Yes you certainly have, THEN the DNC marching orders came out to stop attacking Huckabee and by some giant coincidence you then stopped.
THAT was what made it so blatant.
McCain's surge
- Thread starter WRL
- Start date
THAT was what made it so blatant.
Excellent detective work there, Inspector Dano.
I must have not posted about huckabee in the last 48 hours, because the DNC ordered me not too.
Well, Huckabee is THE frontrunner now, the frontrunner is usually the target of the other side (as Repubs go after Hillary even though they have the best chance of beating her).
But I did like your lame attempt at making fun of Hucklebee's name to try and make it look like you lefties are actually still attacking him. It wasn't transparent at all...
I've already guaranteed that, in my mind at least. I don't think there is any way they can win. The only way it will be close is if Hillary is nominated by the democratic side.
I appreciate the rhetorical nature of your question, and the excellent faux bewilderment you express in asking the query. Well done!
Of course you know perfectly well what the answer is: Virtually all the rightwingers on this board profess to support Ron Paul. No con here is claiming to support Huckabee/Rudy/Thompson/Romney. So of course, Ron Paul is going to get lit up by liberals on the board. Enjoy! It’s all part of the fun of message boards!
Socrtease
Verified User
Here is a brief blub out of the National Review's endorsement of Romney:
Uniting the conservative coalition is not enough to win a presidential election, but it is a prerequisite for building on that coalition. Rudolph Giuliani did extraordinary work as mayor of New York and was inspirational on 9/11. But he and Mike Huckabee would pull apart the coalition from opposite ends: Giuliani alienating the social conservatives, and Huckabee the economic (and foreign-policy) conservatives. A Republican party that abandoned either limited government or moral standards would be much diminished in the service it could give the country.
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YmMxYTUyYzA1YTk2YzE5NGVmNjc0OGFjYWJmNzMzNjI=&p=1#more
Uniting the conservative coalition is not enough to win a presidential election, but it is a prerequisite for building on that coalition. Rudolph Giuliani did extraordinary work as mayor of New York and was inspirational on 9/11. But he and Mike Huckabee would pull apart the coalition from opposite ends: Giuliani alienating the social conservatives, and Huckabee the economic (and foreign-policy) conservatives. A Republican party that abandoned either limited government or moral standards would be much diminished in the service it could give the country.
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YmMxYTUyYzA1YTk2YzE5NGVmNjc0OGFjYWJmNzMzNjI=&p=1#more
I appreciate the rhetorical nature of your question, and the excellent faux bewilderment you express in asking the query. Well done!
Of course you know perfectly well what the answer is: Virtually all the rightwingers on this board profess to support Ron Paul. No con here is claiming to support Huckabee/Rudy/Thompson/Romney. So of course, Ron Paul is going to get lit up by liberals on the board. Enjoy! It’s all part of the fun of message boards!
Which rightwingers support Paul?
T
TRGLDTE
Guest
Like when Cynthia McKinney lost her re-election bid?
I'm a conservative......I'd vote for Huckabee.
I'm a conservative......I'd vote for Huckabee.
Why not Fred Thompson leaning? You get a Social Conservative who is also an economic Conservative favoring smaller government.
Huckabee is just another big government lover like Bush. He is also soft on crime and pushed his health lifestyle choices on Arkansas.
Blackflag
Junior Member
With Thompson you get another PNAC idiot.
With Huckabee, you get an economic liberal, social conservative. Yuck
With Giuliani you get a fascist
With Romney you get a flip flopping Mormon
Seems the only decent (R) choice is Paul and that doesn't seem likely to happen.
So no matter what, we get a bad president in 2008.