QUOTE="Into the Night, post: 0"]Bulverism fallacy. Bigotry.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE="gfm7175, post: 3787275, member: 7449"]Bulverism. Bigotry. False Authority.[/QUOTE][QUOTE="IBDaMann, post: 5507009, member: 8245"]bigotry, bulverism, [/QUOTE]​
 
I've ran forums before, they can easily track IP addresses so ask them how many accounts I have under mine unless you think I'm posting from the library all day.

Regardless, who cares how many accounts a person uses, it's about what their posting, not their name.

Dutch isn't a Doctor he just plays one on JPP!
FYI socks are legal on JPP!
 
https://media2.giphy.com/media/10JhviFuU2gWD6/giphy.webp?cid=ecf05e47lq7cwyvwn631h4rdsw5ose94zri7ji3xcsy2a13b&ep=v1_gifs_search&rid=giphy.webp&ct=g[/IM][IMG]https://media2.giphy.com/media/10JhviFuU2gWD6/giphy.webp?cid=ecf05e47lq7cwyvwn631h4rdsw5ose94zri7ji3xcsy2a13b&ep=v1_gifs_search&rid=giphy.webp&ct=g[/IM][IMG]https://media2.giphy.com/media/10JhviFuU2gWD6/giphy.webp?cid=ecf05e47lq7cwyvwn631h4rdsw5ose94zri7ji3xcsy2a13b&ep=v1_gifs_search&rid=giphy.webp&ct=g[/IM][/CENTER]


Too funny. You have relegated yourself to proving my point. Thank you.

[CENTER][IMG]https://i.pinimg.com/750x/81/53/f6/8153f65b3615444e4f9f695fff06767a.jp​
Bulverism. Bigotry.
Bulverism fallacy. Bigotry.
Bulverism. Bigotry. False Authority.
bigotry, bulverism,
 
In addition to the LLM (Large Language Model), however, a language agent has files that record its beliefs, desires, plans, and observations as sentences of natural language. The language agent uses the LLM to form a plan of action based on its beliefs and desires. In this way, the cognitive architecture of language agents is familiar from folk psychology.

https://dailynous.com/2023/07/04/a-case-for-ai-wellbeing-guest-post/

For the record: we are no where near true artificial intelligence.

No Mr. Data

No Matrix

No Colossus (The Forbin Project)

Nope, we've got a LONG way to go. What we DO have is more sophisticated programming in the fields of computation, surveillance, CGI....and the ability to scare the general public into believing anything they're told.
 
For the record: we are no where near true artificial intelligence.

No Mr. Data

No Matrix

No Colossus (The Forbin Project)

Nope, we've got a LONG way to go. What we DO have is more sophisticated programming in the fields of computation, surveillance, CGI....and the ability to scare the general public into believing anything they're told.

We have a long way to go for what?
 
For the record: we are no where near true artificial intelligence.

No Mr. Data

No Matrix

No Colossus (The Forbin Project)

Nope, we've got a LONG way to go. What we DO have is more sophisticated programming in the fields of computation, surveillance, CGI....and the ability to scare the general public into believing anything they're told.

If you are referencing a computer that is self-aware with Free Will, I agree. It's just better programming.
 
For the record: we are no where near true artificial intelligence.

No Mr. Data

No Matrix

No Colossus (The Forbin Project)

Nope, we've got a LONG way to go. What we DO have is more sophisticated programming in the fields of computation, surveillance, CGI....and the ability to scare the general public into believing anything they're told.

As far as you know.

Technology is estimated to be around 12 years further advanced then the public knows.
 
More like 12.37 years.

Could be.

It's somewhere around there.

Point is that it's at least a decade more advanced then we currently know.

Plus we also don't know what breakthroughs other nations like China have made in AI and from what I gather they are investing heavily in it.

This is why I believe it's stupid for us to try to regulate it at this point because AI will be the future of wars.

Whoever get's the jump on AI will have all the power.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
For the record: we are no where near true artificial intelligence.

No Mr. Data

No Matrix

No Colossus (The Forbin Project)

Nope, we've got a LONG way to go. What we DO have is more sophisticated programming in the fields of computation, surveillance, CGI....and the ability to scare the general public into believing anything they're told.


We have a long way to go for what?


re-read what I wrote above.
 
Back
Top