Right. Says the guy who can't tell the difference between some non-entity saying something kooky and a party platform. You've never had a problem with being incapable of conforming to reality, why should you try to do it here?You need to check yourself before your fingers hit the keys to produce these little condescending opinion laden diatribes, Damo....makes you look less foolish when compared to the on-going reality of life.
Again, you simply are too excited to play "gotcha" to understand the difference between a non-entity Congressman and a platform. And too foolish to understand that "apathy" about what they said means "support" of it.
Here folks, is what our intellectual coward Damo AVOIDS:
No shit, sherlock. And when the PARTY gives financial support to an individual candidate that spews hate filled rubbish, then the party is responsible....or you have a new definition for belonging to a political party? Case in point: Many people stopped voting for the Dem party because it refused to dump Joe Lieberman, and GOP'ers momentarily became "independents" in order TO vote for him. Are you going to deny this? Or are you going to try and BS around it?
Grow up, Damo....these cheesy little tricks of yours are painfully obvious in the chronology of the posts...and make you all the more foolish in your insipid stubborness.
Belonging to a political party means access to funding for your campaign, endorsements, etc. Like it or not, people are partisan, vote party loyalty, etc. Your original statement was WRONG. Deal with it.
I didn't address the "issue" I simply told you that I didn't care what those people had to say and that they aren't even close to "The Party"...Bottom line: You and every other dopey ass neocon clown spent DAYS avoiding the opening post's information regarding the the subject title of this thread. And when YOU finally address the issue, YOU make an assertion that is illogical and untrue AS DETERMINED BY MATTERS OF HISTORY AND FACT VIA THE PUBLIC RECORD, as I explained.
Your response...avoid that and try to promote some bogus accusation for me to respond to, as if that would remove your blunder.
It won't, Damo...it's a printed medium. So unless you're going to start removing or editing posts, this childish dodge of yours is just wasting space. You did EXACTLY as I said, you DENY recent history to try and BS around the FACT that you are Wrong.
I guess the GOP's true feelings are coming out folks, it Damo's "defense" is their excuse.
Bottom line: You and every other dopey ass neocon clown spent DAYS avoiding the opening post's information regarding the the subject title of this thread. And when YOU finally address the issue, YOU make an assertion that is illogical and untrue AS DETERMINED BY MATTERS OF HISTORY AND FACT VIA THE PUBLIC RECORD, as I explained.
Your response...avoid that and try to promote some bogus accusation for me to respond to, as if that would remove your blunder.
It won't, Damo...it's a printed medium. So unless you're going to start removing or editing posts, this childish dodge of yours is just wasting space. You did EXACTLY as I said, you DENY recent history to try and BS around the FACT that you are Wrong.
I guess the GOP's true feelings are coming out folks, it Damo's "defense" is their excuse.
Again, I reject the premise of TaiChiLibTard's every argument: the "neocon" bogeyman.I just reread this thread, not one response to the actual links in the first post.
Par for the course, yet these maroons constantly whine about ad homs.
Here folks, is what our intellectual coward Damo AVOIDS:
No shit, sherlock. And when the PARTY gives financial support to an individual candidate that spews hate filled rubbish, then the party is responsible....or you have a new definition for belonging to a political party? Case in point: Many people stopped voting for the Dem party because it refused to dump Joe Lieberman, and GOP'ers momentarily became "independents" in order TO vote for him. Are you going to deny this? Or are you going to try and BS around it?
Grow up, Damo....these cheesy little tricks of yours are painfully obvious in the chronology of the posts...and make you all the more foolish in your insipid stubborness.
Belonging to a political party means access to funding for your campaign, endorsements, etc. Like it or not, people are partisan, vote party loyalty, etc. Your original statement was WRONG. Deal with it.
That's not the basis of my arguments about liberals.
Hence they seize on the far more directly connected word of "progressive"...
I just reread this thread, not one response to the actual links in the first post.
Par for the course, yet these maroons constantly whine about ad homs.