It Begins: Journalists start admitting Trump-Russia conspiracy was a fabricated lie

kudzu said:
So if Trump really is a criminal traitor, you don't want to know???
Click to expand...

I don't think that's what he's saying. If this does turn out to be something other than Democrats projecting their own trademark disloyalty and treason onto their opponents, no one is going to believe it from a discredited liar.
 
Darth Beto Omar said:
Even if it turns out Trump is a criminal—he is hardly alone.

You don’t care that crimes were committed in the origin of the Russian investigation??
Click to expand...

Exactly. The person changing the subject at every turn is the one who needs to be answering the questions about whether or not they care about exposing the crimes that have been committed.
 
Getin the ring said:
unfortunately this "investigation" and all of it's fabricated origin will leave a stain on the FBI, and all of it's associated departments. That we really need to have some sort of belief in it's credibility.

And all because it was "Hillary's Turn" and it didn't look like it was going to work out that way
Click to expand...

thumbnail
 
Arminius said:
Yahoo News’ Michael Isikoff (formerly of Newsweek and NBC News) has reversed course and started acknowledging that the left's projection of its own disloyalty and collusion with foreign powers against this country's interests, on vivid display in the Trump-Russia hoax, has been exhaustively investigated, that there is zero evidence of anyone but Democrats colluding with Russia or rigging elections, and that all the key pillars of this astonishingly dishonest scam are "likely false." He won't be the last to be forced to admit that Democrats invented the entire thing, just like they did with Roy Moore.

Dossier fails the test of time; Trump-Russia collusion claims now called 'likely false'



See also:

Woodward: No Evidence Of Trump-Russia Collusion, I Searched For Two Years

Dossier's 10 core collusion accusations remain unverified 20 months later
Click to expand...

NO ONE has come up with ANY false details, misstatements or inaccuracies in the DOSSIER. Everything we know that is in the dossier, TO DATE, has been corroborated in various ways by numerous sources. With one exception and no one knows (although I'LL BET MUELLER DOES) whether anyone peed on Trump or he simply watched and/or paid for WOMEN TO PEE on each other.

(I can't believe I just typed 'that' out loud)
 
reagansghost said:
such a shame nothing in the Steele Dossier has been disproved

too funny!
Click to expand...

:bs:

This is an "ad ignorantium" fallacy (you can't disprove my evidence-free two-year smear campaign, therefore it must be true). The burden is on the accuser.

Try again.


Woodward: No Evidence Of Trump-Russia Collusion, I Searched For Two Years

Dossier's 10 core collusion accusations remain unverified 20 months later

reagansghost said:
lol.....how is ANYTHING unverifiable?

wtf?
Click to expand...

How often do you beat your wife? <=== Unverifiable accusation.
 
Granule said:
Trying to connect Trump to Russia is a waste of time & tax payer dollars, and you dumbfucks will learn that when America votes you idiots back into the minority.
Click to expand...

The ironic thing us she claims to be a conservative yet consistently spouts progressive liberal platitudes.
 
noise said:
It's illegal to do so for a FISA warrant
Click to expand...

But crimes don't affect Democrats because they own the DOJ. Aren't you glad the Chicago thug ACORN president spent 8 years corrupting and politicizing every government institution to rig everything for Democrats?

thumbnail
 
Centerleftfl said:
NO ONE has come up with ANY false details, misstatements or inaccuracies in the DOSSIER. Everything we know that is in the dossier, TO DATE, has been corroborated in various ways by numerous sources. With one exception and no one knows (although I'LL BET MUELLER DOES) whether anyone peed on Trump or he simply watched and/or paid for WOMEN TO PEE on each other.

(I can't believe I just typed 'that' out loud)
Click to expand...

lol......none of it has been shown to be true......
 
Tranquillus in Exile said:
You are referring, at several removes, to the interview Isikoff gave to Ziegler earlier this month ...

Michael Isikoff, the chief investigative correspondent for Yahoo News, said Saturday during an interview on conservative commentator John Ziegler's "Free Speech Broadcasting" podcast that "Steele was clearly onto something" in his probe into the campaign's Russian connection but evidence has not surfaced to support some of his specific assertions.

Steele was correct to suspect "that there was a major Kremlin effort to interfere in our elections, that they were trying to help Trump's campaign, and that there were multiple contacts between various Russian figures close to the government and various people in the Trump campaign," Isikoff said.

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/12/18/steele-dossier-michael-isikoff/2347833002/


Please point out where Isikoff made ANY of the "admissions" you claimed:

"the left's disloyalty and collusion with foreign powers"

"Democrats colluding with Russia"

"all the key pillars are likely false"

"Democrats invented the entire thing"

????
Click to expand...

It should be really obvious that I was wording it in my own way. The actual quotes and link to the article were included to make this clear.
 
Arminius said:
:bs:

This is an "ad ignorantium" fallacy (you can't disprove my evidence-free two-year smear campaign, therefore it must be true). The burden is on the accuser.

Try again.


Woodward: No Evidence Of Trump-Russia Collusion, I Searched For Two Years

Dossier's 10 core collusion accusations remain unverified 20 months later



How often do you beat your wife? <=== Unverifiable accusation.
Click to expand...

Claim: Elvis is camped out on the dark side of the Moon.

Unverifiable. Even though it’s not a false statement it can’t be proven or disproven. Lefties have been played by the Russians.
 
Centerleftfl said:
NO ONE has come up with ANY false details, misstatements or inaccuracies in the DOSSIER. Everything we know that is in the dossier, TO DATE, has been corroborated in various ways by numerous sources. With one exception and no one knows (although I'LL BET MUELLER DOES) whether anyone peed on Trump or he simply watched and/or paid for WOMEN TO PEE on each other.

(I can't believe I just typed 'that' out loud)
Click to expand...

:rofl2:

Translation: It doesn't matter if all the evidence presented shows the opposite. I know it's true because I keep telling me.

thumbnail


Newsflash: Wanting things to be true doesn't make them true.

Golden shower? Trump dossier authors doubt their most explosive allegation

But now there is new reporting to suggest the dossier's creators had serious doubts about the veracity of the "golden showers" story from the very beginning. Despite those doubts, dossier author Christopher Steele included the "golden showers" account in his collection of anti-Trump intelligence, and the dubious charges set off a series of events that changed the course of the Trump-Russia investigation.
Click to expand...

"Facts are stubborn things." -John Adams
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top