JOIN THE MARINES...Meet exciting and unusual people AND KILL THEM

Grind said:
well it's semi because we always seem to be getting back together. but im not cheating on her, and yes, she knows Im dating other people.
Click to expand...

besides the one from a few weeks ago, that doesn't seem that into you, who else RU dating?
 
And the US under Reagan and Bush I officailly took a no comment stance on Iraqs use of chemical weapons. But it became an issue under Bush II ???

You Republicans gave up your right to whine about that already anyway.
 
LadyT said:
Once again. You're the one CLAIMING Iraq was unstable prior to the invasion. Prior the invasion as far as I know they had a stable secular society that was essentially al queada free. Now they are lucky if htey have electricity.

But don't think too hard about it. I understand. You don't have any because there is none and infact most humanitary agencies conclude that life for most Iraqis was infact better under Saddam than it is now.
Click to expand...

No, YOU are CLAIMING it was stable. I am ASKING you to show the reports that suggest it was stable in 2003. You said you had seen them. WHERE????
 
here is the thing t...

short term we get along great, so we've always been able to get back together and not think about important things for a while...

but then the big issues always come up and so we break up. long term it's just not a good idea. this is about the 7th or 8th breakup and I think it's for good this time.
 
uscitizen said:
And the US under Reagan and Bush I officailly took a no comment stance on Iraqs use of chemical weapons. But it became an issue under Bush II ???

You Republicans gave up your right to whine about that already anyway.
Click to expand...

really we did?
 
uscitizen said:
And the US under Reagan and Bush I officailly took a no comment stance on Iraqs use of chemical weapons. But it became an issue under Bush II ???

You Republicans gave up your right to whine about that already anyway.
Click to expand...

you still haven't explained how we would be helping the Iraqi's you say we are responsible for by leaving.
 
LadyT said:
besides the one from a few weeks ago, that doesn't seem that into you, who else RU dating?
Click to expand...

Ok I've known this girl for a while I'm pretty confident I could get another date, but I don't do the every week thing... I don't know it's just how I am.

There is another girl amy I kinda like.. but haven't done anything about yet. That's about it for now.
 
cawacko said:
you still haven't explained how we would be helping the Iraqi's you say we are responsible for by leaving.
Click to expand...

as I said you have to know when to hold em and know when to fold and walk away.
But some are too stupid to know the difference.
 
Superfreak said:
No, YOU are CLAIMING it was stable. I am ASKING you to show the reports that suggest it was stable in 2003. You said you had seen them. WHERE????
Click to expand...

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16035086/
Annan: Life for Iraqis worse than with Saddam
‘They had a dictator who was brutal but they had their streets,’ he says


http://www.haleakalatimes.com/story1986.aspx
Life in Iraq is worse now than under Saddam, Iraqi woman tells MCC students....“At least it was safe then,” said Khamas. “There’s a complete absence of security now.”


http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2006/10/25/iraq-failure.html
The war in Iraq is a "pure failure" that has left Iraqis in a worse state than when they lived under Saddam Hussein, former United Nations chief weapons inspector Hans Blix said in comments published Wednesday.


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1086691/posts
Sen. Hillary Clinton said this week that Iraqi women were better off under Saddam Hussein, arguing that when the brutal dictator ran the country women were at least assured the right to participate in Iraq's public life.
 
uscitizen said:
as I said you have to know when to hold em and know when to fold and walk away.
But some are too stupid to know the difference.
Click to expand...

Ok, so the article posted shows that violence escalated after the Brits left but anyone who uses that as an example is stupid?

And how does folding them protect the Iraqi people we are responsible for?
 
Grind said:
Ok I've known this girl for a while I'm pretty confident I could get another date, but I don't do the every week thing... I don't know it's just how I am.

There is another girl amy I kinda like.. but haven't done anything about yet. That's about it for now.
Click to expand...

Hmmmm, seems like people need a break from you after getting long doses. Does this help or hurt your self esteem?
 
LadyT, anything more current? All of those stories are more than a year old (one is about 4 years old). Things have changed in the past year.
 
LadyT said:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16035086/
Annan: Life for Iraqis worse than with Saddam
‘They had a dictator who was brutal but they had their streets,’ he says


http://www.haleakalatimes.com/story1986.aspx
Life in Iraq is worse now than under Saddam, Iraqi woman tells MCC students....“At least it was safe then,” said Khamas. “There’s a complete absence of security now.”


http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2006/10/25/iraq-failure.html
The war in Iraq is a "pure failure" that has left Iraqis in a worse state than when they lived under Saddam Hussein, former United Nations chief weapons inspector Hans Blix said in comments published Wednesday.


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1086691/posts
Sen. Hillary Clinton said this week that Iraqi women were better off under Saddam Hussein, arguing that when the brutal dictator ran the country women were at least assured the right to participate in Iraq's public life.
Click to expand...

Woman had rights under Saddam, and the government was secular. Even if the region ever becomes stable again they'll never have those rights back under religious government.
 
cawacko said:
Ok, so the article posted shows that violence escalated after the Brits left but anyone who uses that as an example is stupid?

And how does folding them protect the Iraqi people we are responsible for?
Click to expand...

As I said before just like we did in nam Wacko.

It is likely that Iraq will find stability sooner without us there than with us.

I was right about not invading so why am I not right now. You have been wrong all along.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top