Evidence is overwhelming.

Jarod said:
I am starting to think a conviction is likely... I never like to predict a jury, but this testimony they are having read back... its harmful to the defense.
Click to expand...
and it contains contradictory testimony from Cohen......you know, the stuff where he lied to THIS jury.......who would that be harmful to.....
 
The Judge said the jury does not have to be unanimous on what the underlying crime is. The supreme court has already ruled that juries have to be unanimous on every element of the crime. That trial is a setup.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TOP
PostmodernProphet said:
and it contains contradictory testimony from Cohen......you know, the stuff where he lied to THIS jury.......who would that be harmful to.....
Click to expand...
Right, it appears they are looking for corroborate for the testimony of the liar.. and that corroborate is there from Pecker.
 
Jarod said:
I know, the court knows, the Grand Jury knows, the jurors know, and YOU KNOW. Playing dumb is not a good look for you.
Click to expand...
they don't know......they've been instructed to pick one.......remember when juries had to be unanimous on ALL the elements of the crimes.......lawyers remember......
 
ExpressLane said:
The Judge said the jury does not have to be unanimous on what the underlying crime is. The supreme court has already ruled that juries have to be unanimous on every element of the crime. That trial is a setup.
Click to expand...
This is complicated, so I see how you fooled by FOXNews or someone... The supreme court of NY has ruled that the underlying crime is an element of the crime, but only the existence of an underlying crime, not any specific crime. So they must be unanimous that there is an underlying crime, but they do not have to be unanimous as to what specific crime.
 
Jarod said:
Right, it appears they are looking for corroborate for the testimony of the liar.. and that corroborate is there from Pecker.
Click to expand...
Yep. By the looks of it, where they are asking for Pecker’s testimony, they may well have decided on it payment fraud and are now contemplating the conspiracy portion.
 
Jarod said:
This is complicated, so I see how you fooled by FOXNews or someone... The supreme court of NY has ruled that the underlying crime is an element of the crime, but only the existence of an underlying crime, not any specific crime. So they must be unanimous that there is an underlying crime, but they do not have to be unanimous as to what specific crime.
Click to expand...
You’re spinning your wheels, dude. They have no concept of the law and they don’t care, anyway.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
they don't know......they've been instructed to pick one.......remember when juries had to be unanimous on ALL the elements of the crimes.......lawyers remember......
Click to expand...
They cannot "pick" what crime Trump was charged with, you know that. He is charged with 34 counts of falsifying business records.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
they don't know......they've been instructed to pick one.......remember when juries had to be unanimous on ALL the elements of the crimes.......lawyers remember......
Click to expand...
They have not been instructed to pick what crime Trump has been charged with. You know that, you just lie.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top