How To Explain Gay Rights To An Idiot

Onceler said:
You don't know shite about why marriage was instituted originally. You've never studied it, or read more than a blurb about it.

You're just a stupid bigot.
Click to expand...


Originally ?....No, and neither do you....I said we go by the earliest recorded history and note the reasons WHY marriage was instituted.....

You...on the other hand, seem to want to consider and study LEGEND.....and you have the balls to say I don't know shit.....

If thats the case, you know less than shit about the subject....you're a pinhead, an idiot and a moron all rolled up into one exceptionally stupid person....
 
Last edited:
DamnYankee said:
The lefties are trying to steer this into the religions realm, so they can then cite separation of church and state. Once gay marriage is legal then the lefties will drop the church-state stance and force religion to recognize it and perform the ceremonies.

My argument is that the institution of marriage benefits society and that the legal union between a man and his woman is therefore sanctioned by the state.
Click to expand...

No one argument, within this thread, has implied or suggested that religions would be forced to recognize and/or preform the ceremony.

While this may be a fear of yours and those that think like you do, there is nothing to support your paranoia.
 
bravo said:
Originally ?....No, and neither do you....I said we go by the earliest recorded history and note the reasons WHY marriage was instituted.....

You...on the other hand, seem to want to consider and study LEGEND.....and you have the balls to say I don't know shit.....

If thats the case, you know less than shit about the subject....you're a pinhead, an idiot and a moron all rolled up into one exceptionally stupid person....
Click to expand...

You don't know shit. You even know less shit than you thought that you knew. You know less than shit. You are shit. Shitter.
 
DamnYankee said:
That's not the point. If you can't prove a net benefit to society, then there is no reason to make a dramatic change, unless of course the goal is progressivism.
Click to expand...

I read the Supreme Courts ruling, regarding different races to marry, and I saw no mention of any "net benefit to society" and yet, there was a dramatic change made and guess what?
Society survived, improved, and grew stronger.
 
DamnYankee said:
States have their own Constitutions and they regulate marriage. Mine says that its between one man and one woman.

Homosexuality is a deviant behavior, while heterosexual relations are required in order for society to survive.
Click to expand...

NO ONE IS TRYING TO PUT AN END TO HETEROSEXUAL RELATIONSHIPS.
Why do you keep throwing out this, as a strawman?
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
NO ONE IS TRYING TO PUT AN END TO HETEROSEXUAL RELATIONSHIPS.
Why do you keep throwing out this, as a strawman?
Click to expand...

No one should be trying to put an end to homosexual realtionships.......
Why do you keep implying this lie ?

We just refuse to legitimize that deviate conduct by allowing it to be called 'marriage'.....
 
bravo said:
No one should be trying to put an end to homosexual realtionships.......
Why do you keep implying this lie ?

We just refuse to legitimize that deviate conduct by allowing it to be called 'marriage'.....
Click to expand...

First of all i think you meant deviant and second of all, what?
You can call homosexuality an abomination as many times as you'd like but that really won't change that it's here to stay, refusing to allow gay marriage actually delegitimizes the entire structure, by having people in, "permanent partnerships" who aren't married and get to avoid all that trouble with lawyers when it all falls apart. Give up stop throwing things at them and then maybe they won't need to have so many parades.
 
DamnYankee said:
States have their own Constitutions and they regulate marriage. Mine says that its between one man and one woman.

Homosexuality is a deviant behavior, while heterosexual relations are required in order for society to survive.
Click to expand...

USFREEDOM911 said:
NO ONE IS TRYING TO PUT AN END TO HETEROSEXUAL RELATIONSHIPS.
Why do you keep throwing out this, as a strawman?
Click to expand...

bravo said:
No one should be trying to put an end to homosexual realtionships.......
Why do you keep implying this lie ?

We just refuse to legitimize that deviate conduct by allowing it to be called 'marriage'.....
Click to expand...

It does appear, from the number of posts, that certain heterosexuals believe that if gay marriges are recognized that it will bring an end to heterosexual marriages.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
No one argument, within this thread, has implied or suggested that religions would be forced to recognize and/or preform the ceremony.

While this may be a fear of yours and those that think like you do, there is nothing to support your paranoia.
Click to expand...
Gays are doing it through the back door:
No house of worship should be required to perform a same-sex marriage ceremony (or indeed any ceremony it doesn’t want to perform). But taxpayer-funded agencies – including “faith-based” providers – should treat everyone equally. Otherwise qualified same-sex couples should have the same access to public services as opposite-sex couples. Churches that don’t want to obey non-discrimination rules are free to stop participating in publicly funded adoption programs.
Click to expand...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...on-gay-marriage/2011/06/22/AGAxTkfH_blog.html
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top