Good News Sucks for Climate Cultists

[Into the Night]

Scientophobic rat droppings.

Haw, haw..............................haw.

'Scientophobic'??????? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

 

[Saint Guinefort]

Lie.

Not a lie. I can count. Maybe you can't. You seem to have a bit of self-control issues.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Not a lie. I can count. Maybe you can't. You seem to have a bit of self-control issues.

He seems as passionate in debunking your religion as you do in proselytizing.

 

[Into the Night]

Right, because "science" requires recitation of dogma, never questioning consensus.

You are correct here. Science does not use consensus. There is no voting bloc in science. No theory of science is 'dogma'. ANY theory of science may be falsified. It is not possible to prove any theory True.

Those who don't grasp chromosomes and the concept of gender and think carbon dioxide is a pollutant fancy themselves as "true followers of syanse.."

Again, well stated. These twits can't figure out what gender they are, can't define phrases like 'climate change' or even 'global warming', can't provide any data of Earth's temperature, figure that carbon dioxide has some magick capability to falsify the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law, figure that the sunlight surface of the space station (which often reads upwards to 250 deg F) and has no significant carbon dioxide there, is cooler than Earth, which has carbon dioxide.

These twits deny science.

So, since you are a dedicated Gaia cultist, why aren't you Russians deindustrializing to "save the planet?"

They don't want to save the planet (it doesn't need 'saving' anyway!). They want to implement tyranny. They themselves won't 'deindustrialize' because they consider themselves the 'elite'. It's Rules for Thee, Not for Me.

How much CO2 did you dump into the atmosphere with your invasion of Ukraine? A fuckload more than my air conditioner did.

I really don't care. CO2 can't harm the Earth.

Somehow I doubt you are sincere in caring about the planet...

The don't care about the planet. The planet is big enough to take care of itself anyway. They only care about the tyranny they want to implement.

War is coming. It will be a religious war...the worst kind. It will be started by the Democrats. Skirmishes have already broken out. Democrats are burning, looting, and pillaging cities, setting criminal elements loose upon them, and trying to shove their immorality down everyone's throat. They discard and deny the Constitution of the United States and all State constitutions.

People are tired of it. I see no future other than war breaking out, probably soon after the 2024 election (if there is one).

 

[Into the Night]

Not a lie. I can count. Maybe you can't. You seem to have a bit of self-control issues.

You can't seem to count or do math at all.
You're a liar. You even try to deny your own posts. You're an idiot. ANYONE can go and look at your posts.

 

[Saint Guinefort]

He seems as passionate in debunking your religion as you do in proselytizing.

LOL. You call his stuff "Debunking"? You realize he doesn't understand even the second law of thermo and his attempts at writing out the first law are hilarious! The guy is a buffoon.

But then you have a DSc right? LOLOL.

 

[Into the Night]

He seems as passionate in debunking your religion as you do in proselytizing.

Quite right. I consider the Church of Global Warming evil. It is being imposed as a state religion. It is fundamentalist in nature. It stems directly from the Church of Green. That in turn stems directly from the Church of Karl Marx.

It is tyrannical. It wants socialistic theft. It's all about the 'elite' and how they consider everyone else schmucks to condemn and make slaves of.

Make no mistake. The Democrats would bring back slavery if they could. They have not changed since the party was formed by Pres. Jackson. They have always been amoral. They have always been racist. They have always been bigots. They have always considered themselves 'elite'. They have always despised the Constitution of the United States and all State constitutions.

I despise Democrats and all their fundamentalist religions.

 

[Saint Guinefort]

You can't seem to count or do math at all.
You're a liar. You even try to deny your own posts. You're an idiot. ANYONE can go and look at your posts.

LOL. Why don't you show the class how you formulate the laws of thermo? Everyone needs a laugh now.

 

[Into the Night]

LOL. You call his stuff "Debunking"?

Yes.

You realize he doesn't understand even the second law of thermo

Inversion fallacy. You cannot heat a warmer surface using a colder gas. You cannot make heat flow backwards. You cannot reduce entropy for any reason. You cannot compare two systems as if they were the same system.

and his attempts at writing out the first law are hilarious!

Discard of the 1st law of thermodynamics.

You cannot create energy out of nothing.
You cannot trap heat.
You cannot trap light.
You cannot trap thermal energy. There is always heat.

No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth.

You deny and discard mathematics too, particularly statistical mathematics, probability mathematics, random number mathematics, and algebra.
It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth.
It is not possible to measure the global atmospheric concentration of CO2.
It is not possible to measure the total snow and ice on Earth.
It is not possible to measure the emissivity of Earth.
It is not possible to measure the storm activity on Earth or the total precipitation on Earth.
It is not possible to measure the pH of the oceans.

The guy is a buffoon.

.....annnnnnd the name calling.

But then you have a DSc right? LOLOL.

....annnnnd the belittlement.

Assumption of victory fallacy. Insult fallacies. Discard of science. Discard of mathematics. Redefinition fallacy (science<->religion).

 

[Into the Night]

LOL. Why don't you show the class how you formulate the laws of thermo? Everyone needs a laugh now.

RQAA

 

[Uncensored2008]

LOL. You call his stuff "Debunking"? You realize he doesn't understand even the second law of thermo and his attempts at writing out the first law are hilarious! The guy is a buffoon.

But then you have a DSc right? LOLOL.

Well, someone appears not to understand the basics....

There are actually several things I disagree with ITN on, but he is vastly more educated on this subject than you are.

But whatchagunnado?

 

[Saint Guinefort]

Well, someone appears not to understand the basics....

There are actually several things I disagree with ITN on, but he is vastly more educated on this subject than you are.

But whatchagunnado?

LOL. Yes sirree, DOCTOR. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.

 

[Saint Guinefort]

RQAA

Nah, don't be like that! Show us again! I laugh so hard when I see it.

C'mon!

 

[Uncensored2008]

LOL. Yes sirree, DOCTOR. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.

It's in my profile, but since you were too lazy to look, I have a doctorate in logistics, I'm a logistician. I was advised and mentored by the late, great Dr. Eli Goldratt - father of the Theory of Constraints. As part of a team, I co-wrote a published work on the mitigation of time fences in a complex system. If you are so inclined, you can find out who I am - down to 5 people at any rate.

And none of that matters; I have made no pretense to any special knowledge of meteorology - as ITN pointed out, "climatology" is a fabricated discipline crafted to promote a conclusion.

 

[Saint Guinefort]

It's in my profile, but since you were too lazy to look, I have a doctorate in logistics,

LOGISTICS??? As in SHipping and Receiving? Seriously? Wow.

I'm a logistician. I was advised and mentored by the late, great Dr. Eli Goldratt - father of the Theory of Constraints. As part of a team, I co-wrote a published work on the mitigation of time fences in a complex system. If you are so inclined, you can find out who I am - down to 5 people at any rate.

So you know NOTHING about climate or earth science. Got it.

And none of that matters; I have made no pretense to any special knowledge of meteorology - as ITN pointed out, "climatology" is a fabricated discipline crafted to promote a conclusion.

Well, YOU DID BRING IT UP. So, you know...clearly you don't really understand how language works. Maybe you must have missed the class that day in Logistics School. It was probably between the classes on "Tracking shipments with the UPS app" and "Unboxing".

Either way your degree is meaningless in this discussion. Sorry to break it to you.

 

[Bigdog]

When the Deniers have finished fencing with rolled-up data charts................the climate-change refugees are in deep shit;

Democrats despise the poor and uneducated.

 

[Bigdog]

Imbecile! Your solution is NOT to diminish the pollutants or the deforestation/urbanization, but to increase artificial fertilizer as a constant band-aid?

For your education:

Environmental Implications of Excess Fertilizer and Manure on Water Quality
(NM1281, Reviewed August 2022)

https://www.ndsu.edu/agriculture/ex...the depletion,through runoff and soil erosion.

And either you're just too willfully ignorant or a bad liar. From my link: "...On top of all that, Moore points out increased CO2 also benefits weeds that compete with farm plants.

" .... Rising CO2’s effect on crops could also harm human health. “We know unequivocally that when you grow food at elevated CO2 levels in fields, it becomes less nutritious,” notes Samuel Myers, principal research scientist in environmental health at Harvard University. “[Food crops] lose significant amounts of iron and zinc—and grains [also] lose protein.” Myers and other researchers have found atmospheric CO2 levels predicted for mid-century—around 550 parts per million—could make food crops lose enough of those key nutrients to cause a protein deficiency in an estimated 150 million people and a zinc deficit in an additional 150 million to 200 million. (Both of those figures are in addition to the number of people who already have such a shortfall.) A total of 1.4 billion women of child-bearing age and young children who live in countries with a high prevalence of anemia would lose more than 3.8 percent of their dietary iron at such CO2 levels, according to Meyers."

Anyone with a rational, objective mind who can read carefully comprehensively can easily see through your repetitive, myopic drivel. In addition, that you can't resist throwing in your obsessive racism as some sort of validation for your ignorance just confirms the erroneous basis of your screed.

You're the perfect Big Dumb Dog mascot for corporate flunkies, MAGA mooks and racist rabble. Carry on.

Farmers have tuned their current artificial fertilization practices to current CO2 levels. Of course they should increase fertilization if necessary.

The predictions are pure speculation based on a few poor experiments based on a lack of additional fertilization.

3.8% drop in iron. That's less than 1/25. You are grasping at straws.

Why Al Gorians think a Greenhouse Earth would be a desert or an ice ball is beyond absurd. The Earth has become 14% greener. That's not going to cause starvation. Banning fertilizer as you wish to do, will cause starvation.

 

[moon]

Right, because "science" requires recitation of dogma, never questioning consensus.

Those who don't grasp chromosomes and the concept of gender and think carbon dioxide is a pollutant fancy themselves as "true followers of syanse.."

So, since you are a dedicated Gaia cultist, why aren't you Russians deindustrializing to "save the planet?"

How much CO2 did you dump into the atmosphere with your invasion of Ukraine? A fuckload more than my air conditioner did.

Somehow I doubt you are sincere in caring about the planet...

I appreciate how you carefree capitalists need to fantasize your way through your daily fog .

 

[moon]

Buzzword fallacy. It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth.

Now issuing threats?

I always said Democrat morons would start the war.

Corporations still exist, moron. It is just one form of organizing a business. There is no 'era' here.
The worse what gets????

'Scientophobia'?????? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHA!

'Scientophobic'??????? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Yes. It's an aversion to lines of latitude.
You are a scientophobe.

Haw, haw, haw, haw, haw...............................haw, haw, haw........................haw, haw.........................haw.

 

[Into the Night]

Nah, don't be like that! Show us again! I laugh so hard when I see it.

C'mon!

RQAA