Sure. Record high stock market, record low unemployment, peace, prosperity.
Horrible shit.
America is not the stock market. America is an ideal, and you no longer believe in that ideal.
Sure. Record high stock market, record low unemployment, peace, prosperity.
Horrible shit.
"Too"?
Maybe you missed the news: Flynn was always innocent.
The fact that they threatened to railroad his son as well should horrify any American.
Sure. Record high stock market, record low unemployment, peace, prosperity.
Horrible shit.
Working out effective and mutually satisfactory solutions to national problems is the purpose of a healthy government.
I agree, but you can't do that when half of the participants refuse to acknowledge that you legitimately won an election.
So it all comes back to that. We can't compromise with people who think that government is illegitimate. So I'm interested to know how you think we can.
How would you unite with people who insurrected against your election victory?
Why would someone who doesn't think you are legit compromise with you?
Wow. So you think over 70 million Americans insurrected? Who knew?!
Do you know why?
Wow. So you think over 70 million Americans insurrected? Who knew?!
The Republicans in Congress, who represent those people, rejected the certification of the Electoral College, rejected the articles of Impeachment for inciting the insurrection, and rejected the Constitutionality of impeaching for inciting the insurrection.
So how do you compromise with that?
Sooooo, no compromise. Cool!
Look, you are the one saying we must compromise, and I'm asking you how we do that with people who don't think that Democrats are legitimately elected?
You have no answer.
So like always, you got nothing.
So again, this whole "compromise" thing seems to be another trip down egocentric lane with you...
It's so easy to posture that you support compromise while not offering any logical or reasonable way to do that.
It seems like you're just falling back on the ambiguity of compromise because, like always, you haven't really given this any serious thought.
Yes, but you just said there'd be no compromise
It takes two to Tango. Both have to compromise. If one side doesn't, and you just wrote the Democrats won't, then there's no compromise.Why do the Democrats need to compromise with the Republicans, who have no leverage other than attempted and ultimately unsuccessful violent insurrection?
It takes two to Tango. Both have to compromise. If one side doesn't, and you just wrote the Democrats won't, then there's no compromise.
But you've never explained how to compromise with people who don't view your election wins as legitimate.
This appears to be the Dutch Uncle Plan for Compromise:
Step 1: One side refuses to accept the legitimacy of the other
Step 2: ?????
Step 3: Compromise
So Dutch, what is Step 2? I'm genuinely interested to know how you get to Step 3 here without addressing Step 1.
Not my fucking job
So you come here and demand that Democrats compromise, but you offer no plan, no insight, no advice on how to do that, choosing instead to just ambiguously refer to compromise as the goal so as to avoid doing any work or giving it any serious thought.
So it's someone's else problem to figure out the thing you are demanding of everyone.
Lazy.