It sure looks like the overlords are bringing mandatory masking back

America said:
You can always tell how far to the right someone is by how many stickers they have. Online, you guys have tons of idiotic graphics. In real life, you're the sort who speeds through town in a diesel truck covered in Trump/MAGA/pseudo-patriotic bumper stickers.

Your images take up more space that your actual response, and due to the way my phone formats stuff here, I have to zoom in all the way to see the tiny print of your response. Frankly, I don't see why I should zoom in, seeing as you're an anti-science, religious, Trump-loving lunatic who can't even grasp the concept of scientific consensus.
Click to expand...
Sybil is a psycho. His manifesto explains it all: https://politiplex.freeforums.net/board/19/debunking-signature
 
America said:
You don't know what scientific consensus is. You're attacking a strawman. Scientists don't ”vote” on anything.

If your doctor tells you that you have stomach cancer, you might seek a second opinion. Doctor #2 independently looks at your body and comes to the same diagnosis. The next eight doctors to examine you each independently reach the same diagnosis.

That's scientific consensus.
Click to expand...
How is your attempted description of "scientific consensus" any different than 'consensus'?

America said:
The doctors don't gather and “vote” about your diagnosis.
Click to expand...
Actually, that happens fairly regularly.

America said:
How can you not know what scientific consensus is? Did you drop out of the third grade?
Click to expand...
Apparently you don't know what "scientific consensus" is either (nobody does; it is a meaningless buzzword), as you've instead described an instance of a 'consensus' (amongst a handful of doctors about a medical diagnosis). Nothing that you described involved science in any way.
 
Last edited:
gfm7175 said:
How is your attempted description of "scientific consensus" any different than 'consensus'?

Actually, that happens fairly regularly.

Apparently you don't know what "scientific consensus" is either, as you've instead described an instance of a 'consensus' (amongst a handful of doctors about a medical diagnosis). Nothing that you described involved science in any way.
Click to expand...
Mantra 44 Pulling nonsensical conclusions out of your ass.

Into the Night said:
Mantra 1a.
Click to expand...
gfm7175 said:
Mantra 4a.
Click to expand...
IBDaMann said:
One of the "miscellaneous" documents on that site is Into the Night's mantra list.
Click to expand...
 
Nordberg said:
Rightys are so crazy.
Click to expand...
Ahhhhhh yup.... them damn rightys... what looners.... wanting a secure border (to deter illegal immigration, child trafficking, etc), freedom to make one's own healthcare decisions, freedom to defend oneself and one's family and property from harm, legitimately conducted elections, lower taxes, an economy fueled by feasible fuels instead of unreliable fuels, law and order instead of lawlessness and chaos, etc etc... What nutters them rightys are.... :laugh: :laugh:

Nordberg said:
The last thing Biden wants is another round of Covid.
Click to expand...
Biden isn't in a healthy enough mental state to know what he wants. He simply (and usually failing at) tries to do whatever his handlers tell him to do.

Nordberg said:
The problems it causes are terrible.
Click to expand...
Not really...

A sniffle... a cough... some fatigue... eerily similar to influenza in terms of symptoms...

The problems that another round of COVID mandates would cause would indeed be quite terrible though. Plenty of people lost their livelihoods the first (and hopefully only) time around...

Nordberg said:
He cannot please everyone, no matter what he does.
Click to expand...
Not even Jesus Christ himself can please everyone. It's a goal that can't be accomplished, even if not doing an insanely destructive thing such as implementing another round of COVID lockdowns.

Nordberg said:
The best scenario for him, is that Covid faded away forever.
Click to expand...
Democrats WANT fear mongering over COVID. They WANT chaos and destruction.

Nordberg said:
But it does not work that way.
Click to expand...
Right. Democrats WANT fear mongering over COVID. They WANT chaos and destruction.

Nordberg said:
Hawkeye does not spend much time thinking things through. He just burps another stupid thread that makes no sense.
Click to expand...
He does a lot more thinking than you've ever done.

Nordberg said:
Biden does not want covid.
Click to expand...
His handlers keep telling him to call for COVID lockdowns though...

Nordberg said:
He does not want mask mandates.
Click to expand...
Yes he does. Biden wants mask wearing to be mandated on a national level (just for the plebs, of course), but that darn pesky constitution stands in his way as there are a number of courts which still recognize its existence when issuing rulings.

Nordberg said:
He does not want vaccine lines again.
Click to expand...
Yes he does. Biden wants COVID jabs to be mandated on a national level (just for the plebs, of course), but that darn pesky constitution stands in his way as there are a number of courts which still recognize its existence when issuing rulings.

Nordberg said:
Lots of rightys are praying for its return.
Click to expand...
COVID can't "return" because COVID has never left since becoming a thing. It is leftists who want the COVID hysteria to return.

Nordberg said:
It will cause problems for the incumbent.
Click to expand...
Yup. Dems might yet push him to the wayside for 2024... Stay tuned.
 
Last edited:
IBDaMann said:
[removed most of your mocking of America to make the post shorter]

You are totally fucking stupid. Wait, let me guess, you believe in Global Warming, right? I bet you think people have used satellites to measure the earth's average global temperature to within one degree Celsius, yes? I bet you think the ocean is somehow rising, that Greenland ice is somehow disappearing and that the ocean is acidifying, right?

But you're not totally gullible, right? Not you. Too funny.
Click to expand...
America deserves every bit of your mocking of him and then some. Always an entertaining read whenever you "dial it up".
 
gfm7175 said:
How is your attempted description of "scientific consensus" any different than 'consensus'?


Actually, that happens fairly regularly.


Apparently you don't know what "scientific consensus" is either (nobody does; it is a meaningless buzzword), as you've instead described an instance of a 'consensus' (amongst a handful of doctors about a medical diagnosis). Nothing that you described involved science in any way.
Click to expand...

It must be tedious having a worldview that requires constant mental gymnastics to support.

Again:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_consensus
 
America said:
You can always tell how far to the right someone is by how many stickers they have. Online, you guys have tons of idiotic graphics. In real life, you're the sort who speeds through town in a diesel truck covered in Trump/MAGA/pseudo-patriotic bumper stickers.

Your images take up more space that your actual response, and due to the way my phone formats stuff here, I have to zoom in all the way to see the tiny print of your response. Frankly, I don't see why I should zoom in, seeing as you're an anti-science, religious, Trump-loving lunatic who can't even grasp the concept of scientific consensus.
Click to expand...

Does it take stickers to be conservative? I thought it just took a red hat with MAGA on it.
There is no such thing as 'scientific consensus', dope. Science has no voting bloc. Science has no politics.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top