I give up. How many?How many people did Stalin kill? Pol Pot? Mao?
I give up. How many?How many people did Stalin kill? Pol Pot? Mao?
A number that makes Hitler look like a choir boy. Apparently they needed someone to tell them killing people was wrong. You are the product of a civilization so saturated in christian teaching that you think everyone else automatically know it.I give up. How many?
I'm Buddhist so those parts aren't applicable...Don't worship any god but the god of the jews and christians
We are talking about Louisiana, not you.I'm Buddhist so those parts aren't applicable...
Hard to tell, since you, like Biden, rarely make complete sentences or any sense...We are talking about Louisiana, not you.
Then don't read my posts. No loss.Hard to tell, since you, like Biden, rarely make complete sentences or any sense...
Stalin = between 15 and 25 millionI give up. How many?
So what is the point? What, if you can help me with this, is Yakuda's point?Stalin = between 15 and 25 million
Mao = between 30 and 100 million
Pol Pot = about 3 million (but he was an amateur)
Hitler managed somewhere between 6 and 11 million.
I suppose he's pointing out that Hitler wasn't the worst dictator in history, which is true on a number of levels. I think that title goes to Mao with Stalin being in second place. Hitler comes in a distant third.So what is the point? What, if you can help me with this, is Yakuda's point?
Ok, thanks. But that has absolutely nothing to do with why he addressed it to me. I have never said anything about how many Hitler, Stalin or anyone else killed.I suppose he's pointing out that Hitler wasn't the worst dictator in history, which is true on a number of levels. I think that title goes to Mao with Stalin being in second place. Hitler comes in a distant third.
I can agree to that.Ok, thanks. But that has absolutely nothing to do with why he addressed it to me. I have never said anything about how many Hitler, Stalin or anyone else killed.
All I said that anyone who needed a GOD to tell them that killing people is wrong...is a psychopath.
Except, pally boy, the part that the “Christians” want are the first few.I get that, but that list can be non-religious and still work...
Don't murder people
Don't take what isn't yours
Don't commit adultery
Don't do X
Don't do Y
It does not violate the 1st amendment. The 1st amendment does not apply to the States, and the Ten Commandments is not a religion.So it violates the First Amendment. You claim to support the Constitution.
No, he isn't. You don't get to speak for the dead. He is making fun of the leftists.Oh look! T.A. is making fun of the Founding Fathers.
The Supreme Court does not have authority to change the Constitution. This ruling can be ignored.Thou Shalt Not Post the Ten Commandments in the Classroom
On Saturday he told attendees at a Republican fund-raiser, “I can’t wait to be sued.” Clearly, he knows that the Supreme Court previously ruled against mandatory displays of the Ten Commandments in the classroom. In a 1980 case, Stone v. Graham, the Supreme Court struck down a Kentucky law that required the posting of the Ten Commandments.
But Landry’s comments didn’t stop with bravado. He also said something else interesting. “If you want to respect the rule of law,” he told the guests, “you’ve got to start from the original lawgiver, which was Moses.” To teach respect for the rule of law, he’s defying the Supreme Court? That’s an interesting message to send to students.
Opinion | Thou Shalt Not Post the Ten Commandments in the Classroom
Documents do not radiate powers of personal virtue.www.nytimes.com
The Supreme Court is not law. It is a court.Thou Shalt Not Post the Ten Commandments in the Classroom
On Saturday he told attendees at a Republican fund-raiser, “I can’t wait to be sued.” Clearly, he knows that the Supreme Court previously ruled against mandatory displays of the Ten Commandments in the classroom. In a 1980 case, Stone v. Graham, the Supreme Court struck down a Kentucky law that required the posting of the Ten Commandments.
But Landry’s comments didn’t stop with bravado. He also said something else interesting. “If you want to respect the rule of law,” he told the guests, “you’ve got to start from the original lawgiver, which was Moses.” To teach respect for the rule of law, he’s defying the Supreme Court? That’s an interesting message to send to students.
Opinion | Thou Shalt Not Post the Ten Commandments in the Classroom
Documents do not radiate powers of personal virtue.www.nytimes.com
So?Except, pally boy, the part that the “Christians” want are the first few.
The Ten Commandments is not a theocracy.I don't see anyone doing that. It's your imagination due to your hatred of the Left.
My point still stands. If the Founding Father's expressed concern, you'd post that meme. They fought to be independent from the Roman Catholic Church rule.
The Supreme Court is not the Constitution, Sybil. They do not have any authority to change the Constitution. No court has any authority to change the Constitution.First amendment does apply to States, and that is settled case law.