Christians are anti-science.

Why don't you make yours smaller like you were asked to a few weeks ago?? It is annoying.............
 
Michael_Panetta said:
I'm confident in appealing to the international scientific community. You can have your Bible nonsense.
Click to expand...

Science isn't a community. Science is a set of falsifiable theories. You don't believe in the Theory of Creation. Fine. You are free to choose your religion. You apparently believe in the Church of Abiogenesis and the Church of the Theory of Evolution.

Science has no theories about unobserved past events. They are not falsifiable.
 
Joe Hiden said:
Dumbasses always scream "LOGICAL FALLACY" when they can't answer straight forward questions. They think it makes them seems smart and gives them an out at the same time.

Unfortunately for you, I see through your bullshit.

None of what was claimed is provable via scientific method. But, hey if you want to believe in man made global warming be my guest. That is what makes you one of those "principled" conservatives or something
Click to expand...

Science isn't a 'method' or a 'procedure'. It has no proofs. Proofs only exist in closed functional systems like mathematics or logic. Science is an open functional system.

That said, science DOES have something to say about CO2's affect on the temperature of the Earth. CO2 is not capable of warming the Earth, and neither is any other gas or vapor. It is simply not possible to create energy out of nothing, and it is not possible to heat an already warmer surface using a colder gas.

The only way to make the Earth warmer is to increase the output of the Sun, or to bring Earth closer to the Sun. The laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law is pretty straightforward. You can't trap heat. You can't trap thermal energy. There is always heat. You can't trap light. You can't create energy out of nothing. You can't decrease entropy in any system.

The Church of Global Warming denies these theories of science. It also denies mathematics (namely, statistical and probability mathematics, as well as random number mathematics). This is a fundamentalist style religion. There is no convincing such people. They will deny everything to maintain their belief.
 
Michael_Panetta said:
God? What is a god? Please give a definition.
Click to expand...

God: noun. A being or intelligence capable of powers beyond that normally accepted as 'natural' (supernatural powers). Often credited with the ability to create and/or inhabit some natural object, such as the Sun, Earth, a tree, a rock, etc.
Different religions often have at least one god (but is not required to have any). All religions are based upon some initial circular argument, with arguments extending from that.

Examples: Jupiter, Apollo, Wotan, Gaia, Jesus Christ, Allah, Kaze, various forms of Shinto demons including those observed by some American indians, including those claiming to inhabit some most everyday objects such as money, crystals or other stones, liquids such as water or oil, or gaseous composites like air.

This is the definition I use. Perhaps you have a different one to offer?
 
IBDaMann said:
I have no doub that you are convinced that Biden will win. So why won't you tell me what excuse you have lined up for when Trump wins? I assure you, I fully accept your testimony that you cling with dear life to hope beyond hope that Biden will win ... but when Trump wins, how will you be able to justify not having seen it coming? No one's going to buy "Russian colluuuuuuuuuuuuuusion." No one's going to buy "Trump stole the mailboxes."

What will be your excuse?
Click to expand...

I wouldn't have an "excuse," because regular people aren't like you. But if he does win, it will only be with the electoral college again. There's no way he will win the popular vote.

But I'm confident he'll lose because Americans are fatigued by him.
 
Into the Night said:
Science isn't a community. Science is a set of falsifiable theories. You don't believe in the Theory of Creation. Fine. You are free to choose your religion. You apparently believe in the Church of Abiogenesis and the Church of the Theory of Evolution.

Science has no theories about unobserved past events. They are not falsifiable.
Click to expand...

You're retarded. Go away.
 
Into the Night said:
God: noun. A being or intelligence capable of powers beyond that normally accepted as 'natural' (supernatural powers). Often credited with the ability to create and/or inhabit some natural object, such as the Sun, Earth, a tree, a rock, etc.
Different religions often have at least one god (but is not required to have any). All religions are based upon some initial circular argument, with arguments extending from that.

Examples: Jupiter, Apollo, Wotan, Gaia, Jesus Christ, Allah, Kaze, various forms of Shinto demons including those observed by some American indians, including those claiming to inhabit some most everyday objects such as money, crystals or other stones, liquids such as water or oil, or gaseous composites like air.

This is the definition I use. Perhaps you have a different one to offer?
Click to expand...

You're missing the point of my criticism. "God" is such a nebulous term that it's essentially meaningless. One person's definition of "god" is as arbitrary as another's.
 
Into the Night said:
Better line up your post election therapist early. There's going to be a real shortage of them after the election.
Click to expand...

No matter how many lies Trump spouts at the debate on Tuesday, no matter how many childish attacks he launches or how many fits of rage he has when Biden bests him, you'll think he won the debate. And when he loses the election, you'll be convinced that it was due to cheating on some level.
 
IBDaMann said:
I don't want your money. I want you to change your signature block to the graphic I make for you ... for six weeks.

Bet?
Click to expand...

Translation: I know I'd lose that bet because I'm talking out of my ass.

Everyone already knows, INT/IBDa/gfm.

I prefer money.
 
Michael_Panetta said:
I wouldn't have an "excuse," because regular people aren't like you. But if he does win, it will only be with the electoral college again. There's no way he will win the popular vote.

But I'm confident he'll lose because Americans are fatigued by him.
Click to expand...

Yes. Trump will win because of the electoral college, and only because of the electoral college. The President is not elected by popular vote.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top