Yes, deep state neocon policies have steered America's role in the Middle East towards Saudi Arabia, blocking out Iran (a much more liberal and amiable nation than Saudi Arabia). How can you be both FOR non-intervention, ANTI-traditional policies, and PRO-arms deals that aid one side in a sectarian holy war? You hypocrite.
good lord your lack of knowledge is frightening .
Yes, deep state neocon policies have steered America's role in the Middle East
correct
sales to SA are not interventionism, nor do they have anything to do w/DeepState. These are long term policies -nothing "neocon" about them.
blocking out Iran (a much more liberal and amiable nation than Saudi Arabia).
I'd like nothing better then do deal w/Iran -but Iran wants no part of dealing with the USA!
Obama tried that, and Iran kicked him in the teeth, took the money for the Iran deal, yet aligns w/Russia
and will not deal with the USA in anyway.
All Obama did was set the Sunni states on edge with his non-alignment strategy.
Even against ISIS ( on the ground) Iran will not work with anything American. They run their own operations, and to the best of my knowledge they don't even inform us so we can "deconflict" like we do w/Russia in Syria
How can you be both FOR non-intervention, ANTI-traditional policies, and PRO-arms deals that aid one side in a sectarian holy war? You hypocrite.
we sell arms so SA can defend itself. SA does not use expeditionary forces ( unlike Iran).
Ideally we want the region to settle their own differences without US intervention.
Russia supplies Iran, or Iran has their own weapons (and for the most part they are sophisticated)-
so if anything we balance out the sales by supplying SA.
I can ASSURE YOU that SA is not going to not buy weapons.
So where do you think they will turn to? Just like Egypt did -to Russia