And we know Gardner always lies.Sorry, Sky News is right-biased and fails fact checks. I'm suspicious that any video they posted was recut to show Harris in a bad light.
And we know Gardner always lies.Sorry, Sky News is right-biased and fails fact checks. I'm suspicious that any video they posted was recut to show Harris in a bad light.
I really liked Adam Schiff, but not anymore.Shame on Schumer. I lost respect for him.
lol.I asked if you could post a word salad of Harris's that's similar to trump's. Either you can or you can't.
I was shocked. Now I am just very angry.I really liked Adam Schiff, but not anymore.
You are making ad hominem. The source is irrelevant. The video content speaks for itself. Defend the gibberish Harris babbled in those videos.Sorry, Sky News Australia is right-biased and fails fact checks. I'm suspicious that any video they posted was recut to show Harris in a bad light.
Did you read the part about changing the words of videos via AI editing? That's why I want to READ the actual words.You are making ad hominem. The source is irrelevant. The video content speaks for itself. Defend the gibberish Harris babbled in those videos.
AI can manufacture any person saying what they want it to say.Did you read the part about changing the words of videos via AI editing? That's why I want to READ the actual words.
This AI Can Change What People Say In A Video, By Just Editing Its Transcript
Prove they did that since all of those videos are available from multiple sources. Also explain how if they changed what she said over several minutes, how they also edited her face to sync her mouth's movement to the new words.Did you read the part about changing the words of videos via AI editing? That's why I want to READ the actual words.
This AI Can Change What People Say In A Video, By Just Editing Its Transcript
Absolutely, and I've seen examples people posted right on this forum.AI can manufacture any person saying what they want it to say.
Yeah, I looked it up. Sky News Australia, Fox News, Megyn Kelly, Tucker Carlson... all RWNJs.Prove they did that since all of those videos are available from multiple sources. Also explain how if they changed what she said over several minutes, how they also edited her face to sync her mouth's movement to the new words.
That's ad hominem. You are attacking the source, not the content. Try to change 2 to 5 minutes of someone speaking that way and make it convincing. Isn't happening.Yeah, I looked it up. Sky News Australia, Fox News, Megyn Kelly, Tucker Carlson... all RWNJs.
Read the link I posted, it explained about editing the face etc. And there's an actual video showing a change.
Watch and learn how it's done.So did Forbes do that?
Did FOX? How would FOX get away with that and not get caught?
How about NBC? Did they alter their clips?
She is an incoherent speaker. She can't string a paragraph together, and often has trouble making coherent sentences.
all the good things......open borders, high inflation, prohibitive energy costs, world unrest.........oh, and a good pair of knee pads.......The number one thing people do not like about Joe Biden is his age. If you take that factor out, the Democrats win big time. Remember Trump is only two years younger than Biden. Kamala Harris has all of the good things about Biden without the age.
Prove it was done. Prove that multiple original sources in the news media colluded to do that, and not just once, but on multiple occasions over the last three years. The burden of that proof is on you.Watch and learn how it's done.
You'll get your wish. Trump can win.Democrat fund raising has dried up. Trump had been way behind, no longer. Democrat volunteerism has dried up. Campaign offices across the country can’t get workers. Two thirds of party members think Biden is too old. Senior Democrats see a looming disaster if he stays on the ticket.
Pretty much. This is like Nixon and Watergate in terms of how it's playing out. This is what a successful Trump impeachment would have looked like.Democrat fund raising has dried up. Trump had been way behind, no longer. Democrat volunteerism has dried up. Campaign offices across the country can’t get workers. Two thirds of party members think Biden is too old. Senior Democrats see a looming disaster if he stays on the ticket.
Desh has a cult following......she's more popular than Saturday Night Live and Friday Night at Freddies combined.......LOL. You should argue that one out with Desh (Evince). She's convinced half of the universe sits and reads our lines of wit.
This isn't the Holt interview but look at her mouth in this video and tell me it can't be done.Prove it was done. Prove that multiple original sources in the news media colluded to do that, and not just once, but on multiple occasions over the last three years. The burden of that proof is on you.
Show how NBC's Lester Holt in a one-on-one interview with Harris would have allowed her answers and words to be modified. Go for it.
Hell, even radical Leftist magazine Vox cites her word salad verbatum.
Then came a widely derided interview with NBC News’ Lester Holt during that trip, in which she appeared to mock Holt’s question about why she hadn’t visited the southern border if she was working to try to stem the flow of migration north. “At some point, you know, we are going to the border,” Harris told Holt. “We’ve been to the border. So this whole thing about the border. We’ve been to the border. We’ve been to the border.”
When Holt pointed out that she hadn’t, she seemed to discount the question, replying that she hadn’t “been to Europe. And I mean, I don’t ... understand the point that you’re making. I’m not discounting the importance of the border.”
Kamala Harris and the border: The myth and the facts
Republicans are already on the prowl against Kamala Harris and her immigration record.www.vox.com
Are they part of this grand conspiracy too?